고구려-수 전쟁의 배경 연구
저자
발행사항
서울 : 경희대학교 일반대학원, 2013
학위논문사항
학위논문(박사)-- 경희대학교 일반대학원 대학원 : 사학과 한국사 전공 2013. 8
발행연도
2013
작성언어
한국어
주제어
DDC
901 판사항(22)
발행국(도시)
서울
기타서명
A Study on Historical Background of the Koguryo-Sui War
형태사항
ⅲ, 180 p. : 삽화 ; 26 cm
일반주기명
지도교수: 조인성
경희대학교 논문은 저작권에 의해 보호받습니다.
참고문헌: p. 159-173
소장기관
This paper aims to analyze historical background of the Koguryo-Sui War and focuses on Koguryo’s policy on Liaoxi and political situation in the region.
In the period between 5th and mid-6th century, Koguryo exerted powerful influence in the east of Mount Yiwulu and Dalinghe river in the Liaoxi region. Sphere of influence in the Liaoxi, however, did not solely belong to Koguryo as other powerful entities such as Northern Dynasties, Ruanruan, or Turks also intersected in the region. The ethnos of Liaoxi was decided by changes in international relations. Koguryo’s sphere of influence in the Liaoxi therefore was by no means fixed, but subject to ongoing changes. Liaoxi was better conceptualized as a border zone between Koguryo and neighboring states.
Koguryo established and organized la, a type of military base, in Liaoxi. La was located in various places along the western part of Liao river, and its function was to patrol and inspect the Liao river as well as to act as a gateway for its Liaoxi policy. At the same time, the region’s various tribes were granted considerable autonomy.
The multi-polar system in East Asia underwent drastic changes from the late 570s. The change was triggered by the Northern Zhou’s occupation of Northern Ch’i and hence the northern China, signaling the beginning of changes in the balance of power. On the other hand, Koguryo was confronting Gaobaoning, which was in conflicts with Northern Zhou with the support of Turks. This effectively created the triangular confrontation between Koguryo, Northern Zhou, and Turk-Gaobaoning. Under this structural confrontation, Koguryo was competing against Gaobaoning over the influence in the Liaoxi region.
The international relations in East Asia experienced another major shift in 580s. The Northern Zhou was replaced by Sui dynasty and Spara Khagan became a king in Turk heightening its tension with Sui. In response, Gaobaoning attacked the Sui’s northern border with the Turks in the 580s. However, Sui staged a powerful counterattack against Turks, which crumbled Gaobaoning group. Sui then advanced into the Liaoxi. Sui’s initial policy was to appease Liaoxi region through its Regional Command Office. It, however, exerted little direct influence in the region until the mid-580s.
At the same time, with an internal division after its defeat by Sui, Turk effectively lost its influence in the Liaoxi region. In the palace of Turk, Khitan emerged while Koguryo also tried to expand its influence.
Sui’s Liaoxi policy began with the creation of Yingzhou Regional Commander Office in the late 580s. The Commander Office tried to expand its influence by winning political favors of the Liaoxi region. The tribes under Koguryo influence began to agitate, and Koguryo sought to simultaneously contain the agitation and launch attacks on the tribes that have turned to Sui. However, Sui’s absorption of Chen and the consequent emergence as the most powerful state in Northeast Asia forced Koguryo to resort to power-balancing strategy rather than direct confrontation.
In 598, the two states faced a possibility of all-out war. In 598 Koguryo attacked the Sui’s Liaoxi region, to which Sui mobilized a large army to counterattack. Then, Koguryo called Mohe’s army. This move aimed to reduce international and domestic political burden of directly confronting Sui, and this was supported by emerging group of elites in the Liaoxi who pursued active foreign policy to secure Koguryo’s pre-mid 6th century sphere of influence.
Sui’s immediate counterattack against Koguryo’s advance into the Liaoxi ultimately failed because of the logistical problem into the Liaoxi region. Despite the failure, Sui’s Guan-Long Clique was formulating a war-plan since the mid-590s on Koguryo in order to seize the trade in Liaoxi and Northeast Asia. This may explain the immediacy of Sui’s counterattack.
