35% glycolic acid 필링관리가 노화피부의 탄력 및 피부상태에 미치는 효과와 자극평가 = (The)effect and stimulate appreciation to the skin and the realliance of the aging skin by the skin peeling method of 35% glycolic acid
저자
발행사항
서울: 성신여자대학교, 2010
학위논문사항
학위논문(석사) -- 성신여자대학교 문화산업대학원 , 문화산업학과(피부비만관리학전공) , 2010년 8월
발행연도
2010
작성언어
한국어
KDC
593.6 판사항(성신학위논문분류표)
발행국(도시)
서울
형태사항
viii, 41장: 채색삽도, 도표; 26 cm.
일반주기명
권말부록으로 '설문지', '실험군의 주름 영상변화' 수록
지도교수: 김명숙
권말에 참고문헌 및 영문초록 수록
소장기관
Abstract
The Effect and Stimulate Appreciation to the skin and the realliance of the aging skin by the Skin Peeling Method of 35% glycolic acid.
Jung Soon Lee
Major in Skin care and Obesity Management
Dept. of Cultural industry
Graduate School of Cultural industry
Sungshin Women's University
The study performs comparative analysis to examine the differences in aging skin, including skin oil, moisture, roughness, elasticity and wrinkles after treating with peeling care on the test group 2 that used 35% Glycolic acid only, and with the test group 1, that applied physical stimulus using suction and 35% Glycolic acid. The test aims devising a new indicator for the aging skin care by identifying the skin response conditions resulting from stimulus and the care of 35% Glycolic acid through the comparison between skin irritation and subjective valuation concerning use effects felt by test groups.
Twenty people ranging in 40s-70s age group living in Seoul and Gyeonggi province are chosen as experimental object of which have no peeling care experience six months prior to the test or no sensitive skin confirmation through facial diagnosed conducted by experts and, the test was rendered a total eight times, between January 12 to February 19, 2010 and skin care was given in two-week intervals. Triple sense (Moritex Co: K10229) and Beauty Scope (D012) were used to check skin oil and moisture. The wrinkled areas of eyes and lips were magnified using a Beauty Scope camera lens for comparative study, and the deepest wrinkled area was measured. Check diagnose was performed at the times of 0th,4thand8th,whilemeasurementwasperformedthreetimesrepeatedly.Seven questions are prepared for questionnaire details for subjective evaluation and skin irritation to examine stimulus after peeling care and subjective evaluation of wrinkle effect using the Likert Scale, and the results are as follows.
First, the amount of skin oil has increased around the forehead area by 40.7% and 0.06% which showed a higher increase in the group 1 than the group 2. In the experiment conducted for moisture, the group 1 showed a significant increase compared with the group 2, showing 124.0% and 57.6% increase, respectively.(p<0.05). After conducting a pigmentation experiment, the group 2 demonstrated a more significant increase than the group 1 by 20.0% and 40.6% (p<0.001), respectively. In this study, the test group 2 showed a higher increase, since it appears that the group 1 demonstrates faster skin tone stability, which received more stimuli in terms of skin rejuvenation ability.
Second, elasticity has gradually increased by 108.5%,87.1% (p<0.001), respectively by the group 1 and 2, and demonstrated significant increase after carrying out eight times of experiments. In the case of wrinkles around the eyes, the group 1 and 2 have decreased by 33.4% and 36.4%,(p<0.01)respectively. After carryout out the experiments, wrinkles around the lips showed dramatic decrease of 51.7% and 35.8% in the group 1 and group 2 (p<0.05), respectively. In the wrinkles care, much more change could be found after stimulus. For the case of wrinkles around the lips, the effect in the wrinkles of the test group 1 was shown much more in the skin change even against much more stimulus, which was caused by the fact that the wrinkles around the eyes could not be added a stimulus deeply due to their sensitive characteristics, while the wrinkles around the lips could be added the strongest stimulus on the face. Therefore, the greatest difference appeared around the areas of lips. However, the change in P value appeared great in terms of skin change for the case of test group 2 as well. This was because 35% Glycolic acid was indicated as a stimulus sensitively when contacting the skin in the case of stimulus due to peeling. In most cases 10-15% Glycolic acid is commonly used, and the skin feels as a great stimulus against 35% Glycolic acid. This study aims to obtain the accurate research method on the response of skin aging that appears due to stimulus and the change according to regeneration recovery through experiments. Even in the changes after four times of care and eight times of care, there were great differences against the first stimulus, whereas no change after it. From this result, it can be expected that the raising the level in stages and aging skin care in 50% and 70% will give a great effect. Even though that P value differed in the moisture only, and differed great differences in the oil components on the forehead, elasticity, pigment and wrinkles around the lips, no difference was shown between two test groups. This was because that the skin responses the effect in the change even against peeling. Therefore, the group 1 showed the change due to peeling stimulus, and as a next step, the stimulus by the suction machine was added for much more effect and satisfaction.
