KCI등재
소련 역사 속의 스탈린 시대
저자
발행기관
학술지명
권호사항
발행연도
2002
작성언어
-KDC
900
등재정보
KCI등재
자료형태
학술저널
수록면
89-122(34쪽)
제공처
소장기관
This paper deals with the Historiography on the Stalin era in Soviet/Russian History. It attempts to introduce the trend of research about the Stalin era as a way to overview the academic achievement of the past decades and stimulate further study.
Scholars use the Stalin era in Soviet/Russian History as Stalinism or the Stalinist system etc. in different terms. There are not united technical terms. Still, we don t have any united technical terms about the Stalin era. Nevertheless within the field of Soviet studies, Stalinism has been the central problem and mystery that has preoccupied generations of scholars. It was in the Stalin period, conventionally dated from 1929 to Stalin s death in 1953, that the shape of the new order, product of the Bolshevik revolution 1917, was established. This was the era in which the Soviet Union was at its most dynamic, engaging in social and economic experiments that some hailed as the future become manifest and others saw as a threat to civilization. The Soviet (Stalinist) system is a complex of political and economic institutions, values, and cultural practices.
Similarities between the two great antagonists of the democracies, the Soviet Union and Nazi Germany, generalized in the so-called totalitarian model, made a great impact on Western scholarship and public opinion in the decades following the Second World War. The totalitarian school dominate US Sovietology, and not surprisingly sought the key to Stalinism in its political system, characterized totalitarian. The totalitarian regimes aim to break down class loyalties and civil society in order to create lonely, atomised individuals with no private space of their own, who can thus be easily used to serve the state s interests.
From the late 1950s onwards, many scholars reacted against the totalitarian school. Some claimed that it was a politicised term that had been designed to highlight differences between the Soviet Union and the West. Especially in the 1970 s, this was challenged by a new generation consisting mainly of social historians who wanted to bring society back in and write history from below as well from above. Thus much scholarship of the Stalin era has been labelled revisionist. Yet revisionist historians often differ widely amongst themselves. To distinguish them, it has been helpfully suggested that there have been two generations of revisionists. First generation revisionists, like S. Cohen, M. Lewin and R. Tucker declared that the totalitarian model did not apply to the pre-Stalin regime. A second generation, often with a particular interest in social history, argued against totalitarian perspectives in general.
In the 1970s and 1980s, the totalitarian-versus-revisionist debate preoccupied Soviet studies. One was the political: revisionists thought the old-timers were full og Cold War prejudice, while traditional Sovietologists thought the revisionists were whitewashers of the Soviet Union. Another was disciplinary : old-time Sovietology was dominated by model-oriented political scientists, revisionism by empirically-oriented social historians. By disposing of the Soviet Union, 1991 made the question of being for or against it irrelevant. As for the disciplines, social historians flourished and multiplied in the 1980s.
The main thrust of 1970s revisionism was to show that Soviet society was something more than just a passive object of the regime s manipulation and mobilization, as totalitarian theorists suggested. Revisionists also pointed to upward mobility from the working class as a means of elite formation and source of legitimacy for the regime, and argued that the Soviet Communist Party of the 1930s was incapable of exerting the pervasive totalitarian control attributed to it.
In 1991 with the collapse of the Soviet Union, the new scholarship on Stalinism emerges. They moves towards cultural approaches, and are thus the third big shift in Soviet studies. Th
서지정보 내보내기(Export)
닫기소장기관 정보
닫기권호소장정보
닫기오류접수
닫기오류 접수 확인
닫기음성서비스 신청
닫기음성서비스 신청 확인
닫기이용약관
닫기학술연구정보서비스 이용약관 (2017년 1월 1일 ~ 현재 적용)
학술연구정보서비스(이하 RISS)는 정보주체의 자유와 권리 보호를 위해 「개인정보 보호법」 및 관계 법령이 정한 바를 준수하여, 적법하게 개인정보를 처리하고 안전하게 관리하고 있습니다. 이에 「개인정보 보호법」 제30조에 따라 정보주체에게 개인정보 처리에 관한 절차 및 기준을 안내하고, 이와 관련한 고충을 신속하고 원활하게 처리할 수 있도록 하기 위하여 다음과 같이 개인정보 처리방침을 수립·공개합니다.
주요 개인정보 처리 표시(라벨링)
목 차
3년
또는 회원탈퇴시까지5년
(「전자상거래 등에서의 소비자보호에 관한3년
(「전자상거래 등에서의 소비자보호에 관한2년
이상(개인정보보호위원회 : 개인정보의 안전성 확보조치 기준)개인정보파일의 명칭 | 운영근거 / 처리목적 | 개인정보파일에 기록되는 개인정보의 항목 | 보유기간 | |
---|---|---|---|---|
학술연구정보서비스 이용자 가입정보 파일 | 한국교육학술정보원법 | 필수 | ID, 비밀번호, 성명, 생년월일, 신분(직업구분), 이메일, 소속분야, 웹진메일 수신동의 여부 | 3년 또는 탈퇴시 |
선택 | 소속기관명, 소속도서관명, 학과/부서명, 학번/직원번호, 휴대전화, 주소 |
구분 | 담당자 | 연락처 |
---|---|---|
KERIS 개인정보 보호책임자 | 정보보호본부 김태우 | - 이메일 : lsy@keris.or.kr - 전화번호 : 053-714-0439 - 팩스번호 : 053-714-0195 |
KERIS 개인정보 보호담당자 | 개인정보보호부 이상엽 | |
RISS 개인정보 보호책임자 | 대학학술본부 장금연 | - 이메일 : giltizen@keris.or.kr - 전화번호 : 053-714-0149 - 팩스번호 : 053-714-0194 |
RISS 개인정보 보호담당자 | 학술진흥부 길원진 |
자동로그아웃 안내
닫기인증오류 안내
닫기귀하께서는 휴면계정 전환 후 1년동안 회원정보 수집 및 이용에 대한
재동의를 하지 않으신 관계로 개인정보가 삭제되었습니다.
(참조 : RISS 이용약관 및 개인정보처리방침)
신규회원으로 가입하여 이용 부탁 드리며, 추가 문의는 고객센터로 연락 바랍니다.
- 기존 아이디 재사용 불가
휴면계정 안내
RISS는 [표준개인정보 보호지침]에 따라 2년을 주기로 개인정보 수집·이용에 관하여 (재)동의를 받고 있으며, (재)동의를 하지 않을 경우, 휴면계정으로 전환됩니다.
(※ 휴면계정은 원문이용 및 복사/대출 서비스를 이용할 수 없습니다.)
휴면계정으로 전환된 후 1년간 회원정보 수집·이용에 대한 재동의를 하지 않을 경우, RISS에서 자동탈퇴 및 개인정보가 삭제처리 됩니다.
고객센터 1599-3122
ARS번호+1번(회원가입 및 정보수정)