The Koguryo’s attack on Liaoxi in 598 targeted the Yingzhou Regional Commander Office. The Office had been successful in expanding its influence into Northwest area, which consequently raised an alarm to Koguryo. Koguryo’s attack to Liaoxi was a response to this expansion and an effort to maintain the balance of power in the region. The Sui’s counterattack failed and the relationship with Koguryo was restored. The Koguryo’s attack appears to have achieved its objectives.
On the surface, the relationship between Koguryo and Sui was largely friendly between 598 and 607. This restoration of the relationship was due to the Sui-Turk war in 598-603, which forced Sui to avoid confrontation with Kogury. Koguryo also was taking a “wait and see” approach. However, Sui established and maintained Zhen and Shu, beginning to advance eastward again after 603-604. The advance was possible at the expense of Koguryo’s loss of influence in the Liaoxi, heightening the sense of crisis in Koguryo. A tension between the two powers began to intensify again.
It has been argued that Sui’s offensive plan on Koguryo was devised after Koguryo’s secret envoy was exposed at Qiminkehan in 607. However, Sui’s offensive plan to neighboring states began in Emperor Yangti’s accession. Koguryo was no exception. Yangti collected basic information on Koguryo prior to 607 through Peiju and recorded them in “Koguryo Tradition”.
Koguryo maintained trade with neighboring nomadic tribes, supplying nomadic products to agricultural societies and vice versa. The two-way trade is termed as agriculture-nomad trade, and the Liaoxi region formed an important part for Koguryo’s agricultural-nomad trade.
Liaoxi region was a composition zone for Eurasia, and a center of agricultural-nomad trade. Since the 5th century in particular, the significance of Liaoxi extended beyond Koguryo and China into nomadic groups in inner Asia and the Silk road route. Since the 5th century, the Liaoxi began to function as a route that connects agricultural societies in China and nomad societies in inner Asia, while Koguryo’s agriculture-nomad trade gradually expanded.
The agriculture-nomad trade between Kogugyo and the Liaoxi tribes was one means to maintain political influence. Moreover, the same trade between Chinese dynasties and nomad tribes was a part of power-balancing foreign policy in the broader context of multipolar East Asian international order in the 5th-6th century. Accordingly, the Koguryo’s agriculture-nomad trade was a part of its Liaoxi policy, and carried important significance in establishing and maintaining its own hegemony in the Northeast Asia.
Yangti’s northern policy had dual purposes–permanent stability in the agriculture-nomad composition zone and acquiring full control in Silk Road-Oasis trade routes. One important outcome of this policy was expansion of East Asian trade route from western borders to Liaoxi region, and from southern China to the northern plains. Sui’s Liaoxi policy must be understood under the context of this northern policy. The offensive plan on Koguryo aimed to take control of trade not only in Liaoxi but also in Northeast Asia.
Yangti’s norther policy and offensive plan on Koguryo intended to reinforce his own imperial power. He wanted to check the elite group and strengthen his relative position, and one way to achieve this was trade and wars. Although Sui’s offensive plan on Koguryo was brought up by the elites in the mid- to late-590s, the plan now carried Yangti’s political purposes. This appears to explain the reason why Yangti continued to press for attacking Koguryo despite a series of difficulties and questions raised after the repeated defeats in the Koguryo-Sui conflicts.
Koguryo responded to Sui’s offensive aspiration through forming military alliances with neighboring states. The most significant of this effort was Koguryo’s attempt to negotiate with east Turks which had traditionally sided with Sui. The decision of East Turks could potentially influence other tribes of the Liaoxi region. Koguryo’s negotiation with Japan and Baekje took place under the similar contexts. Koguryo was trying to prevent Sui’s attempt to form alliance with them, while checking Shilla’s in order to promote stability in the southern borders.
In response to Sui’s move, Koguryo tried to exploit Sui’s logistical weakness by attacking Zhen and Shu. Sui reciprocated by attacking similar military bases such as la. A series of skirmishes around the border-area of Liaoxi looked like a prelude to a full-scale war between Koguryo and Sui. Koguryo however effectively lost military bases in Liaoxi including Muryeo-la in 611, and the war finally broke out with Sui’s army crossing the Liaohe river.
