특수학교에서의 초등교사와 중등교사의 직무만족도 비교 = Elementary school teachers and secondary school teachers in special schools, job satisfaction comparative study
저자
발행사항
경산 : 대구대학교, 2012
학위논문사항
학위논문(석사)-- 대구대학교 : 교육학과 특수교육 2013. 2
발행연도
2012
작성언어
한국어
주제어
KDC
370
발행국(도시)
경상북도
형태사항
ⅲ, 57 ; 26cm
일반주기명
지도교수:김용욱
소장기관
This study is to investigate job satisfaction of elementary school teacher and middle school teacher regarding school level. By comparing job satisfaction of them, I want to suggest solution for job satisfaction and theoretical basis focused on support and policy direction for special education. In order to accomplish these research purposes, I analyzed the following research project.
First, is there general gap of job satisfaction between elementary and middle school teacher for mental retardation?
Second, is there gap of job satisfaction between elementary and middle school teachers for mental retardation according to low level factors?
Third, is there difference between elementary and middle school teachers for mental retardation according to back ground factors?
To accomplish these objects I analyzed questionnaires returned by 87 elementary school and 96 middle school teachers from distribution to the public special school and private special school in Daegu and Gyeungsangbuk province.
The result from this study is as in the following.
First, overall job satisfaction of elementary special school teacher for mental retardation is higher than middle special school teacher and elementary special school teacher's job satisfaction is higher than middle special school teacher's job satisfaction at the all low level factors.
Second, in case of job satisfaction of elementary special school and middle special school teachers regarding low level factor, both elementary and middle school teachers had the highest satisfaction with teaching attitude, middle special school teacher had the lowest satisfaction with operation factor of curriculum. In addition, elementary special school teacher had above-average satisfaction compare to middle school teacher in the all factors teaching attitude, human relationship, professional growth, compensation, curriculum operation, administrative support, relationship with local society.
Third, in case of job satisfaction of elementary special school and middle special school teachers regarding back ground factor, men had higher satisfaction than women in the elementary special school, there is no gap between men and women in the middle special school. In case of elementary school teacher regarding age, teachers in their twenties had high satisfaction, thirty and forty had relatively low satisfaction. But fifty had high satisfaction. middle special school teacher had no significant gap regarding age. In case of elementary special school. in case of elementary special school regarding authorized license, there is no significant gap between special education qualified teachers and general education+special education qualified teachers, except for relationship with local society. In case of middle special school teacher, special education qualified teachers had higher satisfaction than general education qualified teachers. In case of elementary school teacher regarding teaching career, under 5 years and over 15 years had much higher satisfaction than the others. in case of middle special school teacher, there is no significant gap except for relationship with local society.
According to this study, the main result is in the following.
First, elementary school teacher's job satisfaction is higher than middle school teacher's job satisfaction, and at the all low level factors it come to the same thing. Therefore, it is necessary to enhance middle school teacher's job satisfaction.
Second, both elementary and middle school teachers had the best satisfaction in the part of teaching attitude and elementary school teacher had the lowest satisfaction in the part of curriculum operating factors and middle school teacher had the lowest satisfaction in the part of compensation factors. Therefore, it is necessary to find new system which can enhance job satisfaction by analyzing low satisfaction factors. In addition, by contrast to middle school teacher elementary school teacher had above-average satisfaction in the part of teaching attitude, human relation, professional growth, compensation, curriculum operating, administrative support, community relation. Therefore, various supports system for middle school teacher is necessary.
Third, in case of elementary school, men showed higher satisfaction than women. By contrast, in case of middle school, there is no significant gap between men and women. In case of elementary school teacher, twenty and fifty teachers showed higher satisfaction than thirty and forty. There is no significant gap regarding age in case of middle school teachers. Therefore, support and help from school operator are necessary to reduce work responsibility and to enhance their job satisfaction. In case of elementary school teacher regarding licence, there is no significant gap between special education qualified teachers and general education+special education qualified teachers. In case of elementary school teacher regarding teaching career, under 5 years and over 15 years are much higher than others. Therefore, various supporting system for other group is necessary to enhance job satisfaction.
Proposals for follow-up study are in the following.
