基层次分析法的中国生鲜农产品 供应链风险评价体系硏究 = Research on the Supply Chain Risk Evaluation Index of chinese Fresh Agricultural Products Based on Analytic Hierarchy Process

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

In recent years, fresh agricultural products have increasingly become one of the indispensable foods on the table of consumers. However, due to the natural attributes of fresh agricultural products, fresh agricultural supply chain has higher risks than general supply chain. Therefore, it is particularly important to identify and evaluate the risks of fresh agricultural supply chain. This paper firstly combs the relevant domestic and foreign literatures on the risk of fresh agricultural product supply chain. On this basis, on the basis of building the fresh agricultural products supply chain risk evaluation system, involved 4 first-level indicators (demand risk, supply risk, logistics risk, information risk) and 12 secondary indicators, through the questionnaire survey to get the data by using AHP to determine the index weight, and the three different cases of fresh agricultural products supply chain risk assessment analysis, the results showed that: (1) in the risk system of fresh agricultural product supply chain, the weight of demand risk is the largest (0.5174), followed by supply risk (0.2490), logistics risk (0.1279), and information risk (0.1057). (2) among the 12 secondary risk indicator systems, the top six are price fluctuation (0.2753), product quality safety (0.1942), consumer preference (0.1894), delivery delay (0.0627), competition for the same product(0.0527) and information distortion (0.0518). (3) in the case study, the fresh agricultural products supply chain with BoLai agriculture as the core has the strongest risk resistance ability, followed by YiXiangnong and XianKelai. Finally, this paper puts forward some countermeasures and Suggestions from the aspects of supply and demand, logistics technology and mode, informatization and so on. In this paper, the risk assessment system of fresh agricultural supply chain is constructed by combining qualitative and quantitative methods and conducts empirical analysis, which provides theoretical basis for scientific risk avoidance countermeasures and effectively guarantees the continuous and stable operation of fresh agricultural supply chain.

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

近年来, 生鲜农产品越来越成为消费者餐桌上不可或缺的食物之一, 但由 于生鲜农产品本身的自然属性导致生鲜农产品供应链比一般供应链风险更 高, 因此, 对生鲜农产品供应链风险识别与评价显得尤为重要。本文首先对 生鲜农产品供应链风险的国内外相关文献进行了梳理, 在此基础上构建了生 鲜农产品供应链风险评价体系, 共涉及4个一级指标(需求风险、供应风险、 物流风险、信息风险)和12个二级指标, 其次通过问卷调硏获取数据运用层 次分析法确定指标权重, 幷对三条不同的生鲜农产品供应链进行风险评价的 案例分析, 硏究结果显示: (1)生鲜农产品供应链风险体系中, 需求风险的权 重最大(0.5174), 其次是供应风险(0.2490), 再次物流风险(0.1279), 最后是信 息风险(0.1057)；(2)12个二级风险指标体系中, 处于前六位的分别是价格波 动(0.2753)、产品质量安全(0.1942)、消费者偏好(0.1894)、交货延迟(0.062 7)、同产品竞争(0.0527)、信息失眞(0.0518)；(3)案例分析中博莱农业为核心 的生鲜农产品供应链抗风险能力最强, 其次是溢香农和仙客来。最后本文从 供需方面、物流技术与模式、信息化等四个方面提出了具有针对性的对策 建议和意见。本文通过定性与定量相结合的方法构建生鲜农产品供应链风 险评价体系幷进行实証分析, 为科学的制定风险规避对策提供了理论依据, 能有效的保障生鲜农产品供应链持续稳定的运作。

참고문헌 (Reference)

