한 · 중국 공원 관리체계 비교 고찰 - 서울시와 베이징시 직영관리 공원을 중심으로 - = Study on the Comparison of Park Management System in Korea·China -Oriented to Parks Directly Managed by Seoul and Beijing

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

The park management systems of two cities of Seoul and Beijing have been classified and summarized by the present condition, type, management organization, users, budget and cultural activity field to compare and analyze them.
The basic function and content of the park management system in two cities are generally same but there are many differences in concrete details such as statistics of green tracts in the park, amusement park facilities, social position statistics of users and constituents, income management system, management organization and function, method to attract users and provisions of related regulations.
The main causes of differences generated in the course of park management come from different national cultural and administrative system and both cities exert efforts in many fields to achieve their targets and enhance satisfaction of users through rearrangement of facilities, innovation of park culture, etc.
Two cities have characteristics and differences in statistics data of urban afforestation, park facility, activity of users, constituents and income/expenditures and finally, there are differences in legal provisions related to park management system of two cities comparing cultural activities, admission fee sale method and income/expenditure management system of urban parks.
The park management business commonly includes services such as park afforestation, tree and flowers, facility repair and maintenance, environmental hygiene, park service, sightseeing service, etc. so they have a great deal of workload. However, in case of Beijing city, park members have dominative understanding to achieve the object of park management by making sure to efficiently mange parks as planned.
However, I believe that we have limited data to be compared due to the different cultural and administrative system and insufficient study data, and for lack of information on environmental improvement and protection policy as well as afforestation policy in China, we should investigate the policy and actual situation at first.