Third, in terms of stimulus peeling, the group 1 and 2 responded that they experienced stimulus by 100.0% and 90.0%, respectively. The subjective stimulus response to irritation symptom were 2.80 and 2.47 in the test group 1 and the test group 2, respectively, which was higher in the test group 1. However, when asked questions whether they wish to receive the treatment again, 100% of respondents in both test groups responded that they would receive again, which means that they were willing to endure some level of inconveniences for a greater result in terms of skin care effect.
Subjective valuation on skin change in the group 1 was 4.72 point, showing the highest point in the case of ‘the change associated with wrinkles’(M=4.90), in the order of ‘the degree of skin moisture’(M=4.80), ‘the degree of old keratin removal’(M=4.80), ‘the degree of skin brightness’(M=4.70), ‘the change of the skin resilience’(M=4.70), and ‘a change in pore’(M=4.40). As a whole, they appeared to be very high in the part of subjective evaluation (p<0.05, p<0.01, p<0.001).
The group 2 demonstrated the highest point at 3.88 point in ‘the degree of skin brightness’(M=4.30), in the order of ‘the degree of skin moisture(M=4.10), ‘the degree of old keratin removal’(M=3.80), ‘a change in wrinkles’(M=3.80), ‘the skin resilience’(M=3.80), and ‘a change in pores’(M=3.50).
Subjective valuation related to wrinkles showed the highest result around the lips and eyes (M=4.90) by 4.54 points on average by the group 1, followed by ‘the flabby wrinkles around the jaw’ (M=4.60), ‘a change in the facial form’(M=4.40), and ‘forehead wrinkles’(M=3.90). As a whole, they also appeared to be very high in the part of subjective evaluation (p<0.05, p<0.01, p<0.001).
Subjective valuation regarding overall wrinkles of the group 2 was 3.76 points on average, and in the order of ‘around the lips(M=’4.40), ‘around the eyes’ (M=4.00) at most, followed by ‘a change in the facial form’(M=3.90), ‘the flabby wrinkles around the jaw’(M=3.30), and ‘forehead wrinkles’(M=3.20), showing statically significant difference between the two groups regarding the change in wrinkles. The group 1 showed a great change in general wrinkle changes (p<0.05, p<0.01, p<0.001).
As a conclusion, the positive response in the subjective evaluation requires further deeper researches on the peeling against aging skin using 50% and 70% Glycolic acid. And the stepwise care using 35%, 50% and 70% Glycolic acid is hopefully suggested. In this experiment, the change after four times of care showed greater difference than that after eight times of care, which indicates that the response was sensitive to the first stimulus, but after a certain time elapses, the response got insensitive by accommodation. Accordingly, the stepwise researches are suggested again, and it is desired that this research can be a turning point as a new care method for aging shin. In addition, it was felt that the clinical data on peeling as well as papers and data on post peeling care are not enough yet. This study has been restricted by a short experimental time and in sufficient precise skin measurement devices, which did not result in the sufficient observation of the experiment results. In the future, I wish opportunities to observe with an electron microscope or an optical microscope would be given to skin care specialists, and the precise measurement devices could be used as experimental devices to observe the change in the regeneration on the thick skin.
서지정보 내보내기(Export)
닫기소장기관 정보
닫기권호소장정보
닫기오류접수
닫기오류 접수 확인
닫기음성서비스 신청
닫기음성서비스 신청 확인
닫기이용약관
닫기학술연구정보서비스 이용약관 (2017년 1월 1일 ~ 현재 적용)
| 주요 개정내역 | 변경 사유 |
|---|---|
| · 수탁업체 콘소시엄 기관명 및 위탁기간 명시 | · 제6조(개인정보 처리업무의 위탁) 구체화 |
한국교육학술정보원은 정보주체의 자유와 권리 보호를 위해 「개인정보 보호법」 및 관계 법령이 정한 바를 준수하여, 적법하게 개인정보를 처리하고 안전하게 관리하고 있습니다. 이에 「개인정보 보호법」 제30조에 따라 정보주체에게 개인정보 처리에 관한 절차 및 기준을 안내하고, 이와 관련한 고충을 신속하고 원활하게 처리할 수 있도록 하기 위하여 다음과 같이 개인정보 처리방침을 수립·공개합니다.
