멧돼지(Sus scrofa) 서식지 및 이동 특성을 고려한 연결성 모델링 연구 = A Study on the Connectivity Modeling Considering the Habitat and Movement Characteristics of Wild Boars (Sus scrofa)

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

Wild boars(Sus scrofa) are expanding their range of behavior as their habitats change. Appearing in urban centers and private houses, it caused various social problems, including damage to crops. In order to prevent damage and effectively manage wild boars, there is a need for ecological research considering the characteristics and movement characteristics of wild boars. The purpose of this study is to analyze home range and identify land cover types in key areas through tracking wild boars, and to predict the movement connectivity of wild boars in consideration of previous studies and their preferred land use characteristics. In this study, from January to June 2021, four wild boars were captured and tracked in Jinju city, Gyeongsangnam-do, and the preferred land cover type of wild boars was identified based on the MCP 100%, KDE 95%, and KDE 50% results. As a result of the analysis of the home range for each individual, it was found that 100% of MCP was about 0.68㎢, 2.77㎢, 2.42㎢, and 0.16㎢, and the three individuals overlapped the home range, refraining from habitat movement and staying in the preferred area. The core areas were analyzed as about 0.55㎢, 2.05㎢, 0.82㎢, and 0.14㎢ with KDE 95%., and about 0.011㎢, 0.033㎢, 0.004㎢, and 0.003㎢ with KDE 50%. When the preferred land cover type of wild boar was confirmed based on the results of analysis of the total home range area and core area that combined all individuals, forests were 55.49% (MCP 100%), 54.00% (KDE 95%), 77.69% (KDE 50%), respectively, with the highest ratio, and the urbanization area, grassland, and agricultural area were relatively high. A connectivity scenario was constructed in which the ratio of the land cover type preferred by the analyzed wild boar was reflected as a weight for the resistance value of the connectivity analysis, and this was compared with the connectivity evaluation results analyzed based on previous studies and wild boar characteristics. When the current density values ​​for the wild boar movement data were compared, the average value of the existing scenario was 2.76, the minimum 1.12, and the maximum 4.36, and the weighted scenario had an average value of 2.84, the minimum 0.96, and the maximum 4.65. It was confirmed that, on average, the probability of movement predictability was about 2.90% better even though the weighted scenario had movement restrictions due to large resistance values. It is expected that the identification of the movement route through the movement connectivity analysis of wild boars can be suggested as an alternative to prevent damage by predicting the point of appearance. In the future, when analyzing the connectivity of species including wild boar, it is judged that it will be effective to use movement data on actual species.

참고문헌 (Reference)

• 1 고찬우 ; 조원희 ; 황병묵 ; 고동욱 ; 강완모, "행위자 기반 모형을 활용한 아프리카돼지열병 확산 분석" 한국지적정보학회 23 (23): 87-98, 2021
• 2 최태영 ; 이윤수 ; 박종화, "지리산의 멧돼지 Sus scrofa 행동권" 한국생태학회 29 (29): 253-257, 2006
• 3 한상현 ; 오장근 ; 조인철 ; 고문석 ; 김태욱 ; 장민호 ; 김병수 ; 박수곤 ; 오홍식, "제주도 한라산에 서식하는 도입종 야생멧돼지에 대한 분자유전학적 분석" 한국환경생태학회 25 (25): 658-665, 2011
