近代化過程에 있어서의 企業家精神에 關한 硏究 : 特히 막스·웨버(Max Weber)의 企業家精神을 中心으로

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

CHAPTER I PROLOGUE
THIS ESSAY is to study the spirit of entrepreneur in the Process of Modernization, expecially attempting to the retically analyse Max Weber's the spirit of capitalism = the Spirit of Entrepreneur. As the fact indicates today that how important it is for an Entrepreneur's spiritual attitude toward the modernization of underdeveloped countries, it is considerable that studies of the Spirit of Entrepreneur is a such important issue for us.
Historically, as we see, the Process of Modernization was affected by organical balance of power-external conditions such as technical development, exploit market, accumilation of capital in terms of money, sufficient labor force, and internal conditions- the Spirit of Entrepreneur (individual who carry out innovations), the goal of this essay is to study the spirit of entrepreneur, involving its role and influence in the Process of Modernization.
And to pinpoint corelationship between the Process of Modernization and the Spirit of Entrepreneur by adding comments of Max Weber's proof. In order to accomplish above goals, the summary of this essay is as follow:
CHAPTER II THE PROTESTANT ETHIC AND THE SPIRIT OF ENTREPRENEUR (Die protestantische Ethik und der Geist des Unternehmer).
The epoch of ethical conception of Protestantism was in the Martin Luther's time, expecially based on Jean Calvin's proof the ascetic and religious living attitude.
The ascetic of protestant ethics derived from Protestantism had accelerated the economic development which was one of the organizational factor of modern capitalism and modern civilization and rational livin attitude based on the conception of Calling (Beruf). Two different viewpoints on the entrepreneural ethics by Max Weber and Adam Smith; Max Weber emphasized the spirit of asceticism such as Industry, Frugality and Prudence, etc and Adam Smith believe in only the pursuit of profit is the purpose of entrepreneural activity. The aspect of the spirit of entrepreneur varied upon historical change. In traditionalism, pre-modernic social order and status order strongly affected to maintain economic ethics, however, in surmounting the traditionalism of the past, tradition in middle age, ethical and religious hinderances were removed and freely proceeded for pursuit of profit. The peculiarity of modrn capitalisitc profit acquisition is that it is doneleagally. And according to Max Weber, the peculiarity of modern capitalism is the leagality and the bourgeois capitalism. And so we can see that the spirit of entrepreneur is found on particular religion called Puritanism as far as Max Weber' ethos concerns.
CHAPTER III MODERNIZATION AND MAX WEBER'S THE SPIRIT OF ENTREPRENEUR.
For the motive forces of economic and social modernization, capital, labor force, industrial fuel and natural resources (coal and steel mine) should be available, and also machinery inventions, technological development and the external conditions must be available along with the spirit of an entrepreneur which are mutually concerned, harmonized and accelerated the modernization.
Therefore, the spiritual attitude of the entrepreneur had tremendously affected in the modernization. For instance, particularly, the modernization (the First Industrial Revolution) of England coupled with external conditions and internal conditions of which the spirit of entrepreneur amazingly acted as booster resulted in standing ahead of Germany, France and other Western countries.
CHAPTER IV MANAGEMENT PHILOSOPHY AND THE SPIRIT OF ENTREPRENEUR.
In the Business History, problems relation to management philosophy of entrepreneur, innovation and entrepreneur are still remaining unanswered clearly all over the world, furthermore, social relation of entrepreneural management in the capitalistic society and or responsibility of society are vitally subject to discuss and that it is very worthy to theoretically analyse the management philosophy of manager innovation and entrepreneur. The right and authority were given by society for free business operation to a business manager as for the society approve that the business activities contribute social benefit. Nevertheless, the business operation right is responsible for operation within the ethic and moral standards of which society it belongs and a greater responsivility is given to leading businessmen to obey social rules established in the society they belong to. This thought explains the meaning of social responsibility of business as Peter F. Drucker explained.
Also Professor J.A. Schumpeter explained in his Business Cycles, volume l, p.102 that the entrepreneur himself is an economic subject in carrying out innovation. Specifically, the entrepreneur is Creative Entrepreneur (scho¨pferischer Unternehmer).
CHAPTER V CONCLUSION
The study of the Spirit of Entrepreneur in the Process of Modernization disclosed the following conclusion:
1. The motivations of the first industrial revolution of the England were not only the sufficient external conditions such as capital and natural resources (coal and steel mine, etc.) but also the internal conditions - the spirit of capitalism, the spirit of entrepreneur were an essential existence in the industrial revolution.
2. The Spirit of Entrepreneur has been continuously varied upon historical changes. Max Weber who claimed that the purpose of the Creed of spirit of entrepreneur is the ascetic ethics from strict Puritan religious life while criticized by Brentano, Tawnety, and Sombar who claimed on acquisitionm pursuit of profit (auri sacrafames). The essay of Peter F. Brucker indicates that the spirit of entrepreneur is not the " auri sacra fames" as Brentanom Tawney and Sombart claims nor Max Weber's ethics but he explains that social responsibility of business is to coincide with social common-wealth. I, indeed, agree with Peter F.Drucker viewpoints-as business of today should not be bound up with simple private sphere but it should be understood as a certain social organization.
3. The spirit of the entrepreneur of Max Weber, expecially emphasized Ethos concept, was a spiritual origin of the religious thoughts of Jean Calvin or Marin Luther of the Reformation.
4. I conclude that the true entrepreneur is the one with the ascetic ethics; Industry, Frugality and Prudence, etc. as Max Weber's theory and one who carries out innovation function as J.A. Schumpeter claimed.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• 목차
• 第1章 序論 = 1
• 第2章 프로테스탄티즘(protestantism)의 倫理와 企業象精神 = 8
• 第1節 企業家의 倫理的觀念 = 9
• 第2節 Max Weber의 倫理的觀念과 企業家精神 = 19
• 第3節 企業家精神의 변모 = 29
• 第3章 近代化와 Max Weber의 企業家精神 = 35
• 第1節 英·美國의 近代化와 企業家精神 = 36
• 第2節 西毆및 日本의 近代化와 企業家精神 = 49
• 第3節 近代化와 Max Weber의 企業家精神 = 57
• 第4章 經營哲學과 企業家精神 = 63
• 第1節 企業經營者의 經營哲學 = 63
• 第2節 革新과 企業家精神 = 72
• 第3節 企業經營과 企業家精神 = 82
• 第5章 結論 = 87
• 參考文獻 = 91