舊蘇聯의 經濟發展過程에 대한 評價와 統一에의 合意 = An Evaluation to the Economic Development of the Former U.S.S.R.
저자
張原碩 (檀國大學校 農科大學 協同組合論)
발행기관
학술지명
권호사항
발행연도
1993
작성언어
Korean
KDC
300.000
자료형태
학술저널
수록면
345-362(18쪽)
제공처
소장기관
The former U.S.S.R. inevitably adopted heavy industry prioity polioity not only on Marx-Leninist doctrines of socialist economy but also on the condition that she had been surrounded by the capitalist states and her economy had also been underdeveloped. On the purpose of supplying investment fund, it was based on the sacrifice of light industry and agriculture and constraint of consumption. With all the considerable cussess in construction of socialist economy, beaurocratism has been widely spead on the course industrialization and agricultural collectivization.
Economic Reform carried out after the second world war was intented to solve the problems of socalled 'Stalinism'. It can be abbreviated to the democratization of planning system and enlarged the introduction of economic incentives, and the way of industrialisation came to be on the course of changing from the extensive into the intensive. The scope of economic reform include not only economic field such as price, profit, incentive system, finance, banking, production and sale and international economic relation, but also poilitical field such as plannig mechanism, economic managerial system and administrative system. But the experiance of both wartime communism and new economic policy(NEP) made the principle, way and content of economic reform drift about because of variety of etimation of construction of socialist economy in Stalin era. In short, economic reform wobbled because the result generated in course of industrialisation and agricunltural collectivization in that era had both been remarkable and created many problems unnegligible. Unstabilty of economic reform has resulted in structure generating inactivity of efficiency and productivity, as it has not overcome beaurocratic problems and the socialist passion has cooled down because it has not attracted direct producer's interest into production process.
We can eaily expect that North Korea connot be any exception of this experiance of socialism. Rather North Korea took anintensified form of planned economy, adhering to centralized planned economy, politically preferred economic process and doctrine of self-efforted economy known as one of autarky. Considered in the lately circumstance, North Korea is expected to have taken difficulties, internally shortage of daily necessaries because of ill-balanced structure, underdevelopment of fundamental industry such as energy and steel, and externally accumulated debt that has been paid in hard currency nowadays. With all these situation, it is of worth noticing in relation to the furture of North Korea's economy that since 70's tchnocrat has spread in the administrative organisation on the behalf of revolutionist from anti-Japan partisan and in recent years North Korea has made efforts to improve international economic relation.
A third alternative economic system is to be summarized as a properly propotionate combination of private and public economy, which could be one of harmonious forms between capitalist and socialist system, agreeable to both South and North Korea. What I would lay emphasis on is that beauroertic dictatorship cannot enter into cooperative union for it is organised to pursue economic benefit in the form of mutual aid guaranteeing autonomous management and voluntary partivipation.
The system for unification should be based on private ownership and market mechanism of pricing and demand-supply balancing that can also patially take one of the forms decentered planning mechanism within the limit of not obstucting autonomy. By doing so, antagonostic relation between socialism and capitalism can be perished away in that urgent problems can be overcome. And What the experiance of socialist economy implies is that it is important to establish democracy.
In short, elements of desirable economic system are activation of competitive market, establishament of system of social commom consent for fair order, democratic intervention of state, guarantee of fullfillment of necessaries and need for human life and so on.
Interchange of inter of outer sectoral copital, technology, resource, products and so on will be expanded in the course of cooperation between South and North Korea. By the approach to take the merits and to discard demerits of both economic systems, social instability can be removed and economic cooperation can be maintained to be enlarged.
서지정보 내보내기(Export)
닫기소장기관 정보
닫기권호소장정보
닫기오류접수
닫기오류 접수 확인
닫기음성서비스 신청
닫기음성서비스 신청 확인
닫기이용약관
닫기학술연구정보서비스 이용약관 (2017년 1월 1일 ~ 현재 적용)
학술연구정보서비스(이하 RISS)는 정보주체의 자유와 권리 보호를 위해 「개인정보 보호법」 및 관계 법령이 정한 바를 준수하여, 적법하게 개인정보를 처리하고 안전하게 관리하고 있습니다. 이에 「개인정보 보호법」 제30조에 따라 정보주체에게 개인정보 처리에 관한 절차 및 기준을 안내하고, 이와 관련한 고충을 신속하고 원활하게 처리할 수 있도록 하기 위하여 다음과 같이 개인정보 처리방침을 수립·공개합니다.
주요 개인정보 처리 표시(라벨링)
목 차
3년
또는 회원탈퇴시까지5년
(「전자상거래 등에서의 소비자보호에 관한3년
(「전자상거래 등에서의 소비자보호에 관한2년
이상(개인정보보호위원회 : 개인정보의 안전성 확보조치 기준)개인정보파일의 명칭 | 운영근거 / 처리목적 | 개인정보파일에 기록되는 개인정보의 항목 | 보유기간 | |
---|---|---|---|---|
학술연구정보서비스 이용자 가입정보 파일 | 한국교육학술정보원법 | 필수 | ID, 비밀번호, 성명, 생년월일, 신분(직업구분), 이메일, 소속분야, 웹진메일 수신동의 여부 | 3년 또는 탈퇴시 |
선택 | 소속기관명, 소속도서관명, 학과/부서명, 학번/직원번호, 휴대전화, 주소 |
구분 | 담당자 | 연락처 |
---|---|---|
KERIS 개인정보 보호책임자 | 정보보호본부 김태우 | - 이메일 : lsy@keris.or.kr - 전화번호 : 053-714-0439 - 팩스번호 : 053-714-0195 |
KERIS 개인정보 보호담당자 | 개인정보보호부 이상엽 | |
RISS 개인정보 보호책임자 | 대학학술본부 장금연 | - 이메일 : giltizen@keris.or.kr - 전화번호 : 053-714-0149 - 팩스번호 : 053-714-0194 |
RISS 개인정보 보호담당자 | 학술진흥부 길원진 |
자동로그아웃 안내
닫기인증오류 안내
닫기귀하께서는 휴면계정 전환 후 1년동안 회원정보 수집 및 이용에 대한
재동의를 하지 않으신 관계로 개인정보가 삭제되었습니다.
(참조 : RISS 이용약관 및 개인정보처리방침)
신규회원으로 가입하여 이용 부탁 드리며, 추가 문의는 고객센터로 연락 바랍니다.
- 기존 아이디 재사용 불가
휴면계정 안내
RISS는 [표준개인정보 보호지침]에 따라 2년을 주기로 개인정보 수집·이용에 관하여 (재)동의를 받고 있으며, (재)동의를 하지 않을 경우, 휴면계정으로 전환됩니다.
(※ 휴면계정은 원문이용 및 복사/대출 서비스를 이용할 수 없습니다.)
휴면계정으로 전환된 후 1년간 회원정보 수집·이용에 대한 재동의를 하지 않을 경우, RISS에서 자동탈퇴 및 개인정보가 삭제처리 됩니다.
고객센터 1599-3122
ARS번호+1번(회원가입 및 정보수정)