선진 공여국의 국제개발 사례 분석 기반 지속가능성 리스크 프레임워크 제안 = Proposed Sustainability Risk Framework through the Analysis of Advanced Donor Countries‘ International Development Cases

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

The goal of international development projects is to assist sustainable development in recipient countries through foreign aid from donor countries. However, despite the need for both countries to negotiate and work together from the initial stages to maintain sustainability after the project, clear guidelines or standards have not been established. Additionally, despite the need for donor countries, which are relatively advanced, to understand the situation of recipient countries, many projects are donor-centric and fail to prioritize the value of sustainability. Therefore, this study extracted economic, social, and environmental risks that threaten sustainability through literature review and proposed a sustainability framework based on these criteria. To validate framework, actual international development cases conducted by advanced donor countries such as Australia, the United States, and Japan, in collaboration with South Korea, were analyzed by applying content analysis with the reports, which covers the overall contents from the planning stage to the operation stage. Analysis of sustainability perspectives focused on economy, society and the environment, advanced donor countries emphasized (1) the importance of pre-assessment, (2) the need for coordination with the local population and communities despite the existence of donor-specific values, and (3) addressing economic considerations such as pre-operational and maintenance costs, social communication with the local population, and environmental considerations starting from the initial stages of construction regarding the treatment of pollutants as values to be improved. Compared to other advanced donor countries, the Republic of Korea should also focus on consultation with local residents to achieve social integration, and improve sustainability by deployment the managers in local sites for better negotiation.The proposed framework in this study will serve as a tool to enhance communication among the countries and the locals, with the expectation of increasing project efficiency and sustainability.

참고문헌 (Reference)

• 1 박찬영 ; 한승헌 ; 정우용, "해외투자개발사업의 건설투자자와 금융투자자간 리스크 태도 분석" 한국건설관리학회 20 (20): 137-148, 2019
• 2 정진학 ; 한종훈 ; 이주성 ; 안용한, "책임형 CM 발주방식의 최대공사비보증계약 사례연구 - 미국 공공발주 프로젝트 사례 중심 -" 한국건설관리학회 20 (20): 22-30, 2019
• 3 오덕성 ; 최준성 ; Zhen Wang ; 이서정, "중국 상하이 도시재생 사업의 지속가능성 평가에 관한 연구" 한국산학기술학회 16 (16): 5627-5635, 2015
• 4 임영환, "영국의 지속가능한 건축 가이드라인의 특성 연구" 대한건축학회 29 (29): 51-58, 2013
• 5 손혁상 ; 공석기, "국제개발협력에서 개도국 NGO의 역할과 한계: 방글라데시 BRAC에 대한 비판적 고찰" 국제지역학회 19 (19): 23-46, 2015
• 6 황재희 ; 이성우, "국제개발협력사업의 지속가능성 제고 사례 연구: 말라위와 짐바브웨의 국제농업개발협력사업을 중심으로" 한국지역개발학회 31 (31): 203-218, 2019
• 7 Heale, R., "What is a case study?" 21 (21): 7-8, 2018
• 8 Amiril, A., "Transportation infrastructure project sustainability factors and performance" 153 : 90-98, 2014
• 9 Hussin, J. M., "The way forward in sustainable construction: issues and challenges" 2 (2): 15-24, 2013
• 10 Savitz, A. W., "The Triple Bottom Line: How Today’ s Best-run Companies Are Achieving Economic, Social and Environment Success –and How You Can Too" John Wiley & Sons 2006
• 11 Parkin, S., "Sustainable development: understanding the concept and practical challenge" 156 (156): 19-26, 2003
• 12 Gilmour, D., "Sustainable development indicators for major infrastructure projects" 164 (164): 15-, 2011
• 13 Ika, L. A., "Success conditions for international development capacity building projects" 35 (35): 44-63, 2017
• 14 Lee, C., "Social conflict management framework for project viability : Case studies from Korean megaprojects" 35 (35): 1683-1696, 2017
• 15 Kwon, T. W., "Proposal of hierarchical organization structure for negotiation consensus in multinational joint-client megaprojects: Case of US force relocation program in Korea" 149 (149): 05022019-, 2023
• 16 이경태 ; 안한나 ; 김주형, "Project Coordinators’ Perceptions according to the Organization Structure to Reduce Communication Risks in Multinational Project" 대한토목학회 27 (27): 915-929, 2023
• 17 Oh, K., "Performance and Implications of KOICA Development Consulting Business Case – Focusing on developmnet research projects" 8 (8): 24-37, 2013
• 18 Oleinik, A., "On the choice of measures of reliability and validity in the content-analysis of texts" 48 (48): 2703-2718, 2014
• 19 Abidin, N. Z., "Investigating the awareness and application of sustainable construction concept by Malaysian developers" 34 (34): 421-426, 2010
• 20 Sev, A., "How can the construction industry contribute to sustainable development?" 17 (17): 161-173, 2009
• 21 Lee, K. T., "Guidelines to support negotiation for sustainable international development based on hierarchical roles and responsibilities of project-based organizations" 37 (37): 04021043-, 2021
• 22 "Ex-Post Evaluation of the Irrigation Dam and Canal Construction Project in Meun District, Vientiane Province, Lao PDR" KOICA 2016
• 23 Banihashemi, S., "Critical success factors (CSFs) for integration of sustainability into construction project management practices in developing countries" 35 (35): 1103-1119, 2017
• 24 Lee, K. T., "Comparative analysis of managers’ perception in overseas construction project risks and cost overrun in actual cases : A perspective of the Republic of Korea" 22 (22): 2291-2308, 2023
• 25 Ahsan, K., "Analysis of cost and schedule performance of international development projects" 28 (28): 68-78, 2010
• 26 Martens, M. L., "An exploratory study of sustainability evaluation in project management" 11 (11): 111-117, 2017
• 27 Kyoung, H., "An Analysis of Landscape assessment through Analyzing Characteristics of Urban Landscape in Sustainable Urban Development - In Case of Subtitle New York Hudson Yard Development" 37 (37): 444-447, 2017
• 28 Shen, L. Y., "A checklist for assessing sustainability performance of construction projects" 13 (13): 273-281, 2007
• 29 Lim, Y., "A Probe on Research Direction of Sustainable Architectural Planning-In Nontechnological Ways" 26 (26): 117-126, 2010
• 30 Asian Development Bank, "2018 Annual Evaluation Review" 2018