주요 개인정보 처리 표시(라벨링)
목 차
제1조(개인정보의 처리 목적)
제2조(개인정보의 처리 및 보유 기간)
제3조(처리하는 개인정보의 항목)
제4조(개인정보파일 등록 현황)
제5조(개인정보의 제3자 제공)
제6조(개인정보 처리업무의 위탁)
제7조(개인정보의 파기 절차 및 방법)
제8조(정보주체와 법정대리인의 권리·의무 및 그 행사 방법)
제9조(개인정보의 안전성 확보조치)
제10조(개인정보 자동 수집 장치의 설치·운영 및 거부)
제11조(개인정보 보호책임자)
제12조(개인정보의 열람청구를 접수·처리하는 부서)
제13조(정보주체의 권익침해에 대한 구제방법)
제14조(추가적 이용·제공 판단기준)
제15조(개인정보 처리방침의 변경)
제1조(개인정보의 처리 목적)
제2조(개인정보의 처리 및 보유 기간)
3년
또는 회원탈퇴시까지5년
(「전자상거래 등에서의 소비자보호에 관한3년
(「전자상거래 등에서의 소비자보호에 관한2년
이상(개인정보보호위원회 : 개인정보의 안전성 확보조치 기준)
제3조(처리하는 개인정보의 항목)
제4조(개인정보파일 등록 현황)
개인정보파일 검색(privacy.go.kr)| 개인정보파일의 명칭 | 운영근거 / 처리목적 | 개인정보파일에 기록되는 개인정보의 항목 |
보유기간 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 학술연구정보서비스 이용자 가입정보 | 한국교육학술정보원법 정보추제 동의 | 필수 | ID, 비밀번호, 성명, 생년월일, 신분(직업구분), 이메일, 소속분야, 웹진메일 수신동의 여부 | 3년 또는 탈퇴시 |
| 선택 | 소속기관명, 소속도서관명, 학과/부서명, 학번/직원번호, 휴대전화, 주소 | |||
제5조(개인정보의 제3자 제공)
제6조(개인정보 처리업무의 위탁)
제7조(개인정보의 파기 절차 및 방법)
제8조(정보주체와 법정대리인의 권리·의무 및 그 행사 방법)
제9조(개인정보의 안전성 확보조치)
제10조(개인정보 자동 수집 장치의 설치·운영 및 거부)
제11조(개인정보 보호책임자)
| 구분 | 담당자 | 연락처 |
|---|---|---|
| KERIS 개인정보 보호책임자 | 정보보호본부 안재호 |
- 이메일 : jinuk@keris.or.kr - 전화번호 : 053-714-0158 - 팩스번호 : 053-714-0195 |
| KERIS 개인정보 보호담당자 | 개인정보보호부 송진욱 | |
| RISS 개인정보 보호책임자 | 교육학술데이터본부 정광훈 |
- 이메일 : giltizen@keris.or.kr - 전화번호 : 053-714-0149 - 팩스번호 : 053-714-0194 |
| RISS 개인정보 보호담당자 | 학술진흥부 길원진 |
제12조(개인정보의 열람청구를 접수·처리하는 부서)
제13조(정보주체의 권익침해에 대한 구제방법)
제14조(추가적인 이용ㆍ제공 판단기준)
제15조(개인정보 처리방침의 변경)
자동로그아웃 안내
닫기인증오류 안내
닫기귀하께서는 휴면계정 전환 후 1년동안 회원정보 수집 및 이용에 대한
재동의를 하지 않으신 관계로 개인정보가 삭제되었습니다.
(참조 : RISS 이용약관 및 개인정보처리방침)
신규회원으로 가입하여 이용 부탁 드리며, 추가 문의는 고객센터로 연락 바랍니다.
- 기존 아이디 재사용 불가
휴면계정 안내
RISS는 [표준개인정보 보호지침]에 따라 2년을 주기로 개인정보 수집·이용에 관하여 (재)동의를 받고 있으며, (재)동의를 하지 않을 경우, 휴면계정으로 전환됩니다.
(※ 휴면계정은 원문이용 및 복사/대출 서비스를 이용할 수 없습니다.)
휴면계정으로 전환된 후 1년간 회원정보 수집·이용에 대한 재동의를 하지 않을 경우, RISS에서 자동탈퇴 및 개인정보가 삭제처리 됩니다.
고객센터 1599-3122
ARS번호+1번(회원가입 및 정보수정)