『新しい歴史敎科書』의 역사인식과 선사ㆍ고대사 서술 = The Historical Perception and the Pre and Ancient History Description of New History Textbook( Hushosha)

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

History textbook of Hushosha commits several critical errors. First of all, although the textbook insists that history is the learning of the past itself, the contents are not free from the tenacy of Imperialistic ideology. The word like Tennou(天皇), Nippon(일본), or race(民族) are frequently used since Kohun(古墳) period. For the worse, the subjects of ancient period is regarded as a nation(國民). In particular, Tennou is the main theme in the textbook. Myths based on Kojiki and Nihonshoki, tombs of ancient kings and symbol of golden hawk stress the importance, distinctiveness and perpetuity of Tennou. At the same time, the textbook gives emphasis to the superiority of Japan and Japanese. We can find the words like 'the biggest', 'the oldest', and 'only Japan.'
On the other hand, the basic facts are distorted here and there. The textbook describes the Jomon pottery was the oldest one in the world. But the same time or older pottery was found nowadays. It persists also the rice-farming began in Jomon period but the evidences are not enough. It records that Wa(倭) assisted Backjae and Silla to cope with Goguryo in 5th century, but the fact is different. Wa invaded Silla 19 times during the 5th century.
The 6th century's maps of other textbooks reveal the implicit confidence in the contents of Nihonshoki(日本書紀). These maps mark the Jeolla-namdo province as the new territory occupied by Backjae(百濟) in 512 and 513 A.D. according to the descriptions of Nihonshoki. But the area was attacked and surrendered by Dongsungwang(東城王) in the end of 5th century.
Inaccuracies and fallacies are also found in the 7th century maps. In the map of Hakusugie's combat(白村江戰鬪), Wa(倭) army is described as Japan(日本) army, in spite of no positive evidence for the usage of Japan in this period. Silla naval forces is marked as if it came to fight with Wa army across the South Sea(南海). But there is no evidence for the existence of Silla naval forces in the Hakusugie's combat.
To make matters worse, these errors and misunderstandings are not corrected and reproduced on an enlarged scale. The typical examples are the map of new territory of Backjae in 512 and 513, the map of disputed territory between Goguryo(高句麗), Backjae and Silla in 551 and 552, and the map of Hakusugie's combat in 663.

참고문헌 (Reference)

• 1 이하준, "환경은 세계사를 어떻게 바꾸었는가" 경당 54-62,
• 2 신형식, "일본역사교과서의 전근대관련 서술의 문제점 -·새로운 역사교과서·(扶桑社)를 중심으로-" 61 : 2001
• 3 網野善彦, "일본사회의 역사 상" 小花 7-8,
• 4 연민수, "일본 중학교 역사교과서의 古代史 서술과 歷史認識" 한국사연구회 (129) : 173-210, 2005
• 5 정재정, "일본 중학교 역사교과서에 나타난 韓國史觀의 특징 -扶桑社 간행 교과서를 중심으로" 16 : 2001
• 6 허동현, "일본 중학교 역사 교과서(후소샤 版) 문제의 배경과 특징―역사기억의 왜곡과 성찰―" 한국사연구회 129 (129): 147-171, 2005
• 7 김태식, "미완의 문명 7백년 가야사" 푸른역사 53-61, 2002
• 8 전상균, "근대 이전의 ‘征韓’-새역사교과서를 중심으로" 26 : 2003
• 9 菊地照夫, "記紀の神話ㆍ傳承の取り扱い-拠り所は戰前の國定敎科書- , In 歴史家が読む｢つくる会｣敎科書" 靑木書店 2001
• 10 勅使河原, "歴史敎科書は古代をどう描いてきたか" 新日本出版社 178-, 2005
• 11 勅使河原, "歴史敎科書は古代をどう描いてきたか" 新日本出版社 182-186, 2005
• 12 "日本書紀"
• 13 吉田孝, "日本の誕生" 岩波新書 118-123,
• 14 西尾幹二, "新しい歴史敎科書" 扶桑社 6-7, 2002
• 15 西尾幹二, "新しい歴史敎科書" 扶桑社 2001
• 16 藤岡信勝, "市販本 新しい歴史敎科書" 扶桑社 24-, 2005
• 17 田中俊明, "大加耶連盟の興亡と任那" 吉川弘文館 11-51, 1992
• 18 西尾幹二, "國民の歴史" 産經新聞社 1999
• 19 李成市, "古代史の問題點は何か, In 歴史敎科書何が問題か" 岩波書店 2001
• 20 "仁德陵古墳"
• 21 "三國史記"
• 22 "http://www.jiid.or.jp/files/04public/02ardec/ardec29/key_note3.htm"
• 23 서영일, "5~6세기의 高句麗 東南境 考察" 24 : 1991
• 24 이근우, "4~6세기의 국제정세와 가라국의 쇠퇴 원인" 19 : 2006