푸틴 집권 2기 러시아 정당체계의 성격- 패권정당모델 적용 가능성의 검토 = Character of the Russian Party System under the Putin's Second Term - Implication of Hegemonic Party Model

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

This paper attempts to interpret the rapid growth of Russia’s Party of Power despite the
underdevelopment of the political party system. The strengthening of Russia’s Party of Power can be
interpreted as the emergence of a hegemonic party system, i.e. a non-competitive multi-party system,
rather than the institutionalization of a competitive multi-party system. In particular, little possibility of
powertransfer through free and fair election, and the marginalization of opposition parties due to internal divisions and external barriers strongly indicate the possibility of the Russian political system transiting to a hegemonic party system. However, since the consensus and concentration within the ruling elite is a necessary precondition for the hegemonic party system, and does not currently exist, the prospect for the ultimate transition to the hegemonic party system is not yet clearly visible.

국문 초록 (Abstract)

푸틴 집권 이후의 최근 러시아 정당체계는‘낮은 제도화론’만으로는 설명하기 힘든, 복합적인 양상을 보여주고 있다. 권력당의 급속한 성장과 안정화 경향, 정당체계 강화 및 정비를 목적으로 하는 일련의 형식적 제도의 도입, 그리고 선거에서의 정당요인의 강화현상 등의 현상은 특히 러시아정치체제의 전반적인 권위주의화 현상과 맞물리며 나타나고 있다.
본 논문은 권력당의 최근 발전양태 및 작동방식을 중심으로 하여 러시아 정당체계의 성격을 고찰하며 야당의 존재, 공정한 선거 및 패권적 합의라는 세 가지 변수에 근거하여 사르토리의 패권정당 유형론의 적용가능성을 검토하였다. 세 가지 변수에 대한 종합적 고찰은 패권정당제 형성의 잠재적 가능성을 보여준다. 그러나 패권정당체계의 현실화는 궁극적으로는 주요 행위자의 패권적 합의의 형성에 달려있다고 보인다.

참고문헌 (Reference)

• 1 "체제전환기 러시아 지방정치의 제도화 과정과 엘리트 분화" 38 (38): 339-364, 2004
• 2 "Why Not Parties? Electoral Markets, Party Substitutes and Stalled Democratization in Russia" 147-166, 2005
• 3 Elklit, Jørgen, "What Makes Elections Free and Fair?" Baltimore and London: The Johns Hopkins University Press. 2001
• 4 "The Party of Power in Russian Politics" 2 : 123-145, 2000
• 5 "The 2003-2004 Russian Elections and Prospects for Democracy" 57 (57): 369-398, 2005
• 6 "Serving Different Masters: Regional Executives and Accountability in Ukraine and Russia." 57 (57): 3-33, 2005
• 7 Colton, Timothy J, "Reinventing Russia’s Party of Power:“ Unity”and the 1999 Duma Election." 16 (16): 201-224, 2000
• 8 "Putin’s Etatization Project and Limits to Democratic Reforms in Russia" 38 : 25-48, 2005
• 9 "Putins Russland- Ein vertrauensw？rdiger Partner? Grundlagen,Hintergr？nde und Praxis gegenw？rtiger russischer Au？enpolitik" Stuttgart 2004
• 10 "Pitun’s Russia: One Step Forward, Two Steps Back" Baltimore and London: The Johns Hopkins University Press. 333-347, 2001
• 11 "Party Systems in the Third Wave" Baltimore and London: The Johns Hopkins University Press 185-199, 2001
• 12 "OSCE/ODIHR Election Observation Mission" 2003
• 13 "Inside the Putin Court: A Research Note" 57 (57): 1065-1075, 2005
• 14 "Illusions about Consolidation" Baltimore and London: The Johns Hopkins University Press 113-130, 2001
• 15 "Evolution of Party System in Russia: Major Trends and Recent Developments" 38 (38): 95-115, 2004
• 16 "Einiges Russland:‘ Die Partei der Macht”als Staatspartei?" 115 : 2-5, 2006
• 17 "Die Silowiki in der russischen Politik: Politische Strategie oder Produkt desSystems?" 117 : 2006
• 18 "Die Novellierung von Partei- und Wahlgesetz in ihren Folgen für das russischen Parteiensystem" 53 : 2005
• 19 "A Framework for Analysis" Cambridge University Press 1976
• 20 ". Building State Capacity from the Inside Out: Parties of Power and the Success of the President’s Reform Agenda in Russia" 30 (30): 555-578, 2002
• 21 "Über die Zukunft liberaler Politik in Russland" 06 : 2006