KCI등재후보
유럽소비자계약법에 있어서 철회권에 관한 고찰 = A Study on the right of withdrawal from European consumer contract law
저자
발행기관
학술지명
권호사항
발행연도
2008
작성언어
Korean
주제어
등재정보
KCI등재후보
자료형태
학술저널
수록면
247-281(35쪽)
KCI 피인용횟수
5
제공처
소장기관
The right of withdrawal is still a somewhat problematic legal instrument in
many EU States. One of the main problems is that the different European
directives that have introduced cooling off-periods, have cooling off-periods of
rather different lengths. In this respect, the directives regulating the right of
withdrawal lack coherence. The European Commission has recently raised the
question whether the duration and modalities of the withdrawal periods should be
harmonized and standardized. In this article, I will examine whether such is
possible. The main focus of the article is, however, on a more preliminary
question, under what circumstances the right of withdrawal is an effective and
useful means of consumer protection. In this article, I will try to answer that
question for the rights of withdrawal in the European directives mentioned above.
This article is based on an analysis of the respective directives introducing a
right of withdrawal and a cooling off-period and on their implementation in the
German and Dutch legal systems, and on comparative research on Dutch and
German law on the matter.
From the article it will be clear that even though the rights of withdrawal, as
a rule, function relatively well, a more uniform regulation of the right of withdrawal
- including a unitary terminology - in European legislation seems feasible. It has
been argued that a uniform cooling off-period of two weeks from the moment
when the contract is concluded is to be preferred over the existing situation. In
order for the right of withdrawal to be effective, the consumer must be made aware of his right of withdrawal by the seller or service provider. Of course, such
information must be provided in a clear manner and in clear and intelligible
language, in at least the language in which the contract was concluded. Extension
of the cooling off-period if the seller or service provider does not properly inform
the consumer thereof is an effective incentive to ensure that the seller or service
provider will perform his obligation to inform. However, it was argued, as law at
some point in time needs to resign itself to reality, a maximum period for the cooling
off-period is needed for reasons of legal certainty. The notice of withdrawal should
not be subject to any form requirement. However, if the consumer chooses to send
a notice in writing or on another durable medium for evidentiary reasons, the
dispatch principle should apply as regards the timeliness of the withdrawal.
Nevertheless, these observations alone do not suffice to propose a coherent,
uniform regime for cooling off-periods. If the European legislator really aspires to
develop such a regime, it will of course have to take into account the need to
provide clear answers as to the consequences of timely withdrawal, especially as
regards the return of goods delivered and money paid, as well as the consequences
regarding contracts that are connected with the contract from which the consumer
has successfully withdrawn.
The right of withdrawal is still a somewhat problematic legal instrument in
many EU States. One of the main problems is that the different European
directives that have introduced cooling off-periods, have cooling off-periods of
rather different lengths. In this respect, the directives regulating the right of
withdrawal lack coherence. The European Commission has recently raised the
question whether the duration and modalities of the withdrawal periods should be
harmonized and standardized. In this article, I will examine whether such is
possible. The main focus of the article is, however, on a more preliminary
question, under what circumstances the right of withdrawal is an effective and
useful means of consumer protection. In this article, I will try to answer that
question for the rights of withdrawal in the European directives mentioned above.
This article is based on an analysis of the respective directives introducing a
right of withdrawal and a cooling off-period and on their implementation in the
German and Dutch legal systems, and on comparative research on Dutch and
German law on the matter.
From the article it will be clear that even though the rights of withdrawal, as
a rule, function relatively well, a more uniform regulation of the right of withdrawal
- including a unitary terminology - in European legislation seems feasible. It has
been argued that a uniform cooling off-period of two weeks from the moment
when the contract is concluded is to be preferred over the existing situation. In
order for the right of withdrawal to be effective, the consumer must be made aware of his right of withdrawal by the seller or service provider. Of course, such
information must be provided in a clear manner and in clear and intelligible
language, in at least the language in which the contract was concluded. Extension
of the cooling off-period if the seller or service provider does not properly inform
the consumer thereof is an effective incentive to ensure that the seller or service
provider will perform his obligation to inform. However, it was argued, as law at
some point in time needs to resign itself to reality, a maximum period for the cooling
off-period is needed for reasons of legal certainty. The notice of withdrawal should
not be subject to any form requirement. However, if the consumer chooses to send
a notice in writing or on another durable medium for evidentiary reasons, the
dispatch principle should apply as regards the timeliness of the withdrawal.
Nevertheless, these observations alone do not suffice to propose a coherent,
uniform regime for cooling off-periods. If the European legislator really aspires to
develop such a regime, it will of course have to take into account the need to
provide clear answers as to the consequences of timely withdrawal, especially as
regards the return of goods delivered and money paid, as well as the consequences
regarding contracts that are connected with the contract from which the consumer
has successfully withdrawn.