• 4 윤은주 ; 김은영 ; 김지연 ; 이동근, "생태축 제안을 위한 회로 이론 기초 연결성 평가" 한국환경영향평가학회 28 (28): 275-286, 2019
• 5 김민경 ; 이상임 ; 박효민 ; 이상돈, "비침습 샘플 DNA 분석으로 유추한 영월 한반도습지 내 멧돼지(Sus scrofa)의 생태 연구" 한국환경영향평가학회 29 (29): 230-238, 2020
• 6 金源明, "멧돼지(sus scrofa coreanus heude)의 棲息地利用 硏究를 위한 radio-telemetry의 적용시험" 高麗大學校 大學院 1995
• 7 이성민 ; 이은재 ; 박희복 ; 서창완, "멧돼지(Sus scrofa)에 의한 농작물 피해 요인 분석‐경남 거창군 사례를 중심으로‐" 한국환경생태학회 32 (32): 140-146, 2018
• 8 송장훈 ; 최으뜸 ; 서호진, "대한민국에서 멧돼지 포획을 위한 두 가지 유인먹이에 대한 반응과 상자형 포획트랩 이용" 한국유기농업학회 26 (26): 381-391, 2018
• 9 김슬옹 ; 권관익 ; 김태수 ; 고현서 ; 장갑수, "경상남도 농경지에서 멧돼지에 의한 피해 경향 분석" 한국환경복원기술학회 17 (17): 17-27, 2014
• 10 이성민 ; 이우신, "경남 거창 농경지 멧돼지(Sus scrofa)의 식이물 분석" 한국산림과학회 103 (103): 307-312, 2014
• 11 Dong-Uk Ju ; Kwang Jung ; Cheon-Seok Ohk ; Sung-Sik Kim ; Gil-Ho Ahn, "경기도 북부지역 야생멧돼지(Sus scrofa) 전염성 질병 감염 실태 조사" 한국동물위생학회 43 (43): 155-159, 2020
• 12 Seo, CW, "Wild boar(Sus scrofa coreanus Heude)Habitat Modeling Using GIS and Logistic Regression" 8 (8): 85-99, 2000
• 13 Massei, G., "Wild boar populations up, numbers of hunters down? A review of trends and implications for Europe" 71 (71): 492-500, 2015
• 14 National Institute of Biological Resources, "Wild boar managementⅠ" National Institute of Biological Resources 2019
• 15 노백호, "Using habitat suitability model for the wild boar (Sus scrofa Linnaeus) to select wildlife passage sites in extensively disturbed temperate forests" 한국생태학회 38 (38): 163-173, 2015
• 16 Michez, A., "Use of unmanned aerial system to assess wildlife(Sus scrofa)damage to crops(Zea mays)" 4 (4): 266-275, 2016
• 17 Allwin, B., "The wild pig(Sus scrofa)behavior–a retrospective study" 7 (7): 2016
• 18 Sáaez‐Royuela, C., "The increased population of the wild boar (Sus scrofa L.) in Europe" 16 (16): 97-101, 1986
• 19 Risch, D. R., "The global impact of wild pigs(Sus scrofa)on terrestrial biodiversity" 11 (11): 1-10, 2021
• 20 Massei, G., "The environmental impact of wild boar" 16 (16): 135-145, 2004
• 21 Koen, E. L., "The effect of map boundary on estimates of landscape resistance to animal movement" 5 (5): e11785-, 2010
• 22 Carroll, K. A., "Testing landscape resistance layers and modeling connectivity for wolverines in the western United States" 23 : e01125-, 2020
• 23 Caruso, N., "Summer habitat use and activity patterns of wild boar Sus scrofa in rangelands of central Argentina" 13 (13): e0206513-, 2018
• 24 Wilson, C. J., "Rooting damage to farmland in Dorset, southern England, caused by feral wild boar Sus scrofa" 34 (34): 331-335, 2004
• 25 Keuling, O., "Regulating wild boar populations is"somebody else's problem"!-Human dimension in wild boar management" 554 : 311-319, 2016
• 26 Schley, L., "Patterns of crop damage by wild boar(Sus scrofa)in Luxembourg over a 10-year period" 54 (54): 589-599, 2008
• 27 Marrotte, R. R., "Multi-species genetic connectivity in a terrestrial habitat network" 5 (5): 1-11, 2017
• 28 Keuling, O., "Mortality rates of wild boar Sus scrofa L. in central Europe" 59 (59): 805-814, 2013
• 29 Algeo, T. P, "Modeling raccoon(Procyon lotor)habitat connectivity to identify potential corridors for rabies spread" 2 (2): 44-, 2017
• 30 Koen, E. L, "Landscape connectivity for wildlife : development and validation of multispecies linkage maps" 5 (5): 626-633, 2014
