『삼국사기』제사지 고구려조의 전거자료와 기술 태도 = Sources cited in the Goguryeo chapter of the “Rituals” section of Samguk Sagi, and the Position(Attitude) of the Compiler

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

Contents of the Goguryeo chapter of the “Rituals” section of Samguk Sagi contain records that came from two major sources, Chinese historical texts and the Gogi(Ancient Records). It seems like the compiler’s intention was to use Chinese sources for references as much as possible, while avoiding documentation of rituals that were not related to Confucian philosophy. We can see that from many obvious choices of references: Description of the ‘Major Gathering to Honor the Sky’ was based upon descriptions of Huhan-seo(Later Han History). Memorial services for various deities were recorded both in Gu-Dangseo and Shin-Dangseo, yet only the latter was consulted. Services for the Dynastic Shrine and the Sajik Alter of Bi’ryu’nabu (recorded in Samguk-ji) and the Shrine of Jumong (recorded in Shin-Dangseo were not recorded in Samguk Sagi at all.
Kim Bu-shik and other compilers were very much interested in determining whether or not ancient rituals were worth mentioning in a Confucian historical text, so certain cases that were deemed worthy were inserted, and elements that were not were eventually excluded. Interestingly enough, things that did not exactly match Confucian conventions, but to which similar practices were still observed in the Goryeo period, were chosen and recorded.
Stories that came ‘from within,’ transmitted inside the Korean peninsula (supposedly) from the ancient days, were referenced to be originally from texts that had been used in compiling the Goguryeo Chronicles and the Ondal Biography. There are still discrepancies between the Goguryeo Chronicles and the “Rituals” section, but it seems like a result of a compiler mistake or its general discretion. In other words, contents of the Goguryeo chapter of the “Rituals” section do not go beyond what was written in the Goguryeo Chronicles and the Ondal Biography. This means that when the former(“Rituals”) was written, other textual sources (which were used in creating the latter) were already gone. This also informs us of the meaning of those references in Samguk Sagi.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• 머리말
• 1. 중국 측 사서의 전재 방식
• 2. 독자 전승 기사의 전재 방식
• 맺음말
• 참고문헌
• 〈Abstract〉

참고문헌 (Reference)

• 1 방향숙, "중국 正史 ‘禮樂志’와 『三國史記』 雜志 비교 분석" 한국고대사탐구학회 (12) : 153-194, 2012
• 2 金容天, "전한후기 예제담론" 선인 2007
• 3 나희라, "신라의 국가제사" 지식산업사 2003
• 4 정구복, "삼국사기 의 원전 자료와 사료비판" 한국고대사학회 (42) : 5-20, 2006
• 5 조경철, "동아시아 불교식 왕호 비교-4~8세기를 중심으로-" 한국고대사학회 (43) : 5-38, 2006
• 6 최광식, "고대한국의 국가와 제사" 한길사 1994
• 7 강경구, "고구려의 건국과 시조숭배" 학연문화사 2001
• 8 노태돈, "고구려사 연구" 사계절 1999
• 9 임기환, "고구려본기 전거 자료의 계통과 성격" 한국고대사학회 (42) : 21-78, 2006
• 10 강진원, "고구려 시조묘 제사 연구 : 친사제의 성립과 변천을 중심으로" 서울대학교 대학원 2007
• 11 임기환, "고구려 王號의 변천과 성격" 한국고대사학회 28 : 5-42, 2002
• 12 이강래, "강좌 한국고대사 1 : 한국고대사연구 100년" 가락국사적개발연구원 2003
• 13 盧明鎬, "高麗太祖王建銅像의 流轉과 문화적 배경" 50 : 2004
• 14 여호규, "高句麗의 種族 起源에 대한 일고찰 ― 夫餘別種說과 貊族說의 정합적 이해를 중심으로 ―" 수선사학회 (38) : 105-140, 2011
• 15 徐永大, "高句麗의 國家祭祀―東盟을 중심으로―" 한국사연구회 (120) : 1-32, 2003
• 16 姜辰垣, "高句麗國家祭祀硏究" 서울대학교 2015
• 17 盧明鎬, "百濟의 東明神話와 東明廟－東明神話의 再生成現狀과 관련하여－" 全南大學校史學會 10 : 1981
• 18 全海宗, "東夷傳의 文獻的硏究" 一潮閣 1980
• 19 高柄翊, "東亞交涉史의 硏究" 서울대학교 출판부 1970
• 20 小島毅, "東アヅアの儒敎と禮" 山川出版社 2004
• 21 金子修一, "東アジアにおける日本古代史講座9 : 東アジアにおける儀禮と國家" 學生社 1982
• 22 신성곤, "宗廟 制度의 탄생－宗廟의 공간과 배치를 중심으로－" 동아시아문화연구소 (57) : 41-67, 2014
• 23 井上秀雄, "古代朝鮮史序說－王者と宗敎－" 寧樂社 1978
• 24 郭善兵, "中國古代帝王宗廟禮制硏究" 人民出版社 2007
• 25 板野長八, "中國古代における人間觀の展開" 岩波書店 1972
• 26 田中俊明, "三國史記 中國史書引用記事の再檢討" 朝鮮學會 104 : 1982
• 27 鄭求福, "三國史記의 原典檢討" 韓國精神文化硏究院 1995
• 28 辛鍾遠, "三國史記祭祀志硏究－新羅祀典의 沿革･內容･意義를 중심으로－" 충남대학교 38 : 1984
• 29 申瀅植, "三國史記硏究" 一潮閣 1981
• 30 李道學, "三國史記 道琳 記事 檢討를 통해 본 百濟 蓋鹵王代 政治 狀況" 한국고대학회 (27) : 27-56, 2007
• 31 이문기, "三國史記 雜志의 構成과 典據資料의 性格" 한국고대사학회 (43) : 197-256, 2006
• 32 박수정, "『삼국사기』잡지의 편찬과 직관지의 체재" 고려사학회 (41) : 69-100, 2010
• 33 徐永大, "≪三國史記≫와 原始宗敎" 105 : 1985
• 34 蔡美夏, "≪三國史記≫ 祭祀志新羅條의 分析－新羅國家祭祀體系의 再檢討와 관련하여－" 13 : 1998
• 35 尹龍九, "3세기 이전 中國史書에 나타난 韓國古代史像" 14 : 1998