64-절편 다행검출 CT 검사에서의 환자선량과 암 발생의 Lifetime Attributable Risk(LAR) 평가

국문 초록 (Abstract)

본 연구는 임상에서 시행되고 있는 64 절편 다행검출 CT(MDCT)의 방사선량에 대해 알아보고 이 선량으로 인한 암 발생의 잠재적 위험(LAR)을 정량화하고자 하였다. CT 검사의 선량길이곱과 유효선량을 측정하였고, 이로 인한 암 발생 귀속위험은 미국 전리방사선의 생물학적효과 위원회 7차보고서를 이용하였다. 결과에서 두부 CT의 유효선량은 l.48mSv, 흉부 CT(조영제 포함)의 유효선량은 7.66mSv였으며, 복부 역동적 CT는 24.52mSv였다. 두부 CT의 LAR은 남성 7463명 중 1명, 여성 4926명 중 1명이었고, 흉부 CT (조영제포함)의 LAR은 남성 1449명 중 1명, 여성 952명 중 1명이었으며, 복부 역동적 CT는 남성 453명 중 1명, 여성 298명 중 1명이었다. 따라서 64 절편 MDCT 검사는 암발생위험과 무시할 수 없는 관련성이 있었고, 선량을 줄이기 위해 프로토콜 등을 조정하는 등의 세심한 노력을 기울여야 한다.

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

This study was to estimate the radiation dose associated with 64-slice multidetector CT(MDCT) in clinical practice and quantify the potential cancer risk associated with these examinations. Lifetime attributable risks(LAR) were estimated with models developed in the national Academies' Biological Effects of Ionizing Radiation Ⅶ report. Mean effective dose were 1.48mSv in Brain axial scan, 7.66mSv in chest routine contrast, 12.l7mSv in coronary angiogram, 24.52mSv in Dynamic abdomen scan. LAR estimates for brain routine varied from 1 in 7463 for man to 1 in 4926 for women. In chest routine with contrast, LAR varied from 1 in 1449 for men to 1 in 952. LAR of Abdomen dynamic CT varied from 1 in 453 for men to 1 in 298 for women. So, 64-slice MDCT scan is associated with non-negligible LAR of cancer. Doses can be reduced by careful attention to scanning protocol.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• 요약
• Abstract
• Ⅰ. 서론
• Ⅱ. 대상 및 방법
• Ⅲ. 결과
• Ⅳ. 고찰
• Ⅴ. 결론
• 참고문헌
• 저자소개

참고문헌 (Reference)

• 1 임청환, "전산화단층촬영 검사의 방사선 선량에 관한 연구" 대한방사선과학회 30 (30): 381-389, 2007
• 2 의료피폭가이드라인위원회, "의료피폭의 가이드라인"
• 3 건강보험심사평가원, "건강보험통계연보" 2006
• 4 J. M. Boone, "The trouble with" 34 (34): 1364-1371, 2007
• 5 유병규, "Textbook of computed tomography" 청구문화사 608-622, 2005
• 6 R. L. Dixon, "Restructuring CT dosimetry-A realistic strategy for the future. Requiem for the pencil chamber" 33 (33): 3973-3976, 2006
• 7 R. Smith-Bindman, "Radiation with common computed tomography examinations and the associated lifetime attributable risk of cancer" 169 (169): 2078-2086, 2009
• 8 S. Diederich, "Radiation exposure associated with imaging of the chest: comparison of different radiographic and computed tomography techniques" 89 (89): 2457-2460, 2000
• 9 J. Andrew, "Radiation dose and cancer risk estimates in 16-slice computed tomography coronary angiography" 15 (15): 232-240, 2008
• 10 L. F. Rogers, "Radiation Exposure in CT: Why so high?" 177 (177): 269-277, 2001
• 11 김광표, "Projected Cancer Risks From Computed Tomographic Scans Performed in the United States in 2007" AMER MEDICAL ASSOC 169 (169): 2071-2077, 200912
• 12 FDA, "Nationwide Evaluation of X-ray Trends(NEXT) Computed Tomography Dataset"
• 13 European Atomic Energy Community, "NEW Euratom Directive 43"
• 14 ICRP, "Managing Patient Dose in Multi-Detector Computed Tomography" ICRP publication 102-, 2007
• 15 D. J. Brenner, "It is time to retire the computed tomography dose index(CTDI) for CT quality assurance and dose optimization. For the proposition" 33 (33): 1189-1191, 2006
• 16 The Royal College of Radiologists, "Good Practice Guide for Clinical Radiologists" Royal College of Radiologists 1999
• 17 R. Fazel, "Exposure to low-dose ionizing radiation from medical imaging procedures" 361 (361): 849-857, 2009
• 18 G. Bongartz, "European guidelines on quality criteria for computed tomography, EUR 16262"
• 19 European Commission, "European guidelines on quality criteria for computed tomography" Office for Official Publications of the European Communities
• 20 A. J. Einstein, "Estimating risk of cancer associated with radiation exposure from 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography" 298 (298): 317-323, 2007
• 21 NRPB, "Doses from Computed Tomography (CT) Examinations in the U.K. 2003 Review" NRPB 2003
• 22 National research council of the National academies, "Division on Earth and Life Studies, Board on Radiation Effects Research" National Academy Press 2005
• 23 D. J. Brenner, "Computed tomography: an increasing source of radiation exposure" 357 (357): 2277-2284, 2007
• 24 보건복지가족부, "CT 엑스선검사에서의 환자선량 권고량 가이드라인"
• 25 E. S. Amis, "American college of radiology white paper on radiation dose in medicine" 4 (4): 272-284, 2007
• 26 김문찬, "64 채널 Multi-Detector Computed Tomography를 이용한 관상동맥검사의 선량 : 검사 프로토콜 다변화에 따른 환자선량 감소" 대한방사선과학회 32 (32): 299-306, 2009