First, for analyzing job satisfaction between elementary school teacher and middle school teacher this study was accomplished by questionnaire method but this study can be more accurate when paired with questionnaire analysis for status recognition investigation of special school teacher and interview for various part.
Second, this study can not be the typical result for all special school teachers because it was accomplished by selected special school teacher within residents of Daegu and Gyeungsangbuk province. Therefore, the study targeting special school teacher in various location should be conducted.
Third, in this study, low level factors were limited as teaching attitude, human relationship, professional growth, compensation, curriculum operation, administrative support, relationship with local society so propriety controversy can be happened. Therefore, an accurate study should be conducted.
서지정보 내보내기(Export)
닫기소장기관 정보
닫기권호소장정보
닫기오류접수
닫기오류 접수 확인
닫기음성서비스 신청
닫기음성서비스 신청 확인
닫기이용약관
닫기학술연구정보서비스 이용약관 (2017년 1월 1일 ~ 현재 적용)
학술연구정보서비스(이하 RISS)는 정보주체의 자유와 권리 보호를 위해 「개인정보 보호법」 및 관계 법령이 정한 바를 준수하여, 적법하게 개인정보를 처리하고 안전하게 관리하고 있습니다. 이에 「개인정보 보호법」 제30조에 따라 정보주체에게 개인정보 처리에 관한 절차 및 기준을 안내하고, 이와 관련한 고충을 신속하고 원활하게 처리할 수 있도록 하기 위하여 다음과 같이 개인정보 처리방침을 수립·공개합니다.
주요 개인정보 처리 표시(라벨링)
목 차
3년
또는 회원탈퇴시까지5년
(「전자상거래 등에서의 소비자보호에 관한3년
(「전자상거래 등에서의 소비자보호에 관한2년
이상(개인정보보호위원회 : 개인정보의 안전성 확보조치 기준)개인정보파일의 명칭 | 운영근거 / 처리목적 | 개인정보파일에 기록되는 개인정보의 항목 | 보유기간 | |
---|---|---|---|---|
학술연구정보서비스 이용자 가입정보 파일 | 한국교육학술정보원법 | 필수 | ID, 비밀번호, 성명, 생년월일, 신분(직업구분), 이메일, 소속분야, 웹진메일 수신동의 여부 | 3년 또는 탈퇴시 |
선택 | 소속기관명, 소속도서관명, 학과/부서명, 학번/직원번호, 휴대전화, 주소 |
구분 | 담당자 | 연락처 |
---|---|---|
KERIS 개인정보 보호책임자 | 정보보호본부 김태우 | - 이메일 : lsy@keris.or.kr - 전화번호 : 053-714-0439 - 팩스번호 : 053-714-0195 |
KERIS 개인정보 보호담당자 | 개인정보보호부 이상엽 | |
RISS 개인정보 보호책임자 | 대학학술본부 장금연 | - 이메일 : giltizen@keris.or.kr - 전화번호 : 053-714-0149 - 팩스번호 : 053-714-0194 |
RISS 개인정보 보호담당자 | 학술진흥부 길원진 |
자동로그아웃 안내
닫기인증오류 안내
닫기귀하께서는 휴면계정 전환 후 1년동안 회원정보 수집 및 이용에 대한
재동의를 하지 않으신 관계로 개인정보가 삭제되었습니다.
(참조 : RISS 이용약관 및 개인정보처리방침)
신규회원으로 가입하여 이용 부탁 드리며, 추가 문의는 고객센터로 연락 바랍니다.
- 기존 아이디 재사용 불가
휴면계정 안내
RISS는 [표준개인정보 보호지침]에 따라 2년을 주기로 개인정보 수집·이용에 관하여 (재)동의를 받고 있으며, (재)동의를 하지 않을 경우, 휴면계정으로 전환됩니다.
(※ 휴면계정은 원문이용 및 복사/대출 서비스를 이용할 수 없습니다.)
휴면계정으로 전환된 후 1년간 회원정보 수집·이용에 대한 재동의를 하지 않을 경우, RISS에서 자동탈퇴 및 개인정보가 삭제처리 됩니다.
고객센터 1599-3122
ARS번호+1번(회원가입 및 정보수정)