『삼천리』를 통해 본 친일의 논리와 정서 = The logic and mentality behind the Pro-Japanese positron, reflected in the 〈Samcheon-ri〉 magazine

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

In this article, the logic and mentality that existed behind the pro-Japanese position which prevailed during the 1930s and '40s are examined, through the literary works published in the popular magazine 『Samcheon-ri(三千里)』, of which publication was overseen by a pro-Japanese intellectual named Kim Dong Hwan. The pro-Japanese arguments that we can find inside 『Samcheon-ri』 display a tone which was significantly enforced and aggressively expressed with tile breakout of tile war. Added to that, a specific kind of perception of tile world, a position supporting modernization, and also a view upon the issue of people(nation), all being products of tile modem days of Korea, can be found behind such pro-Japanese arguments. The perception of tile world exhibited in 『Samcheon-ri』was based upon Social Darwinism, while the cause of modemization was based upon the idea of Korea's subordinacy to Japan and also a certain level of 'Asian-ism' supporting tile idea of 'cooperations' between East Asian countries, and the view upon tile nation supported the idea of the Korean people and the Korean nation being 'assimilated' into Japan.
From a Social Darwin-ist viewpoint to perceive the world, and from an attitude that supported the concept of 'subordinate modernization", Japan's war was considered as a noble war waged out of a grand vision determined to develop itself to become a stronger state and also a modernly civilized nation. And at the same time, the idea of 'developing' Joseon as a supposedly 'economic partner' of Japan, was justified and supported as well. Also, the meaningful existence of Joseon was only granted and acknowledged 'conceptually' inside the 'East Asian Cooperative block' with Japan at its center. Japan had been reshaping Asia since the 19th century, and under such sentiment (of the Japanese people), Koreans were forced to cooperate with the system.
In the meantime, the argument of 'the Japanese inland and the Joseon peninsula as one', which surfaced after the Sino-Japanese war ended, was an argument inherently Fascist in nature, as it supported the idea of forming a 'Mega-state unbounded by and also transcending Nationalism', which also imagined Joseon shattering its national boundaries and joining the 'Japanese state' inside the 'East Asian Cooperative block' as a legitimate part of it. This argument of 'Japan and Joseon as one' displayed racism and state-ism merged with each other, and it was also related to the 'Assimilation argument', which was the primary position of the Japanese colonial rulers as well.