분석정보
연월일 | 이력구분 | 이력상세 | 등재구분 |
---|---|---|---|
2026 | 평가예정 | 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증) | |
2020-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) | KCI등재 |
2017-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) | KCI등재 |
2013-01-01 | 평가 | 등재 1차 FAIL (등재유지) | KCI등재 |
2010-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) | KCI등재 |
2009-06-18 | 학회명변경 | 한글명 : 전남대학교 법학연구소 -> 법학연구소 | KCI후보 |
2009-06-11 | 학회명변경 | 한글명 : 법률행정연구소 -> 전남대학교 법학연구소영문명 : Research Institute of Law & Public Administration -> Legal Research Institute of Chonnam National University | KCI후보 |
2009-04-02 | 학회명변경 | 한글명 : 전남대학교 법학연구소 -> 법학연구소 | KCI후보 |
2009-03-27 | 학회명변경 | 한글명 : 법률행정연구소 -> 전남대학교 법학연구소영문명 : Research Institute of Law & Public Administration -> Legal Research Institute of Chonnam National University | KCI후보 |
2009-01-01 | 평가 | 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) | KCI후보 |
2007-01-01 | 평가 | 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) | KCI후보 |
기준연도 | WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) | KCIF(2년) | KCIF(3년) |
---|---|---|---|
2016 | 0.59 | 0.59 | 0.66 |
KCIF(4년) | KCIF(5년) | 중심성지수(3년) | 즉시성지수 |
0.77 | 0.75 | 0.805 | 0.3 |
서지정보 내보내기(Export)
닫기소장기관 정보
닫기권호소장정보
닫기오류접수
닫기오류 접수 확인
닫기음성서비스 신청
닫기음성서비스 신청 확인
닫기이용약관
닫기학술연구정보서비스 이용약관 (2017년 1월 1일 ~ 현재 적용)
학술연구정보서비스(이하 RISS)는 정보주체의 자유와 권리 보호를 위해 「개인정보 보호법」 및 관계 법령이 정한 바를 준수하여, 적법하게 개인정보를 처리하고 안전하게 관리하고 있습니다. 이에 「개인정보 보호법」 제30조에 따라 정보주체에게 개인정보 처리에 관한 절차 및 기준을 안내하고, 이와 관련한 고충을 신속하고 원활하게 처리할 수 있도록 하기 위하여 다음과 같이 개인정보 처리방침을 수립·공개합니다.
주요 개인정보 처리 표시(라벨링)
목 차
3년
또는 회원탈퇴시까지5년
(「전자상거래 등에서의 소비자보호에 관한3년
(「전자상거래 등에서의 소비자보호에 관한2년
이상(개인정보보호위원회 : 개인정보의 안전성 확보조치 기준)개인정보파일의 명칭 | 운영근거 / 처리목적 | 개인정보파일에 기록되는 개인정보의 항목 | 보유기간 | |
---|---|---|---|---|
학술연구정보서비스 이용자 가입정보 파일 | 한국교육학술정보원법 | 필수 | ID, 비밀번호, 성명, 생년월일, 신분(직업구분), 이메일, 소속분야, 웹진메일 수신동의 여부 | 3년 또는 탈퇴시 |
선택 | 소속기관명, 소속도서관명, 학과/부서명, 학번/직원번호, 휴대전화, 주소 |
구분 | 담당자 | 연락처 |
---|---|---|
KERIS 개인정보 보호책임자 | 정보보호본부 김태우 | - 이메일 : lsy@keris.or.kr - 전화번호 : 053-714-0439 - 팩스번호 : 053-714-0195 |
KERIS 개인정보 보호담당자 | 개인정보보호부 이상엽 | |
RISS 개인정보 보호책임자 | 대학학술본부 장금연 | - 이메일 : giltizen@keris.or.kr - 전화번호 : 053-714-0149 - 팩스번호 : 053-714-0194 |
RISS 개인정보 보호담당자 | 학술진흥부 길원진 |
자동로그아웃 안내
닫기인증오류 안내
닫기귀하께서는 휴면계정 전환 후 1년동안 회원정보 수집 및 이용에 대한
재동의를 하지 않으신 관계로 개인정보가 삭제되었습니다.
(참조 : RISS 이용약관 및 개인정보처리방침)
신규회원으로 가입하여 이용 부탁 드리며, 추가 문의는 고객센터로 연락 바랍니다.
- 기존 아이디 재사용 불가
휴면계정 안내
RISS는 [표준개인정보 보호지침]에 따라 2년을 주기로 개인정보 수집·이용에 관하여 (재)동의를 받고 있으며, (재)동의를 하지 않을 경우, 휴면계정으로 전환됩니다.
(※ 휴면계정은 원문이용 및 복사/대출 서비스를 이용할 수 없습니다.)
휴면계정으로 전환된 후 1년간 회원정보 수집·이용에 대한 재동의를 하지 않을 경우, RISS에서 자동탈퇴 및 개인정보가 삭제처리 됩니다.
고객센터 1599-3122
ARS번호+1번(회원가입 및 정보수정)