심리생리검사 결과의 증거능력에 관한 소고 = A Study on the Admissibility of Psychophysiological Detection of Deception(PDD) Test Results

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

The psychophysiological detection of deception (PDD) test is a scientific investigative technique widely used in many cases, but its admissibility of evidence remains controversial, and the Supreme Court has negative views on it. In recent decades, however, PDD devices and analysis techniques have advanced significantly, and many scientific studies have confirmed their accuracy. Due to their sufficient probative value, PDD test results are deemed to be admissible as evidence in criminal cases. As for the Supreme Court, it has demonstrated a somewhat flexible attitude in determining the authenticity of statements by introducing concepts such as “gender sensitivity”and “no victimhood.” It is believed that this is an attempt to promote specific rationality outside the existing framework of logic and empirical rules regarding the imparting of probative value to evidence. However, excessively strict standards are applied to PDD tests, which does not grant qualifications as evidence and deprive even the opportunity to review the probative value. Such distrust and prejudice should not be used as a basis for dismissing scientific evidence lightly. Rather, evidentiary value of the PDD test results needs to be reconsidered in light of scientific principles, inspection methods and procedures, excellent inspection equipment, and research findings concerning accuracy. A re-evaluation of PDD tests as such is necessary in order to improve its use and to supplement the fact-finding process with reasonable judgments based on scientific evidence during investigations and trials.

참고문헌 (Reference)

• 1 권영법, "형사소송에서 폴리그라프 허용여부와 그 한계" 한국법학원 (128) : 202-228, 2012
• 2 최호진, "형사소송법 강의" 준커뮤니케이션즈 2020
• 3 배종대, "형사소송법" 세창출판사 2016
• 4 이창현, "형사소송법" 정독 2021
• 5 이주원, "형사소송법" 박영사 2022
• 6 정웅석, "형사소송법" 대명출판사 2011
• 7 최영승, "형사소송법" 피앤씨미디어 2015
• 8 김재환, "형사소송법" 법문사 2013
• 9 박희정, "폴리그래프 검사에서 객관적 자기인식에 따른 용의자의 생리적 반응차이" 한국사회및성격심리학회 32 (32): 33-47, 2018
• 10 김석찬 ; 장은희 ; 이상현 ; 방철 ; 김시온 ; 김현택, "폴리그래프 검사 요인에 따른 검찰 처분 및 판결 일치도 연구: 검찰청 폴리그래프 실증 연구" 한국법심리학회 6 (6): 13-31, 2015
• 11 조기영, "증거재판주의와 새로운 증명 방법의 증거능력 - 재판의 정당화 관점에서 본 영상녹화물과 조사자증언의 증거능력 -" 법학연구소 (66) : 417-448, 2015
• 12 조기영, "증거능력과 직업법관" 한국비교형사법학회 19 (19): 89-115, 2017
• 13 백형구, "알기쉬운 형사소송법" 박영사 2007
• 14 대검찰청, "심리분석의 이론과 실무 - 거짓말탐지기 검사관 양성과정 교재(상) -" 성문기업 1997
• 15 신이철, "새로운 형사소송법" 세창출판사 2019
• 16 정재영 ; 김재홍 ; 김미영 ; 강민국 ; 지형기 ; 김기호 ; 이장한, "상반된 주장에 대한 폴리그래프 검사의 판별 정확성" 한국사회및성격심리학회 24 (24): 1-10, 2010
• 17 송승은, "거짓말탐지기 검사와 그 결과의 증거능력에 관한 고찰" 법학연구원 18 (18): 534-562, 2006
• 18 최정학, "거짓말탐지기 검사결과의 증거능력 -‘과학적 증거’의 허용기준과 관련하여-" 법학연구소 44 (44): 9-33, 2009
• 19 박용철, "거짓말탐지기 검사 결과의 활용에 대한 소고" 한국형사정책학회 25 (25): 339-360, 2013
• 20 신동운, "간추린 신형사소송법" 법문사 2021
• 21 Forensic Research, Inc., "The validity and reliability of polygraph testing" 26 (26): 2017
• 22 Abrams, S., "The complete polygraph handbook" Lexington books 1989
• 23 National Research Council, "The Polygraph and lie detection" The National Academies Press 2003
• 24 Ekman, P., "Telling lies: Clues to deceit in the marketplace, politics, and marriage" WW Norton & Company 2009
• 25 Raskin, D. C., "Psychopathy and Detection of Deception In Prison Population" 15 (15): 1978
• 26 Blackstone, K., "Polygraph, sex offenders, and the court" Emerson books 2011
• 27 Peter, R., "Origin of the probable lie comparison question(Historical Anecdote)" 46 (46): 2013
• 28 Backster, C., "New standards in polygraph chart interpretation: do the charts speak themselves?" 11 (11): 1963
• 29 Kircher, J. C., "Handbook of polygraph testing" Academic Press 2002
• 30 Raskin, D. C., "Handbook of polygraph testing" Academic Press 2002
• 31 경찰청, "2021 경찰백서" 경찰청 2022