개념 충돌의 현장 개념의 충돌인가, 해석의 문제인가? -영사재판의 청심(廳審) 조항을 중심으로- = Conceptual Conflicts, or a Problem of Interpretation? -Focusing on the Cheungsim(廳審) Clause for Consular Jurisdiction-

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

This article aims to determine the meaning of the `Cheungsim` concept through real case studies involving the `Cheungsim` clause in Consular Jurisdiction in Joseon and Korean-Empire times. To do this, the article will examine the meaning according to the law of Consular Jurisdiction, the general features of the management of the Cheungsim right, and, finally, what is the point of dispute in the field in which the concept of the right to `Cheungsim` conflicts in the `Paenggang Case(彭姜案)`. Consular Jurisdiction, in civil and criminal trials between people of local and foreign countries, is a system and procedure through which an accused is judged by the judicial administration, and in accordance with the laws, of the country to which the accused belongs, while a prosecutor is protected by the administration of his or her own country; the prosecutor and witnesses attend the court of law managed by administration of the country to which the accused belongs. The `Cheungsim` clause secured by the Consular Jurisdiction in the latter years of the Korean Empire established that administrators of the countries to which the prosecutor and the accused belong gather together to discuss and negotiate before the trial, or in the course of trial. In turn, the `Cheungsim` right, given the same position with the `Seungsim(承審)` right, is highly significant, as it opened the possibility of damaging the national power of Joseon, which, in the end, was weak in terms of power relations with other countries. In the process of the `Paenggang Case`, administrators of the Korean Empire and Chung (China) revealed different ideas as regards relations between `Seungsim` and `Cheungsim`, and as to whether or not the `Seungsim` administration should have precedence. Of course, this, for the `Cheungsim` Act, which had been newly introduced in the Consular Jurisdiction, was closer to the result according to differences in the interpretation of the clause, so as to protect the people of the country, rather than a conflict of concepts with a clear meaning of social/political difference. In modern Korea, the word, `Cheungsim`, in itself, did not have any meaningful change, nor was there any content which outlined, or indicated multiple meanings, or any complexity of the concept. However, the `Cheungsim` Act, at the same time, was introduced with the intent of protecting the national rights of the Joseon order and of the Joseon people`s rights. The `Cheungsim` Act, in the late Korean Empire period, was a concept formed through experience and study of western people`s procedures in treaty-making with other countries. This was the medium connecting the national right to self-protection to that of the people`s right protection; even though this was damaged by western countries and by Japan in reality, it ws established as a lawful concept to be realized in the future. With Chung (China), as a country with which to make a treaty on equal terms, this made the conflict as it was seen a current problem, not a future problem.

참고문헌 (Reference)

• 1 정구선, "통감부기(1906~1910)일본의 치외법권 행사와 한국의 대응" 한국동학학회 (23) : 119-147, 2007
• 2 이영록, "제주도민 살해사건과 일본영사재판－ 이만송(李晩松) 살해사건을 중심으로 －" 법과사회이론학회 (26) : 147-170, 2004
• 3 "독립신문"
• 4 이영록, "근대 한국에서의 일본영사재판에 관한 연구" 한국동북아학회 11 (11): 249-272, 2006
• 5 양홍석, "개항기(1876~1910) 한 · 미 간의 치외법권 사례 분석" 한국동학학회 24 (24): 83-113, 2008
• 6 양홍석, "개항기(1876-1910) 미국의 치외법권 적용논리와 한국의 대응" 한국근현대사학회 (39) : 85-112, 2006
• 7 이영록, "개항기 한국에 있어 영사재판권－수호조약상의 근거와 내용－" 한국법사학회 (32) : 205-232, 2005
• 8 한철호, "개항기 일본의 치외법권 적용 논리와 한국의 대응" 고려사학회 (21) : 179-220, 2005
• 9 정구선, "개항 후(1876～1894) 일본의 치외법권 행사와 한국의 대응" 한국근현대사학회 (39) : 40-84, 2006
• 10 박근갑, "개념사의 지평과 전망" 도서출판 소화 2009
• 11 구범진, "韓淸通商條約 일부 條文의 해석을 둘러싼 韓-淸의 외교 분쟁" 대구사학회 83 : 193-232, 2006
• 12 이은자, "韓淸通商條約 시기(1900～1905) 중국의 在韓 치외법권 연구" 명청사학회 (26) : 89-121, 2006
• 13 權錫奉, "韓末在朝鮮淸商에 관한 硏究: 1900年初의 韓∙淸兵民紛爭案을 중심으로" 60 : 1994
• 14 李炳天, "開港과 不平等條約體制의 確立" 8 : 1984
• 15 정태섭, "開港 후(1882~1894) 淸國의 治外法權 행사와 朝鮮의 대응" 한국근현대사학회 (43) : 7-35, 2007
• 16 "淸季中日韓關係史料"
• 17 "帝國新聞"
• 18 이은자, "大韓帝國時期 韓中間 民事訴訟의 實例 ―‘彭姜案’(1898～1900)을 中心으로―" 동양사학회 (100) : 177-215, 2007
• 19 金敬泰, "丙子開港과 不平等條約關係의 構造" 11 : 1973
• 20 "『法部案』2, 3(奎17795)"
• 21 李銀子, "‘訴訟’ 안건을 통해 본 청일전쟁 이후(1895～1899) 韓中關係 연구" 중국근현대사학회 (38) : 27-62, 2008
• 22 은정태, "1899년 韓·淸通商條約 締結과 大韓帝國" 역사학회 (186) : 27-58, 2005
• 23 愼鏞厦, "1876년 開港＝開放體系의 시작과 不平等修好通商條約" 88 : 1997