KCI등재
「금강살리기 사업」의 갈등구조 분석 = The Analysis of the Structure of Conflict of 'the Revitalizing Project of Geum River'
저자
발행기관
학술지명
권호사항
발행연도
2010
작성언어
-주제어
KDC
360
등재정보
KCI등재
자료형태
학술저널
발행기관 URL
수록면
115-139(25쪽)
제공처
The government said that the current 'revitalizing project of the four rivers' of the government is promoted to tackle the chronic water shortage and damages from flood through the policies such as preparing for weather change, the symbiotic relationship of the nature and human beings, territorial recreation, regional balanced development and establishment of the foundation for green growth. However various conflicts are occurring in the process to promote the recent 'revitalizing project of the four rivers', and 'the revitalizing project of Geum River' is not an exception. Here upon this study first analyzed the actual condition of conflicts among the central government, the local government on a broader unit area and the basic local government, residents and NGOs by dividing into conflict types by acting subject and characteristic, and then analyzed the actual condition of conflict by dividing this into the righteousness of project, environmental destruction, collecting the public opinion, compensation issues and conflicts related to the overlapping and waste of the budget. In particular, in the examination by specialist, the examination of AHP(Analytic Hierarchy Process) was conducted with three indexes by field and twelve detailed factors in order to measure the relative importance and priority about various conflicts that occur in the process of promotion of 'the revitalizing project of Geum River', and the pairwise comparison in which two elements are mutually compared at a time for each question was utilized. This was examined through e-mails since July 15th, 2010 through July 25th with members
of city and county assemblies, NGOs, residents, specialists, the press and public servants in charge as the subject, and 40 copies among the total 85 copies were withdrawn(the rate of withdrawal of 47%) and all of them were used and the main results of the analysis are as follows. First, the relative importance and priority among the field of measurement indicators about conflict were in the order of the main cause of conflict between the government and residents, the main cause of conflict between governments and the main cause of conflict between the
government and NGOs. Second, about the relative importance and priority among the field of 'measurement item'
about conflict, 'the conflict that occurs due to the relative difference of gain and loss among local governments' was the most important in the conflict between governments, and 'the conflict that occurs due to the inactive consultation with residents' was the most important in the conflict between the government and residents, and 'the conflict that occurs due to the destruction of the ecosystem' was the most important in the conflict between the government
and NGOs. Third, the relative importance and priority by measurement element of conflict between governments were in the order of the relative difference of gain and loss between local governments, the conflict over cost between the government and local governments, the inharmony of exercise of authority between governments and the overlapping and waste of the budget to promote the construction. Fourth, the relative importance and priority by measurement element of conflict between governments and residents were in the order of the conflict of the inactive consultation with residents, the controversy over compensation, the distribution of development profits and conflict and conflict over tackling the inconvenience of residents. Fifth, the relative importance and priority by measurement element of conflict between governments and NGOs were in the order of the destruction of the ecosystem, the controversy
over the righteousness of the project, the loss of cultural assets and securing water resources. In this point of view, there are conflicts of 'the revitalizing project of Geum River' in relation to 'the value conflict' which is an original opposition to 'the revitalizing project of the four rivers' such
서지정보 내보내기(Export)
닫기소장기관 정보
닫기권호소장정보
닫기오류접수
닫기오류 접수 확인
닫기음성서비스 신청
닫기음성서비스 신청 확인
닫기이용약관
닫기학술연구정보서비스 이용약관 (2017년 1월 1일 ~ 현재 적용)
학술연구정보서비스(이하 RISS)는 정보주체의 자유와 권리 보호를 위해 「개인정보 보호법」 및 관계 법령이 정한 바를 준수하여, 적법하게 개인정보를 처리하고 안전하게 관리하고 있습니다. 이에 「개인정보 보호법」 제30조에 따라 정보주체에게 개인정보 처리에 관한 절차 및 기준을 안내하고, 이와 관련한 고충을 신속하고 원활하게 처리할 수 있도록 하기 위하여 다음과 같이 개인정보 처리방침을 수립·공개합니다.
주요 개인정보 처리 표시(라벨링)
목 차
3년
또는 회원탈퇴시까지5년
(「전자상거래 등에서의 소비자보호에 관한3년
(「전자상거래 등에서의 소비자보호에 관한2년
이상(개인정보보호위원회 : 개인정보의 안전성 확보조치 기준)개인정보파일의 명칭 | 운영근거 / 처리목적 | 개인정보파일에 기록되는 개인정보의 항목 | 보유기간 | |
---|---|---|---|---|
학술연구정보서비스 이용자 가입정보 파일 | 한국교육학술정보원법 | 필수 | ID, 비밀번호, 성명, 생년월일, 신분(직업구분), 이메일, 소속분야, 웹진메일 수신동의 여부 | 3년 또는 탈퇴시 |
선택 | 소속기관명, 소속도서관명, 학과/부서명, 학번/직원번호, 휴대전화, 주소 |
구분 | 담당자 | 연락처 |
---|---|---|
KERIS 개인정보 보호책임자 | 정보보호본부 김태우 | - 이메일 : lsy@keris.or.kr - 전화번호 : 053-714-0439 - 팩스번호 : 053-714-0195 |
KERIS 개인정보 보호담당자 | 개인정보보호부 이상엽 | |
RISS 개인정보 보호책임자 | 대학학술본부 장금연 | - 이메일 : giltizen@keris.or.kr - 전화번호 : 053-714-0149 - 팩스번호 : 053-714-0194 |
RISS 개인정보 보호담당자 | 학술진흥부 길원진 |
자동로그아웃 안내
닫기인증오류 안내
닫기귀하께서는 휴면계정 전환 후 1년동안 회원정보 수집 및 이용에 대한
재동의를 하지 않으신 관계로 개인정보가 삭제되었습니다.
(참조 : RISS 이용약관 및 개인정보처리방침)
신규회원으로 가입하여 이용 부탁 드리며, 추가 문의는 고객센터로 연락 바랍니다.
- 기존 아이디 재사용 불가
휴면계정 안내
RISS는 [표준개인정보 보호지침]에 따라 2년을 주기로 개인정보 수집·이용에 관하여 (재)동의를 받고 있으며, (재)동의를 하지 않을 경우, 휴면계정으로 전환됩니다.
(※ 휴면계정은 원문이용 및 복사/대출 서비스를 이용할 수 없습니다.)
휴면계정으로 전환된 후 1년간 회원정보 수집·이용에 대한 재동의를 하지 않을 경우, RISS에서 자동탈퇴 및 개인정보가 삭제처리 됩니다.
고객센터 1599-3122
ARS번호+1번(회원가입 및 정보수정)