Changjak Gugak as viewed in the ethnomusicological perspective
저자
발행기관
학술지명
권호사항
발행연도
2013
작성언어
-주제어
KDC
670
자료형태
학술저널
수록면
5-44(40쪽)
제공처
It has been passed more than 70 years since Changjak Gugak (newly composed works based on traditional music) started to emerge in Korean traditional music. Now Changjak Gugak is firmly established as one of the musical genres. However its critical comments have still lingered on the people who are engaged in the music domain. Their main criticism lie in that it is difficult for them to perceive any sense of Korean traditional elements in the Changjak music produced. From an ethnomusicological perspective, tradition paradoxically changes slowly, with changes from one generation to the next not being seen as significant. Even if a tradition undergoes major changes over many generations, it will still be seen as unchanged.
Changjak music is a music that was born in response to the stimuli from Western art music introduced to Korea in the early 20th century. It is, thus, inevitable as a mode of the times that Changjak music is vulnerable to be influenced by the idioms of Western music. This phenomenon is not unique and confined to Korea, but it is also in common in Asian countries such as North Korea, China, Taiwan, Hong Kong, Vietnam, Indonesia, and so forth.
This article is to examine such criticism on Changjak Gugak and as a reaction to this it is to look into it as the view of the music in a Korean culture. I have looked at first a national music (Korean music) and then Changjak Gugak. I have also investigated the perspectives on Changjak Gugak. Having selected the criticized points of these, I have looked at these issues as an ethnomusicological perspective.
In examining a number of criticisms on Changjak Gugak, most critics are the people who largely studied Western classical music. Among them most have been taking a great interest in Korean traditional music, and this is also much a concerned matter to the Korean traditional music filed. Korean music has, however, been kept throughout changes. For instance, Sanjo (highly artistic instrumental piece) has a history of a hundred-year, but its music and performance styles have been more than thirty yupas (schools). This was the result in that teachers who instructed and inherited Sanjo encouraged their students to create from its tradition. If they had tried to emphasise on following merely its tradition without its creation, today Sanjo would have remained in only 'the Kim Changjo Gayago Sanjo'. Everybody would be against it, if they insisted to preserve the 'tradition'. Changjak Gugak is continuing to transmit such creative processes.
The criticisms on Changjak Gugak can be highlighted by these phrases: "To use the staff notation in the Korean music field would be a matter of grave concern", or "It destructs its purity when the equal temperament is applied to Korean folk music", or "It is difficult to understand the affect of Korean traditional music due to its excessive commercialization", and so on.
'The music in culture' in ethnomusicology embraces all the music in the world except for Western classical music. From its definition, Korean music contains all the genres such as musics of art, folk, popular that a certain group of people practises. Thus to see the Changjak Gugak domain with the sight of seeing Western classical music is as the same as seeing popular music with the sight of western classical art one.
There are different kinds of musics in Changjak music in Korea, and they include art, popular and in-between the two. Before criticizing Changjak music, one should look at first to which such particular music belongs and then make critical comments according to the appropriate criteria.
There must be different critical standards according to a case, such as the problem of adapting a functional harmony and the equal temperament, and so on in the Changjak music world. I think such issues can naturally be understood with the change of an appreciative eye. Taking account of Changjak music from the ethnomusicological perspective, it would be necessary t
분석정보
서지정보 내보내기(Export)
닫기소장기관 정보
닫기권호소장정보
닫기오류접수
닫기오류 접수 확인
닫기음성서비스 신청
닫기음성서비스 신청 확인
닫기이용약관
닫기학술연구정보서비스 이용약관 (2017년 1월 1일 ~ 현재 적용)
학술연구정보서비스(이하 RISS)는 정보주체의 자유와 권리 보호를 위해 「개인정보 보호법」 및 관계 법령이 정한 바를 준수하여, 적법하게 개인정보를 처리하고 안전하게 관리하고 있습니다. 이에 「개인정보 보호법」 제30조에 따라 정보주체에게 개인정보 처리에 관한 절차 및 기준을 안내하고, 이와 관련한 고충을 신속하고 원활하게 처리할 수 있도록 하기 위하여 다음과 같이 개인정보 처리방침을 수립·공개합니다.
주요 개인정보 처리 표시(라벨링)
목 차
3년
또는 회원탈퇴시까지5년
(「전자상거래 등에서의 소비자보호에 관한3년
(「전자상거래 등에서의 소비자보호에 관한2년
이상(개인정보보호위원회 : 개인정보의 안전성 확보조치 기준)개인정보파일의 명칭 | 운영근거 / 처리목적 | 개인정보파일에 기록되는 개인정보의 항목 | 보유기간 | |
---|---|---|---|---|
학술연구정보서비스 이용자 가입정보 파일 | 한국교육학술정보원법 | 필수 | ID, 비밀번호, 성명, 생년월일, 신분(직업구분), 이메일, 소속분야, 웹진메일 수신동의 여부 | 3년 또는 탈퇴시 |
선택 | 소속기관명, 소속도서관명, 학과/부서명, 학번/직원번호, 휴대전화, 주소 |
구분 | 담당자 | 연락처 |
---|---|---|
KERIS 개인정보 보호책임자 | 정보보호본부 김태우 | - 이메일 : lsy@keris.or.kr - 전화번호 : 053-714-0439 - 팩스번호 : 053-714-0195 |
KERIS 개인정보 보호담당자 | 개인정보보호부 이상엽 | |
RISS 개인정보 보호책임자 | 대학학술본부 장금연 | - 이메일 : giltizen@keris.or.kr - 전화번호 : 053-714-0149 - 팩스번호 : 053-714-0194 |
RISS 개인정보 보호담당자 | 학술진흥부 길원진 |
자동로그아웃 안내
닫기인증오류 안내
닫기귀하께서는 휴면계정 전환 후 1년동안 회원정보 수집 및 이용에 대한
재동의를 하지 않으신 관계로 개인정보가 삭제되었습니다.
(참조 : RISS 이용약관 및 개인정보처리방침)
신규회원으로 가입하여 이용 부탁 드리며, 추가 문의는 고객센터로 연락 바랍니다.
- 기존 아이디 재사용 불가
휴면계정 안내
RISS는 [표준개인정보 보호지침]에 따라 2년을 주기로 개인정보 수집·이용에 관하여 (재)동의를 받고 있으며, (재)동의를 하지 않을 경우, 휴면계정으로 전환됩니다.
(※ 휴면계정은 원문이용 및 복사/대출 서비스를 이용할 수 없습니다.)
휴면계정으로 전환된 후 1년간 회원정보 수집·이용에 대한 재동의를 하지 않을 경우, RISS에서 자동탈퇴 및 개인정보가 삭제처리 됩니다.
고객센터 1599-3122
ARS번호+1번(회원가입 및 정보수정)