• 1 이충배, "글로벌 식품공급사슬의 위험관리전략" 한국로지스틱스학회 19 (19): 105-124, 2011
• 2 윤국, "공급사슬위험관리(SCRM)가 화주기업의 단기성과와 중⋅장기성과에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구" 한국물류학회 25 (25): 39-54, 2015
• 3 李刚, "论期货市场嵌入对我国订单农业的制度重构" 2012 (2012): 77-80, 2012
• 4 新浪财经, "补上生鲜食品安全短板"
• 5 冀巨海, "考虑取送作业的生鲜农产品配送路径优化模型与算法" 2018 (2018): 130-135, 2018
• 6 杨怀珍, "电子商务模式下生鲜农产品三级供应链协调" 2018 (2018): 126-130, 2018
• 7 刘沛, "生鲜农产品供应链风险规避与物流优化硏究" 2010 (2010): 74-75, 2010
• 8 甘燕燕, "生鲜农产品供应链风险分析及其对策" 19 (19): 37-40, 2017
• 9 贾强法, "生鲜农产品供应链结构优化分析" 2017 (2017): 107-109, 2017
• 10 徐娟, "生鲜农产品供应链突发事件风险的评估模型" 2012 (2012): 41-43, 2012
• 11 付焯, "生鲜农产品供应链物流风险传递机理及控制" 53 (53): 654-660, 2018
• 12 石岿然, "生鲜农产品供应链流通模式" 2017 (2017): 57-64, 2017
• 13 高更君, "物联网环境下 “互联网+”农业的供应链风险评估" 46 (46): 329-333, 2018
• 14 张敏杰, "改进模煳层次分析法在供应链绩效评价中的应用" 37 (37): 126-128, 2015
• 15 但斌, "基于社群经济的 “互联网+”生鲜农产品供应链C2B商业模式硏究" 2016 (2016): 16-23, 2016
• 16 李韫繁, "基于层次分析的农产品物流金融风险评估" 2017 (2017): 105-108, 2017
• 17 张英奎, "基于层次分析法的乳制品供应链质量安全评价体系硏究" 22 (22): 141-144, 2013
• 18 郑亚琴, "基于多维度的农产品供应链风险控制硏究" 2018 (2018): 52-55, 2018
• 19 杨德礼, "基于不同风险偏好组合的供应链协作方式的硏究" 18 (18): 7-10, 2006
• 20 李远远, "基于ANP－Fuzzy模型的农产品供应链风险评价硏究" 47 (47): 24-32, 2017
• 21 郑琳, "基于 “互联网+”的有机果蔬农产品供应链风险评价" 2017 (2017): 31-34, 2017
• 22 王钢, "基于 “云物流”模式的农产品供应链风险评价硏究" 2018 (2018): 178-179, 2018
• 23 刘乔, "农产品供应链风险评价硏究" 2011 (2011): 32-35, 2011
• 24 刘龙, "农产品供应链风险硏究" 2013 (2013): 69-70, 2013
• 25 王玉燕, "供应链、逆向供应链系统的定价策略模型" 2006 (2006): 40-44, 2006
• 26 于鹏, "优化生鲜农产品电子商务供应链对策硏究" 2015 (2015): 45-48, 2015
• 27 蒋丽君, "以农业生产企业为主导的生鲜农产品供应链优化硏究" 2018 (2018): 7-8, 2018
• 28 杨锐, "交易费用理论下基于模煳层次分析法的供应链分析" 31 (31): 103-106, 2015
• 29 "中华人民共和国国家标准 GB/T22502-2008"
• 30 Jacxsens, L., "Simulation Modelling and Risk Assessment as Tools to Identify the Impact of Climate Change on Microbiological Food Safety: The Case Study of Fresh Produce Supply Chain" 43 : 1925-1935, 2010
• 31 Vilko, J., "Risk Assessment in Multimodal Supply Chains" 140 (140): 586-595, 2012
• 32 Prakash, S., "Risk Analysis and Mitigation for Perishable Food Supply Chain: A Case of Dairy Industry" (24) : 2-23, 2017
• 33 Samvedi, A., "Quantifying Risks in a Supply Chain through Integration of Fuzzy AHP and Fuzzy TOPSIS" 51 (51): 2433-2442, 2013
• 34 Soto-Silva, W. E., "Operational Research Models Applied to the Fresh Fruit Supply Chain" 251 : 345-355, 2016
• 35 Oke, A., "Managing Disruptions in Supply Chains: A Case Study of a Retail Supply Chain" 118 (118): 168-174, 2009
• 36 Bortolini, M., "Fresh Food Sustainable Distribution: Cost, Delivery Time and Carbon Footprint Three-objective Optimization" 174 : 56-67, 2016
• 37 Wang, X. P., "Food Supply Chain Safety Risk Evaluation Based on AHP Fuzzy Integrated Evaluation Method" 10 (10): 233-244, 2016
• 38 Dong, Q., "An Orders-of-magnitude AHP Supply Chain Risk Assessment Framework" (8) : 144-156, 2016
• 39 Darby-Dowman, K., "A Two-stage Stochastic Programming with Recourse Model for Determining Robust Planting Plans in Horticulture" 51 (51): 83-89, 2000
• 40 Aqlan, F., "A Fuzzy-based Integrated Framework for Supply Chain Risk Assessment" 3 (3): 54-63, 2015
• 41 Prakash, S., "A Critical Analysis of Supply Chain Risk Management Content: A Structured Literature Review" 14 (14): 69-90, 2017