With the war heating up, the editors of 『Samcheon-ri』magazine, in their efforts to achieve the objective making 'Japan and Joseon as one', encouraged the Korean people to brush up their patriotism and spreaded totalitarian national sentiments throughout the Korean population, through emphasizing the merits of a reactionary spirit honoring militalism(尙武) and propagating the 'rural qualities'. In the wake of ever elevating wartime mobilization in the 1940s, such efforts manifested themselves in the form of campaigns("New System Movement") launched by the Joseon Governor General office, which promoted local artistic activities, agricultural entertainment and the honoring of local traditions, In such campaigns, things that were Joseon and things that were local in nature were promoted to a certain extent, yet such concept of 'localism' denoted no other man regional qualities 'conceptualized' inside the supposed 'Great state of Japan', and as a result, such concept carne to generate abundantly colonial nuances. In the end, what was promoted as 'national(Korean)', was in fact most anti-national in nature, and anti-Korean in nature as well.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• 머리말
• 1. ‘삼천리’에서 ‘대동아’로
• 2. 전쟁과 체제협력론
• 3. 내선일체론과 파시즘 민족 정서
• 맺음말
• 〈Abstract〉

참고문헌 (Reference)

• 1 "힌국근대문화사상사연구" 혜안 2007
• 2 조재곤, "한말 조선지식인의 동아시아 삼국제휴 인식과 논리" 37 : 2000
• 3 "한국근현대사교육에서 민족주의와 근대주체" 95 : 2005
• 4 오미일, "한국근대자본가연구" 한울아카데미 2002
• 5 이지원, "한국근대문화사상사연구" 혜안 2007
• 6 2005, "파시즘기 민족주의자의 민족문화론 In: 일제하지식인의 파시즘체제 인식과 대응" 혜안
• 7 마크 네오클라우스, "파시즘"
• 8 崔鉉培, "줄다리기와 씨름" 13 (13):
• 9 "재외조선인 현지 특보" 13 (13): 1942
• 10 배성준, "일제 말기 통제경제법과 기업통제" 27 : 2001
• 11 金英植, "언론인 파인 김동환연구" 신성출판사 2000
• 12 金英植, "아버지 巴人 金東煥" 국학자료원 1994
• 13 "신지나로 조선민중진출책, 상해에서 군관민 좌담회" 11 (11): 1939
• 14 박성진, "사회진화론과 식민지 사회사상" 선인 2003
• 15 전복희, "사회진화론과 국가사상" 한울출판사 1998
• 16 "북만진출의 조선재벌" 12 (12): 1940
• 17 "만주가서 돈 벌려면" 8 (8): 1936
• 18 김도형, "대한제국기 계몽주의계열 지식층의 ‘삼국제휴론’" 13 : 2000
• 19 朴啓周, "납치된 ‘국경의 밤’의 시인 『자유문학』"
• 20 원 철, "나치즘 In: 서양의 지적운동Ⅱ" 지식산업사 1998
• 21 오성호, "김동환-한 근대주의자의 행로" 건국대학교출판부 2001
• 22 김윤태, "김동환 -각종 친일단체의 핵심으로 맹활약한 친일시인 In: 친일파99인(3)" 돌베개 1993
• 23 이광린, "開化期 韓國人의 아시아연대론 In: 開化派와 開化思想硏究" 일조각 1989
• 24 高裕燮, "鄕土藝術의 意義와 그 助興" 13 (13): 1941
• 25 "鄕土藝術과 農村娛樂 振興策 - 李能和, 朝鮮 鄕土藝術論"
• 26 宋錫夏, "農村娛樂"
• 27 "西伯利亞의 朝鮮人 去就, 朝鮮人의 極東 移民" 12 (12): 1940
• 28 "蘭印, 佛印에 朝鮮鑛業家들" 12 (12): 1940
• 29 崔麟, "英雄 名將과 時勢" 10 (10): 1938
• 30 李光麟, "舊韓末 社會進化論의 受用과 그 影響 In: 韓國開化思想硏究" 일조각 1979
• 31 金斗禎, "興亞的 大使命으로 본 內鮮一體" 12 (12): 1940
• 32 韓相龍, "聖를 잡고"
• 33 韓相龍, "聖를 잡고" 13 (13): 1941
• 34 金洙, "聖?部隊와 古都參勤記"
• 35 金洙, "聖?部隊와 古都參勤記"
• 36 "總督府高等官 諸氏가 戰時下 朝鮮民衆에 傳하는 書, 大東亞共榮圈建設과 朝鮮民衆" 13 (13): 1941
• 37 申一澈, "申采浩의 歷史思想硏究" 고려대학교출판부 1990
• 38 "特輯 東亞協同體와 朝鮮" 11 (11): 1939
• 39 "滿洲國에서 활동하는 人物" 9 (9): 1937
• 40 "滿洲國에 朝鮮人의 高官 百餘名" 12 (12): 1940
• 41 "海內 海外 朝鮮同胞의 現地報告, 朝鮮人發展策 新年之辭" 14 (14): 1941
