蒙古의 漢族統治와 契丹官僚의 寄與 = The Chinese reign of Mongolian regime and contribution of Kitan bureaucracy

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

As it became clear through the point of arguement, Morgolian regime advanced into China and couldn’t avoid the Chinese reign. Mongolian regime had not experience in Chinese reign and appointed persons from Kitan, Jurchen and Balhae, who had much experience in Chinese reign to the bureaucracy on a large scale. These bureaucracies of different race dwelt in China a long time to assimilate in Chinese learning and were Chinesenized. Therefore they reigned Chinese, but the reign plan was different from the situation of Mongol. But Mongolian regime adhered Mongolian nomadic national spirit, the bureaucracies of different race couldn’t accompished the Chinesenization of Mongol. Eventually they were utilized in the technical point of Chinese reign. Here we observed that the policy of Chineseinzation reached limit.
As the permanent reign race do not exist historically, Jurchen who had received the reign of Kitan established Kin Dynasty(金朝), their nation-state, on the contrary this Dynasty destroyed Liao Dynasty that Kitan had established, at the same time reigned Kitan. Kin Dynasty’s fall, integrated the divided tribes. This time Kitan race took pains to accomplish the national desire which was the reconstruction of destroyed Liao.
Then Ya Yul Ryu Ga(耶律留哥), a Kitan bureaucracy who knew the real condition of Mongol as north border CHEON HO(北邊千戶) of Kin Dynasty, deserted the national desire of all Kitan and surrendered to Jinggis Khan. After all he charged a part to make be smooth Manchuria occupation of Mongol. Of course most of Kitan opposed an intimating Mongolline of Ya Yul Ryu Ga.
Kitan race met a good chance of Kin Dynasty’s fall, if they were subordinated to Mongol, they judged that the reconstruction of destroyed Liao cann’t be accomplished and opposed it. After the surrender of Ya Yul Ryu Ga, powerful Kitan leaded wondering peoples and submited to Mongol according to their judgement, or guided Mongol troops who invaded Kin Dynasty. Preferably they cooperated Mongol troops positively and make be smooth the invasion so much.
So this, the leader of Kitan desired the reconstruction of destroyed Liao, and believed Mongol troops as a liberation army, preferably Mongol judged Kitan’s cooperation as lubrication of invasion. The opposition of Kitan to intimating Mongol line of Ya Yul Ryu Ga is analyzed as repulsion to the Kitan view fo Mongol. After all the reconstruction desire failed without result. Ya Yul Ryu Ga was a person of Kitan leaders, but all Kitan didn’t follow him. Therefore the reconstruction desire of destroyod Liao failed, it derived from the dissolution of leaders. Since of the establishment of Liao, the person who occupied the highest authority on the learning ability was Ya Yul Cho Jae(耶律楚材), Dong Lan King’s(東丹王 8) gereration, he was a man of established reputation of a series of biographies of 『Yuan Sa (元史)』, the educated class including him didn’t participate in the reconstruction movement of destroyed Liao, it is analyzed as the cause of failure of the reconstruction movment.
Ya Yul Cho Jae was a self conceited person as believer or supporter to Chinese culture, had great interest about Chinesenization of Mongolian regime only, and didn’t feel interest about the reconstruction movement of Kitan actually. As this Mongolian regime confirmed the national disruption of Kitan and regarded Kitan as a helper. Accordingly the leader of Kitan was Ya Yul Ryu Ga who controled six hundred thousand persons and Jinggis Khan faced him merely. Since of Kin Dynasty’s establishment due to the invasion of Jinggis Khan, Kin Kynasty met the longest national critical monent, and dispatched an envoy who was proficient in Mongolian language and make feel a real condition of this land directly.
But the envoyes noitified Mongol that the fall of Kin Dynasty approached or promised the surender and took anti Kinic action individually.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• Ⅰ. 序論
• Ⅱ. 契丹人의 獨立鬪爭과 耶律留哥의 契丹背叛
• Ⅲ. 耶律楚材의 政治的寄與
• Ⅳ. 耶律有尙의 學問的寄與
• Ⅴ. 諸石抹氏의 寄與
• Ⅵ. 기타 契丹官僚의 寄與
• Ⅶ. 結論
• [Abstract]