공익사업에서 점유이전과 생활보상 = Livelihood Compensation and Transfer of Occupation in Public Works Projects

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

There is no difference between general public works projects and improvement projects under the Act on the improvement of urban areas and residential environments(Urban improvement Act) in that an expropriation adjudication is made, but in the latter case, not all land owners are subject to expropriation, but rather only a few are subject to expropriation. In the case where an expropriation adjudication is made through a long procedure for members who oppose the redevelopment project, the project implementer may request extradition on the basis of the effect of the expropriation adjudication. It should be interpreted that the compensation has been completed as an expropriation adjudication has been made for union members those who opposing the project.
On the other hand, tenants of improvement projects are those who lose the right to use profits earlier than other public works projects due to the suspension of use. It should be interpreted that the Livelihood compensation prescribed by the Act in acquisition of and compensation for land etc. for public works projects(Land Compensation Act), such as housing transfer expenses, in the extradition claim litigation against them is in the relationship of prior or concurrent Performance. In particular, since the project implementer’s extradition claim litigation against them is an expropriation lawsuit, it must be interpreted so that a fair compensation (Article 23, Paragraph 3 of the Constitution) is made within the procedure. If the Livelihood compensation is not paid to the tenant, the compensation cannot be considered complete.
The purpose of stipulating administrative vicarious execution under the Land Compensation Act takes into account the unique public law situation in which the expropriation and compensation stipulated by the Land Compensation Act are enforced. However, the Supreme Court excluded the power of eviction from the power of execution under the Land Compensation Law, and as a result separated the issue of compensation under the Land Compensation Law from the civil lawsuit. This ruling contributed to some extent in protecting the human rights of owners and tenants, but on the other hand, as the extradition claim litigation was identified as a simple civil lawsuit, it was insulated from the compensation system under the Land Compensation Act. In the long term, all Livelihood compensation under the Land Compensation Act must be incorporated into the compensation object of the expropriation adjudication, and an expropriation adjudication including this must be made. As in the present, at least the practice of the civil lawsuit should be changed in the form of a party lawsuit under public law.
In the Party lawsuit, it is recognized that the obligation to transfer possession under the Land Compensation Act or the suspension of use under the Urban Improvement Act is recognized as a public law regulation, and whether it is linked to legitimate compensation should be carefully examined.

참고문헌 (Reference)

• 1 송동수, "행정상 강제집행제도의 비교법적 검토 - 독일과 한국을 중심으로 -" 한국토지공법학회 64 : 257-275, 2014
• 2 김동희, "행정법Ⅰ" 박영사 2021
• 3 김철용, "행정법" 고시계사 2021
• 4 김세규, "행정대집행에 관한 소고" 한국비교공법학회 11 (11): 183-209, 2010
• 5 이상덕, "행정대집행과 민사소송의 관계" 박영사 2016
• 6 한국감정원, "해설 토지보상법"
• 7 박균성, "토지보상행정법" 박영사 2014
• 8 차태환, "토지보상법론" 부연사 2009
• 9 김종보, "조합원 분양계약의 위법성" 사법발전재단 1 (1): 3-35, 2013
• 10 최승원, "정당보상으로서의 생활보상 ― 독일 연방건설법전상의 생활보상을 중심으로 ―" 행정법이론실무학회 (34) : 199-227, 2012
• 11 김종보, "재개발사업의 철거와 세입자보상" 행정법이론실무학회 (23) : 109-135, 2009
• 12 강신은, "재개발사업에 따른 수용과 손실보상" (2) : 2019
• 13 김종보, "이주대책의 개념과 특별공급의 적용법조" 행정법이론실무학회 (28) : 163-182, 2010
• 14 나채준, "생활보상제도에 대한 재검토" 한국토지공법학회 49 : 33-58, 2010
• 15 김승종, "생활보상의 법적 성격에 관한 연구 - 대법원 판례에 대한 비판적 검토를 중심으로 -" 서울시립대학교 법학연구소 23 (23): 41-66, 2015
• 16 류지태, "생활보상 논의의 비판적 검토" 한국부동산연구원 15 (15): 127-152, 2005
• 17 류해웅, "생활권보상의 법리와 제도에 관한 고찰" 한국부동산연구원 15 (15): 69-98, 2005
• 18 송명호, "관리처분계획의 인가고시가 정비구역 내 권리자들의 사용 · 수익권에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구" 대한변호사협회 (397) : 61-92, 2009
• 19 김종보, "공용환권의 개념과 법적 효과" 행정법이론실무학회 (31) : 23-50, 2011
• 20 김종보, "건설법의 이해" 피데스 2018
• 21 중앙토지수용위원회, "2021 토지수용업무편람"