• 42 "民族正氣의 審判" 혁신출판사 1949
• 43 印貞植, "民族問題의 方法論" 11 (11): 1939
• 44 "民族主義와 思想犯" 11 (11): 1939
• 45 "民族主義와 思想犯" 11 (11): 1939
• 46 "東洋의 侵略者 英·米打倒의 大獅子吼" 14 (14): 1942
• 47 天道敎, "東洋平和의 根本策" 9 (9): 1937
• 48 崔南善, "東方古民族의 神聖觀念" 13 (13): 1941
• 49 "東亞新秩序の神話 In: 近代日本政治思想史 2" 有斐閣
• 50 劉昌宣, "朝鮮鄕土藝術振興論" 13 (13): 1941
• 51 "時局有志圓卓會議" 11 (11): 1939
• 52 權相老, "時局 覺醒의 必要性"
• 53 米谷匡史, "日中戰爭期の天皇制 - ‘東亞新秩序’論·新體制運動と天皇制 - In: 總力戰下の知と制度" 岩波書店 2002
• 54 金文輯, "新文化主義的 文藝時評" 10 (10): 1938
• 55 "新支那의 政治家論客의 日支和平要綱" 12 (12): 1940
• 56 "新年辭 - 亞細亞의 榮繁과 新東亞建設을 爲하야 -" 11 (11): 1939
• 57 菊池寬, "文學도 大轉換, 國家的 意義 있는 題材를" 12 (12): 1940
• 58 金文輯, "文壇再建論" 11 (11): 1939
• 59 金文輯, "文壇再建論" 11 (11): 1939
• 60 元悳常, "敬神崇祖의 一念"
• 61 長江學人, "支那市場確保와 大資源國家로 日本登場" 3 (3): 1939
• 62 朴興植, "扶蘇山城趾와 內鮮史實"
• 63 "戰爭과 株式市場 - 12條發動을 中心삼고서" 3 (3): 1939
• 64 "戰爭文學’과 ‘朝鮮作家’ - 戰爭과 文學과 그 作品을 말하는 座談會" 11 (11): 1939
• 65 張德秀, "戰時와 産業報國" 11 (11): 1939
• 66 方台榮, "愛國의 導火線"
• 67 "愛國獻金 百三十萬圓, 崔昌學氏의 四萬圓을 筆頭로" 9 (9): 1937
• 68 金明植, "建設意識과 大陸進出" 11 (11): 1939
• 69 金明植, "建設意識과 大陸進出" 11 (11): 1939
• 70 韓亮鎬, "尙武의 精神을 鼓舞하자" 12 (12): 1940
• 71 金重根, "尙武精神과 愛國心" 12 (12): 1940
• 72 "室―우리 社會의 諸內幕" 10 (10): 1938
• 73 "大東亞戰爭과 半島의 武裝 - 決戰大演說速記錄 특집" 14 (14): 1942
• 74 "國策會社에 登장한 財界巨星 - 朝鮮工作과 濟州道 興業의 河駿錫, 東洋燃料會社에 등장한 金桂祚, 服工業界에 등장한 成樂憲, 航空事業界에 등장한 愼鏞頊氏" 11 (11): 1939
• 75 "吾人의 耳目을 滿蒙에 모우자" 3 (3): 1931
• 76 權泰檍, "同化政策論" 172 : 2001
• 77 "南新總督諭告" 8 (8): 1936
• 78 "半島의 物産과 文化" 12 (12): 1940
• 79 "前同友會員의 聲明書" 10 (10): 1938
• 80 "前同友會員의 聲明書" 10 (10): 1938
• 81 金漢卿, "共同運命에의 결합과 그 還元論" 12 (12): 1940
• 82 朴基孝, "兩祖先의 文化交流"
• 83 方義錫, "內鮮史實의 回想"
• 84 玄永燮, "內鮮一體’와 朝鮮人의 個性問題" 12 (12): 1940
• 85 三木治夫, "內鮮一體·東亞協同體の問題 『東洋之光』"
• 86 孫晉泰, "傳統娛樂振興問題"
• 87 金允經, "健全한 趣味와 娛樂"
• 88 韓相龍, "事變後의 現地 朝鮮民衆, 北支일대에 朝鮮人 增加率 激甚" 12 (12): 1940
• 89 南次郞, "事變の將來と內鮮一體 『東洋之光』"
• 90 "三千里』 9권 5호"
• 91 高元勳, "一草一木에 靈氣"
• 92 閔奎植, "一土壤, 一土塊에 心魂"
• 93 조용만, "『중앙일보』‘30년대의 문화계’"
• 94 "『大東亞』 15권 1호" 1943
• 95 "『大東亞』 14권 3호" 1942
• 96 "『大東亞』 14권 3호" 1942
• 97 "『三千里』 9권 5호" 1937
• 98 "『三千里』 13권 7호"
• 99 "『三千里』 12권 7호"
• 100 "『三千里』 12권 6호"
• 101 "『三千里』 12권 6호"
• 102 "『三千里』 12권 5호"
• 103 "『三千里』 11권 1호"
• 104 "『三千里』 10권 8호"
• 105 "『三千里』 10권 12호" 1938
• 106 "『三千里』 10권 10호"
• 107 Carter J. Eckert, "Offspring of Empire : The Kochang Kims and the Colonial Origins of Korean Capitalism, 1876-1945" ity of Washington Press 1991
• 108 방기중, "1940년 전후 조선총독부의 ‘신체제’인식과 병참기지 강화 정책-총독부 경제지배시스템의 특질과 관련하여-" 국학연구원 (138) : 97-152, 2007
• 109 방기중, "1930년대 조선 농공병진정책과 경제통제 In: 일제 파시즘 지배정책과 민중생활" 혜안 2004
• 110 方基中, "1930년대 物産?勵運動과 民族·資本主義經濟思想" 115 : 2002
• 111 池秀傑, "1930년대 前半期 부르주아 民族主義者의 ‘民族經濟 建設戰略’" 51 : 1994
• 112 이지원, "1920~30년대 일제의 조선문화지배정책" 75 : 2000
• 113 李秀日, "1920~30년대 韓國의 經濟學風과 經濟硏究의 動向" 4 (4): 1997
• 114 정상우, "1910년대 일제의 지배논리와 조선지식인층의 인식" 서울대학교 국사학과 2001
• 115 "1910년대 新知識層의 國粹觀과 국수보존운동" 84 : 2002