특허권 공유의 성립 및 법적성질과 관련된 제문제 = Study about the factors and Legal characters of patent co-ownership

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

In a developing society, co-owner inventions and thus, co-ownership of patent rights are increasing rapidly. The provisions for the co-ownership of patents have not been modified since patent law was enacted in 1961 even though there has been various changes in the industrial environment. The Korean Intellectual Property Office however, has only individual clauses which suggest what is necessary to be a co-owner of patent rights. Therefore, we need to make general clauses to solve these problems. Furthermore, we use Joint Tenancy of U.S.A. as a term for the co-owner of patent rights. There are some problems with this, because it does not mean various characters are included in patent right co-ownership. It is therefore important for us to change this term so that co-ownership or joint ownership includes various characters. Patent right does not control physically like some material objects. It does not need to possess anything for controlling. Therefore, Patent law restrains from transferring patent rights to one co-owner without permission of the other co-owners. This also causes a problem because we need to solve at what point in time disputes occurred between co-owners, and from when relations ceased. Therefore, the patent law clauses need to be changed to solve these problems. Furthermore, an important issue that needs to be addressed is whether one of the co-owners in a patent can maintain an action for an infringement when he appeals in the Court of Appeal without the join of the other co-owners.

참고문헌 (Reference)

• 1 이인종, "특허법개론" 도서출판)현대고시사 2003
• 2 천효남, "특허법" 법경사21c 2006
• 3 윤선희, "특허법" 법문사 2007
• 4 신혜은, "특허권의 공유에 관한 비교법적고찰 및 실무상 유의점" 한국산업재산권법학회 (23) : 313-348, 2007
• 5 이상경, "지적재산권소송법" 육법사 66-, 1998
• 6 송영식, "지적소유권법" 육법사 2005
• 7 윤선희, "일부 상표권 공유자가 제기한 심결취소소송의 허부, in:정보법 판례백선(I)"
• 8 이시윤, "신민사소송법" 박영사 2007
• 9 박정화, "상표권의 공유자가 그 상표권의 효력에 관한 심판에서 패소한 경우에 제기할 심결취소송이 고유필수적 공동소송인지 여부(소극) (2004. 12. 9.선고 2002후567판결)" (53) : 2004
• 10 곽윤직, "물권법 민법강의 II" 박영사 1992
• 11 中山信弘, "공업소유권법(상)특허법" 법문사 2001
• 12 정차호, "공동연구계약의 특허 관련 규정에 관한 연구" 한국산업재산권법학회 (23) : 349-394, 2007
• 13 정차호, "공동발명자 결정방법 및 관련권리의 연구" 특허법원 3 :
• 14 정차호, "공동발명자 결정방법 및 관련 권리의 연구"
• 15 中山信弘, "註解特許法(上)" 靑林書院 2004
• 16 高林克巳, "特許訴訟-その理論と實務"
• 17 中山信弘, "特許を受けろ權利の共有者の一人による審決取消訴訟の適格性"
• 18 寺本振透, "共同發明者の 認定" 2004
• 19 Jesse Dukeminier, "Property"
• 20 Donald S. Chisum, "ELEMENTS OF UNITED STATES PATENT LAW"