Types of Control in Acupuncture Clinical Trials Might Affect the Conclusion of the Trials: A Review of Acupuncture on Pain Management

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

Analgesic effects of acupuncture have been extensively studied in various clinical trials. However, the conclusion remains controversial, even among large scale randomized controlled trials. This study aimed to evaluate the association between the conclusion of the trials and the types of control used in those trials via systematic review. Published randomized controlled trials of acupuncture for pain were retrieved from electronic databases (Medline, AMED, Cochrane libraries, EMBASE, PsycINFO, Clinicaltrials.gov, and CAB Abstracts) using a prespecified search strategy. One hundred and thirty-nine studies leading to 166 pairs of acupuncture-control treatment effect comparisons (26 studies comprised of 53 intervention-control pairs) were analyzed based on the proportion of positive conclusions in different control designs. We found that treatment effects of acupuncture compared with nontreatment controls had the highest tendency to yield a positive conclusion (84.3%), compared with nonneedle-insertion controls (53.3%). Whereas with needle-insertion controls, the lowest tendency of positive conclusions was observed (37.8%). Consistently, in studies reporting successful blinding, a higher tendency of positive findings on the treatment effect of acupuncture was found in the noninsertion sham controls compared with that in the insertion sham controls. We conclude that the type of control is likely to affect the conclusion in acupuncture analgesic trials. Appropriate control should be chosen according to the aims of studies.

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

Analgesic effects of acupuncture have been extensively studied in various clinical trials. However, the conclusion remains controversial, even among large scale randomized controlled trials. This study aimed to evaluate the association between the conclusion of the trials and the types of control used in those trials via systematic review. Published randomized controlled trials of acupuncture for pain were retrieved from electronic databases (Medline, AMED, Cochrane libraries, EMBASE, PsycINFO, Clinicaltrials.gov, and CAB Abstracts) using a prespecified search strategy. One hundred and thirty-nine studies leading to 166 pairs of acupuncture-control treatment effect comparisons (26 studies comprised of 53 intervention-control pairs) were analyzed based on the proportion of positive conclusions in different control designs. We found that treatment effects of acupuncture compared with nontreatment controls had the highest tendency to yield a positive conclusion (84.3%), compared with nonneedle-insertion controls (53.3%). Whereas with needle-insertion controls, the lowest tendency of positive conclusions was observed (37.8%). Consistently, in studies reporting successful blinding, a higher tendency of positive findings on the treatment effect of acupuncture was found in the noninsertion sham controls compared with that in the insertion sham controls. We conclude that the type of control is likely to affect the conclusion in acupuncture analgesic trials. Appropriate control should be chosen according to the aims of studies.

참고문헌 (Reference)