These were preventive measures against the war with Sui and decision-makers of Koguryo’s foreign policy was dominated by king and novels.
Traditional elites were also participating in the war-preparation against Sui. Koguryo’s territorial expansion effectively ceased after the 6th century and its agricultural production began to stagnate, making the trade more important. Koguryo's elites could not afford to sacrifice Liaoxi region, and this explains their commitment to fight Sui. Overall, the Koguryo-Sui war was initiated by Sui’s offensive, but Koguryo’s political decision was a part of the equation.
서지정보 내보내기(Export)
닫기소장기관 정보
닫기권호소장정보
닫기오류접수
닫기오류 접수 확인
닫기음성서비스 신청
닫기음성서비스 신청 확인
닫기이용약관
닫기학술연구정보서비스 이용약관 (2017년 1월 1일 ~ 현재 적용)
학술연구정보서비스(이하 RISS)는 정보주체의 자유와 권리 보호를 위해 「개인정보 보호법」 및 관계 법령이 정한 바를 준수하여, 적법하게 개인정보를 처리하고 안전하게 관리하고 있습니다. 이에 「개인정보 보호법」 제30조에 따라 정보주체에게 개인정보 처리에 관한 절차 및 기준을 안내하고, 이와 관련한 고충을 신속하고 원활하게 처리할 수 있도록 하기 위하여 다음과 같이 개인정보 처리방침을 수립·공개합니다.
주요 개인정보 처리 표시(라벨링)
목 차
3년
또는 회원탈퇴시까지5년
(「전자상거래 등에서의 소비자보호에 관한3년
(「전자상거래 등에서의 소비자보호에 관한2년
이상(개인정보보호위원회 : 개인정보의 안전성 확보조치 기준)개인정보파일의 명칭 | 운영근거 / 처리목적 | 개인정보파일에 기록되는 개인정보의 항목 | 보유기간 | |
---|---|---|---|---|
학술연구정보서비스 이용자 가입정보 파일 | 한국교육학술정보원법 | 필수 | ID, 비밀번호, 성명, 생년월일, 신분(직업구분), 이메일, 소속분야, 웹진메일 수신동의 여부 | 3년 또는 탈퇴시 |
선택 | 소속기관명, 소속도서관명, 학과/부서명, 학번/직원번호, 휴대전화, 주소 |
구분 | 담당자 | 연락처 |
---|---|---|
KERIS 개인정보 보호책임자 | 정보보호본부 김태우 | - 이메일 : lsy@keris.or.kr - 전화번호 : 053-714-0439 - 팩스번호 : 053-714-0195 |
KERIS 개인정보 보호담당자 | 개인정보보호부 이상엽 | |
RISS 개인정보 보호책임자 | 대학학술본부 장금연 | - 이메일 : giltizen@keris.or.kr - 전화번호 : 053-714-0149 - 팩스번호 : 053-714-0194 |
RISS 개인정보 보호담당자 | 학술진흥부 길원진 |
자동로그아웃 안내
닫기인증오류 안내
닫기귀하께서는 휴면계정 전환 후 1년동안 회원정보 수집 및 이용에 대한
재동의를 하지 않으신 관계로 개인정보가 삭제되었습니다.
(참조 : RISS 이용약관 및 개인정보처리방침)
신규회원으로 가입하여 이용 부탁 드리며, 추가 문의는 고객센터로 연락 바랍니다.
- 기존 아이디 재사용 불가
휴면계정 안내
RISS는 [표준개인정보 보호지침]에 따라 2년을 주기로 개인정보 수집·이용에 관하여 (재)동의를 받고 있으며, (재)동의를 하지 않을 경우, 휴면계정으로 전환됩니다.
(※ 휴면계정은 원문이용 및 복사/대출 서비스를 이용할 수 없습니다.)
휴면계정으로 전환된 후 1년간 회원정보 수집·이용에 대한 재동의를 하지 않을 경우, RISS에서 자동탈퇴 및 개인정보가 삭제처리 됩니다.
고객센터 1599-3122
ARS번호+1번(회원가입 및 정보수정)