• 31 Jinju, "Jinju City Press Release"
• 32 Desrochers, A., "Integrating GIS and homing experiments to study avian movement costs" 26 (26): 47-58, 2011
• 33 Amici, A., "Increase in crop damage caused by wild boar (Sus scrofa L.): the “refuge effect”" 32 (32): 683-692, 2012
• 34 Barrios-Garcia, M. N., "Impact of wild boar(Sus scrofa)in its introduced and native range : a review" 14 (14): 2283-2300, 2012
• 35 Killian, G., "Immunocontraception of Florida feral swine with a single dose GnRH vaccine" 55 (55): 378-384, 2006
• 36 Keuling, O., "How does hunting influence activity and spatial usage in wild boar Sus scrofa L.?" 54 (54): 729-737, 2008
• 37 Kim, HR, "Home Range analysis of Wild boars (Sus scrofa ) in Heuimangbong (peak)of Hallyeohaesang National Park" 8 (8): 133-137, 2017
• 38 Lewis, J. S., "Historical, current, and potential population size estimates of invasive wild pigs(Sus scrofa)in the United States" 21 (21): 2373-2384, 2019
• 39 Thurf jell, H., "Habitat use and spatial patterns of wild boar Sus scrofa (L.): agricultural fields and edges" 55 (55): 517-523, 2009
• 40 Lee, WS, "Habitat Use Characteristics and Development of DamagePrevention Technique in Wild Boar (Sus scrofa)" Korea Environmetnal Industry & Technology Institute 2014
• 41 Łabudzki, L., "Forest habitats use by wild boar in the Zielonka Game Investigation Centre" 8 (8): 51-57, 2009
• 42 Giménez-Anaya, A., "Food habits of wild boars(Sus scrofa)in a Mediterranean coastal wetland" 28 (28): 197-203, 2008
• 43 National Institute of Biological Resources, "Final report onvertebrate animals of Korea (2nd stage, 3Year)" Research report to National Institute of Biological Resources 2012
• 44 Acevedo, P., "Factors affecting wild boar abundance across an environmental gradient in Spain" 51 (51): 327-336, 2006
• 45 Cai, J., "Factors affecting crop damage by wild boar and methods of mitigation in a giant panda reserve" 54 (54): 723-728, 2008
• 46 Naidoo, R., "Evaluating the effectiveness of local-and regional-scale wildlife corridors using quantitative metrics of functional connectivity" 217 : 96-103, 2018
• 47 Thurfjell, H., "Effects of hunting on wild boar Sus scrofa behaviour" 19 (19): 87-93, 2013
• 48 Scillitani, L., "Do intensive drive hunts affect wild boar(Sus scrofa)spatial behaviour in Italy? Some evidences and management implications" 56 (56): 307-318, 2010
• 49 Gortázar, C., "Diseases shared between wildlife and livestock : a European perspective" 53 (53): 241-256, 2007
• 50 Park, CR, "Development of a GIS-based habitat suitability model for wild boar Sus scrofa in the Mt. Baekwoonsan region, Korea" 28 (28): 17-21, 2003
• 51 Kim WJ, "Development of Habitat Suitability Analysis Models for Wild Boar(Sus Scrofa ) : A Case Study of Mt. Sulak and Mt. Jumbong" 6 (6): 247-256, 1998
• 52 McRae, B. H., "Circuitscape User’s Guide. ONLINE"
• 53 Melis, C., "Biogeographical variation in the population density of wild boar(Sus scrofa)in western Eurasia" 33 (33): 803-811, 2006
• 54 Pelletier, D., "Applying circuit theory for corridor expansion and management at regional scales : tiling, pinch points, and omnidirectional connectivity" 9 (9): e84135-, 2014
• 55 National Institute of Biological Resources, "2015 Wildlife Survey" National Institute of Biological Resources 2015