KCI등재
미술관 관람객 연구의 성과와 과제: 20세기 이후 미국의 연구를 중심으로 = Art museum visitor studies in the United States: A historical and conceptual analysis
저자
발행기관
학술지명
권호사항
발행연도
2003
작성언어
-주제어
KDC
320
등재정보
KCI등재
자료형태
학술저널
수록면
68-97(30쪽)
제공처
An exhibition could not and should not be evaluated only by the intrinsic value of art objects and the exhibition itself. Rather its values and meanings are completed by the responses and experiences of the visitors. Then, efforts to systematically understand how visitors interact with the museums and exhibitions should be of primary concern in art museums. In this study, the visitor studies published in the United States since the 20th century were analyzed with a focus on the art museums. Through the historical and conceptual analysis of the significant articles selected by the researcher, this study seeks to provide a comprehensive understanding of art museum visitors and meaningful implications for Korea art museums that recently began to study their visitors. The main areas of discussions are categorized as follows: 1) visitor behavior and exhibition science, 2) time and exhibition evaluation, 3) nature and effect of museum-based learning, 4) demographic characteristics of visitors, and 5) psychographic characteristics of visitors. First, the visitor studies which investigated the influence of the methods and design of an exhibition on the visitor behaviors were reviewed. In the earlystudies of the 1920’s and 30’s, such psychologists as Robinson and Melton experimented and observed how visitor behavior changed according to the physical environment of exhibitions, to enhance educational capacity of exhibitions. In their tracking study method, the concepts of “holding power” and “attracting power” of an exhibition (or an exhibit) were employed to access the interests and behavioral patterns of visitors. Also, psychological aspects of the “museum fatigue” were suggested. The concepts and methods devised by these early pioneers have been employed to date in numerous visitor studies. Secondly, visitor studies that utilized ‘time’ as an indicator to evaluate and define the effectiveness of exhibitions were examined. Being objective and easy to measure, time has been considered as an important variablethat could explain and predict the success of exhibitions, the amount of learning, as well as visitor satisfaction in museums. The general findings from many time studies, however, were that unlike the expectations from curators and exhibit designers, most visitors spent very short time at an exhibition (less than 30 minutes), and did not view every element of an exhibition. A recent report published in 1998 by the American Association of Museums which carried out a meta-analysis of tracking studies at 110 exhibitions of various types reaffirmed the facts. Therefore, the methods to maximize visitor attention and learning in the museum were suggested as the problems needed to be solved. The studies to prove educational results and to understand the nature of museum learning were discussed in the third area of museum visitor studies. Influenced by the recent learning theory called ‘constructivism’, many researchers have concentrated on the personal, long-term, and complex context of learning rather than short-term and outcome-oriented tests of the museum’s educational effect. For instance, Falk’s research on the long-term memory of museum visits and nature of museum experience were examined. Fourthly, demographic studies of art museum visitors provide another aspect in understanding the museum audiences. Profiles of art museum visitors known through a number of visitor surveys appear to be universal and homogeneous. That is, visitors to art museums tend to be in the upper education, income, and occupation groups than the population in general. However, it is not desirable to typify the art museum audience, as the demographic nature visitors could change and vary according to the types of art museums, exhibitions, seasons, and other elements. In this respect, the visitor survey that compared demographics and reactions of summer vs. winter audience at the Museum of Fine Arts in Boston was discussed. Meanw
더보기분석정보
서지정보 내보내기(Export)
닫기소장기관 정보
닫기권호소장정보
닫기오류접수
닫기오류 접수 확인
닫기음성서비스 신청
닫기음성서비스 신청 확인
닫기이용약관
닫기학술연구정보서비스 이용약관 (2017년 1월 1일 ~ 현재 적용)
학술연구정보서비스(이하 RISS)는 정보주체의 자유와 권리 보호를 위해 「개인정보 보호법」 및 관계 법령이 정한 바를 준수하여, 적법하게 개인정보를 처리하고 안전하게 관리하고 있습니다. 이에 「개인정보 보호법」 제30조에 따라 정보주체에게 개인정보 처리에 관한 절차 및 기준을 안내하고, 이와 관련한 고충을 신속하고 원활하게 처리할 수 있도록 하기 위하여 다음과 같이 개인정보 처리방침을 수립·공개합니다.
주요 개인정보 처리 표시(라벨링)
목 차
3년
또는 회원탈퇴시까지5년
(「전자상거래 등에서의 소비자보호에 관한3년
(「전자상거래 등에서의 소비자보호에 관한2년
이상(개인정보보호위원회 : 개인정보의 안전성 확보조치 기준)개인정보파일의 명칭 | 운영근거 / 처리목적 | 개인정보파일에 기록되는 개인정보의 항목 | 보유기간 | |
---|---|---|---|---|
학술연구정보서비스 이용자 가입정보 파일 | 한국교육학술정보원법 | 필수 | ID, 비밀번호, 성명, 생년월일, 신분(직업구분), 이메일, 소속분야, 웹진메일 수신동의 여부 | 3년 또는 탈퇴시 |
선택 | 소속기관명, 소속도서관명, 학과/부서명, 학번/직원번호, 휴대전화, 주소 |
구분 | 담당자 | 연락처 |
---|---|---|
KERIS 개인정보 보호책임자 | 정보보호본부 김태우 | - 이메일 : lsy@keris.or.kr - 전화번호 : 053-714-0439 - 팩스번호 : 053-714-0195 |
KERIS 개인정보 보호담당자 | 개인정보보호부 이상엽 | |
RISS 개인정보 보호책임자 | 대학학술본부 장금연 | - 이메일 : giltizen@keris.or.kr - 전화번호 : 053-714-0149 - 팩스번호 : 053-714-0194 |
RISS 개인정보 보호담당자 | 학술진흥부 길원진 |
자동로그아웃 안내
닫기인증오류 안내
닫기귀하께서는 휴면계정 전환 후 1년동안 회원정보 수집 및 이용에 대한
재동의를 하지 않으신 관계로 개인정보가 삭제되었습니다.
(참조 : RISS 이용약관 및 개인정보처리방침)
신규회원으로 가입하여 이용 부탁 드리며, 추가 문의는 고객센터로 연락 바랍니다.
- 기존 아이디 재사용 불가
휴면계정 안내
RISS는 [표준개인정보 보호지침]에 따라 2년을 주기로 개인정보 수집·이용에 관하여 (재)동의를 받고 있으며, (재)동의를 하지 않을 경우, 휴면계정으로 전환됩니다.
(※ 휴면계정은 원문이용 및 복사/대출 서비스를 이용할 수 없습니다.)
휴면계정으로 전환된 후 1년간 회원정보 수집·이용에 대한 재동의를 하지 않을 경우, RISS에서 자동탈퇴 및 개인정보가 삭제처리 됩니다.
고객센터 1599-3122
ARS번호+1번(회원가입 및 정보수정)