• 1 Thompson BT, "Usual care as the control group in clinical trials of nonpharmacologic interventions" 4 : 577-582, 2007
• 2 Freedland KE, "Usual and unusual care: existing practice control groups in randomized controlled trials of behavioral interventions" 73 : 323-335, 2011
• 3 Turner JA, "The importance of placebo effects in pain treatment and research" 271 : 1609-1614, 1994
• 4 Cherkin DC, "Randomized trial comparing traditional Chinese medical acupuncture, therapeutic massage, and selfcare education for chronic low back pain" 161 : 1081-1088, 2001
• 5 White P, "Practice, practitioner, or placebo? A multifactorial, mixedmethods randomized controlled trial of acupuncture" 153 : 455-462, 2012
• 6 Lee H, "Non-penetrating sham needle, is it an adequate sham control in acupuncture research?" 19 : S41-S48, 2011
• 7 Enck P, "New insights into the placebo and nocebo responses" 59 : 195-206, 2008
• 8 Zhang R, "Mechanisms of acupuncture-electroacupuncture on persistent pain" 120 : 482-503, 2014
• 9 Irnich D, "Is sham laser a valid control for acupuncture trials?" 2011 : 485945-, 2011
• 10 White AR, "International Acupuncture Research Forum. Clinical trials of acupuncture: consensus recommendations for optimal treatment, sham controls and blinding" 9 : 237-245, 2001
• 11 Molsberger AF, "German Randomized Acupuncture Trial for chronic shoulder pain (GRASP)da pragmatic, controlled, patient-blinded, multicentre trial in an outpatient care environment" 151 : 146-154, 2010
• 12 Haake M, "German Acupuncture Trials (GERAC) for chronic low back pain: randomized, multicenter, blinded, parallel-group trial with 3 groups" 167 : 1892-1898, 2007
• 13 Wang LP, "Efficacy of acupuncture for migraine prophylaxis: a singleblinded, double-dummy, randomized controlled trial" 152 : 1864-1871, 2011
• 14 Berman BM, "Effectiveness of acupuncture as adjunctive therapy in osteoarthritis of the knee: a randomized, controlled trial" 141 : 901-910, 2004
• 15 He D, "Effect of acupuncture treatment on chronic neck and shoulder pain in sedentary female workers: a 6-month and 3-year follow-up study" 109 : 299-307, 2004
• 16 Le Bars D, "Diffuse noxious inhibitory controls (DNIC) in animals and in man" 9 : 47-56, 1991
• 17 Miller E, "Delayed effect of acupuncture treatment in OA of the knee: a blinded, randomized, controlled trial" 2011 : 792975-, 2011
• 18 Silverman HJ, "Control group selection in critical care randomized controlled trials evaluating interventional strategies: an ethical assessment" 32 : 852-857, 2004
• 19 Meng X, "Clinical acupuncture research in the West" 5 : 134-140, 2011
• 20 Lao L, "Clinical acupuncture" Springer 187-209, 2001
• 21 Madsen MV, "Acupuncture treatment for pain: Systematic review of randomized clinical trials with acupuncture, placebo acupuncture, and no acupuncture groups" 338 : a3115-, 2009
• 22 Witt C, "Acupuncture in patients with osteoarthritis of the knee:a randomized trial" 366 : 136-143, 2005
• 23 Witt CM, "Acupuncture in patients with osteoarthritis of the knee or hip: a randomized, controlled trial with an additional nonrandomized arm" 54 : 3485-3493, 2006
• 24 Vas J, "Acupuncture in patients with acute low back pain: a multicentre randomised controlled clinical trial" 153 : 1883-1889, 2012
• 25 Chen HY, "Acupuncture in pain management" Nova Science Publishers 163-172, 2014
• 26 Alecrim-Andrade J, "Acupuncture in migraine prophylaxis: a randomized sham-controlled trial" 26 : 520-529, 2006
• 27 Linde K, "Acupuncture for patients with migraine: a randomized controlled trial" 293 : 2118-2125, 2005
• 28 Cho YJ, "Acupuncture for chronic low back pain: a multicenter, randomized, patient-assessor blind, sham-controlled clinical trial" 38 : 549-557, 2013
• 29 Hinman RS, "Acupuncture for chronic knee pain: a randomized clinical trial" 312 : 1313-1322, 2014
• 30 Kennedy S, "Acupuncture for acute non-specific low back pain: a pilot randomised non-penetrating sham controlled trial" 16 : 139-146, 2008
• 31 Mavrommatis CI, "Acupuncture as an adjunctive therapy to pharmacological treatment in patients with chronic pain due to osteoarthritis of the knee: a 3-armed, randomized, placebo-controlled trial" 153 : 1720-1726, 2012
• 32 Scharf HP, "Acupuncture and knee osteoarthritis: a threearmed randomized trial" 145 : 12-20, 2006
• 33 Lin JG, "Acupuncture analgesia: a review of its mechanisms of actions" 36 : 635-645, 2008
• 34 Cherkin DC, "A randomized trial comparing acupuncture, simulated acupuncture, and usual care for chronic low back pain" 169 : 858-866, 2009
• 35 Goddard G, "A controlled trial of placebo versus real acupuncture" 6 : 237-242, 2005