도르트 신경의 하나님 이해 = Understand of God in the Canon of Dort

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

The canon of Dort synod describes the doctrine of predestination of the Reformed against the Remonstrants. This paper compares the doctrine of God of the canon and the Remonstrants by observing the description about God described in the canon. First, we begin with a statement about God expressed in the canon, and we can see that the two characters of God, namely righteousness and love constitute the framework of the canon. And the structure of God’s righteousness and love has a close relationship with man's salvation as work of God. In particular, the meaning of sin that the canon premises helps not only the understanding of man, but also more clearly show the character of works of God. By looking at the way God works in relation to salvation, it turns out that the canon understands the problem of salvation in relation to God's attributes. It is based on the incomprehensibility of God that the canon criticizes God’s understanding of the Remonstrants. It points out that the act over this incomprehensibility of God is curiosity of man. And the canon states that in the problem about God’s sovereignty and man’s responsibility, which is the most important question, it is the right way to follow not man’s reasoning but the Bible’s teachings and that both do not conflict. Rather, the right response to man is to fear God. Although the canon deals with the understanding of God in this way, the canon discusses this issue based on utter practical interest. It is answering the real problems of the church, such as the election of infant, the doctrine of reprobation and the Ethic. Through this discussion it reveals that the doctrine of God of the Remonstrant is human-centered based on human experience, but that the doctrine of God of the canon of Dort is God-centered based on the Bible.

참고문헌 (Reference)

• 1 죤 칼빈, "칼빈 기독교 강요 상" 생명의말씀사 1988
• 2 정요석, "전적 부패, 전적은혜" 영음사 2018
• 3 이남규, "예정인가 후정인가? 항론파 제1항에 대한 도르트 회의 총대들의 논의와 결정" 11 : 164-187, 2014
• 4 필립 멜란히톤, "멜란히톤과 부처" 두란노아카데미 51-218, 2011
• 5 우병훈, "도르트 회의와 아우구스티누스: 파레우스의 “조사”와 영국 특사들의 “의견서”를 중심으로" 한국개혁신학회 59 : 133-174, 2018
• 6 김재윤, "도르트 총회와 신조에서 신학적 목회적 측면의 균형" 한국개혁신학회 59 : 12-47, 2018
• 7 안인섭, "도르트 총회(1618-1619) 직전 시대의 네덜란드 교회와 국가 관계의 배경 연구" 한국개혁신학회 57 : 279-312, 2018
• 8 프롱크 코르넬리우스, "도르트 종교회의" 마르투스 2017
• 9 박성환, "도르트 신조에 관한 설교학적 이해" 한국개혁신학회 59 : 48-84, 2018
• 10 도르트신경 400주년의 역사적 의미와 한국교회, "도르트 신조 노트" 그 책의 사람들 2018
• 11 김병훈, "도르트 신경이 고백하는 성도의 견인 교리" 11 : 218-259, 2014
• 12 김병훈, "도르트 신경의 예정론에 관련한 이해" 4 : 205-280, 2007
• 13 김영재, "기독교 신앙고백: 사도신경에서 로잔협약까지" 영음사 2011
• 14 Dingel, Irene, "Reformation" V&R 2016
• 15 Sinnema, Donald, "Early Ses-seions of the Synod of Dordt" V&R 2018
• 16 Müller, Ernst Friedrich Karl, "Die bekenntnisschriften der Reformierten kirche" A Deichert 1903
• 17 Selderhuis, Herman J., "Acta et Documenta Synodi Nationalis Dordrechtanae(1618-1619) Vol. I" V&R 2015