Patient-Reported Outcomes after Subpectoral Breast Augmentation with Microtextured or Macrotextured Implants Using the BREAST-Q

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

Background Breast augmentation with implants is the most commonly performed cosmetic plastic surgery in Brazil and worldwide. The aim of this study was to assess patient satisfaction and quality of life following subpectoral breast augmentation with either microtextured or macrotextured implants, using the BREAST-Q.
Methods A prospective study was conducted with 40 women with hypomastia undergoing subpectoral breast augmentation. The patients were randomly allocated to two groups to receive either microtextured or macrotextured breast implants. All participants were assessed preoperatively (baseline) and after 2 and 4 months of surgery for quality of life and patient satisfaction with the surgical results, using the BREAST-Q augmentation module, a patient-reported outcome measure.
Results The patients had amean age of 28.96.45 years. Themicrotextured (n¼20) and macrotextured (n¼20) groups were homogeneous for sex, age, education level, marital status, and number of children (p>0.05). Both groups showed significant improvement in satisfaction with breasts (p<0.001), psychosocial well-being (p<0.001), and sexual well-being (p<0.001) at the 2- and 4-month follow-up visits compared with baseline. The observed improvements were associated with high effect size values of 5.09, 3.44, and 3.90, respectively. In contrast, significant decreases from baseline in physical well-being scores (p¼0.001) were found 2 and 4 weeks after surgery in both groups.
Conclusion Subpectoral breast augmentation with either microtextured or macrotextured breast implants improved satisfaction with breasts and quality of life in patients with hypomastia.

참고문헌 (Reference)

• 1 Alderman AK, "Understanding the effect of breast augmentation on quality of life : prospective analysis using the BREAST-Q" 133 (133): 787-795, 2014
• 2 Gryskiewicz J, "Transaxillary nonendoscopic subpectoral augmentation mammaplasty : a 10-year experience with gel vs saline in 2000 patients with long-term patient satisfaction measured by the BREAST-Q" 34 (34): 696-713, 2014
• 3 Bracaglia R, "The tripleplane BRA-flap and inverted BRA-flap modified dual-plane techniques for breast augmentation" 40 (40): NP141-NP151, 2020
• 4 McCarthy CM, "The magnitude of effect of cosmetic breast augmentation on patient satisfaction and healthrelated quality of life" 130 (130): 218-223, 2012
• 5 Neto MS, "The impact of surgical treatment on the self-esteem of patients with breast hypertrophy, hypomastia, or breast asymmetry" 36 (36): 223-225, 2012
• 6 CohenWA, "The BREAST-Q in surgical research : a review of the literature 2009-2015" 69 (69): 149-162, 2016
• 7 Derby BM, "Textured silicone breast implant use in primary augmentation : core data update and review" 135 (135): 113-124, 2015
• 8 Cohen J, "Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences" Erlbaum 1988
• 9 Diaz JF, "Review of 494 consecutive breast augmentation patients : system to improve patient outcomes and satisfaction" 5 (5): e1526-, 2017
• 10 Sacchini V, "Quantitative and qualitative cosmetic evaluation after conservative treatment for breast cancer" 27 (27): 1395-1400, 1991
• 11 Abla LEF, "Quality of life and selfesteem outcomes following augmentation mammaplasty" 20 : 22-26, 2010
• 12 Kalaaji A, "Quality of life after breast enlargement with implants versus augmentation mastopexy : a comparative study" 38 (38): 1304-1315, 2018
• 13 Alderman A, "Prospective analysis of primary breast augmentation on body image using the BREAST-Q : results from a nationwide study" 137 (137): 954e-960e, 2016
• 14 Deschler A, "Primary breast augmentation with autologous fat grafting alone : evaluation of patient satisfaction using the BREAST-Q" 40 (40): 1196-1204, 2020
• 15 Xu H, "New design for axillary dualplane endoscopic breast augmentation for Asians : the feasibility of two types of dual-plane implant pockets in 70 patients as measured by the BREAST-Q" 40 (40): 79-88, 2016
• 16 Pusic AL, "Measuring patient outcomes in breast augmentation : introducing the BREAST-Q augmentation module" 36 (36): 23-32, 2009
• 17 International Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery (ISAPS), "ISAPS International Survey on Aesthetic/Cosmetic Procedures performed in 2019" ISAPS
• 18 Tebbetts JB, "Five critical decisions in breast augmentation using five measurements in 5minutes: the high five decision support process" 118 (118): 35S-45S, 2006
• 19 Pusic AL, "Development of a new patient-reported outcome measure for breast surgery : the BREAST-Q" 124 (124): 345-353, 2009
• 20 Brault N, "Correction of tuberous breast deformity : a retrospective study comparing lipofilling versus breast implant augmentation" 70 (70): 585-595, 2017
• 21 Sociedade Brasileira de Cirurgia Plástica (SBCP), "Censo 2018:Análise comparativa das pesquisas 2014, 2016 e 2018 [2018Census: Comparative analysis of surveys 2014, 2016 and 2018]" SBPC
• 22 Sbalchiero JC, "Breast-Q questionnaire, translation process to Portuguese language and their application on breast cancer patients" 28 : 549-552, 2013
• 23 Charles Randquist ; Yong Chen Por ; Vincent Yeow ; Joy Maglambayan ; Susan Simonyi, "Breast augmentation surgery using an inframammary fold incision in Southeast Asian women: Patient-reported outcomes" 대한성형외과학회 45 (45): 367-374, 2018
• 24 Maxwell GP, "Benefits and limitation of macrotextured breast implants and consensus recommendations for optimizing their effectiveness" 34 (34): 876-881, 2014
• 25 Coriddi M, "Analysis of satisfaction and well-being in the short follow-up from breast augmentation using the BREAST-Q, a validated survey instrument" 33 (33): 245-251, 2013
• 26 Overschmidt B, "A prospective evaluation of three-dimensional image simulation : patient-reported outcomes and mammometrics in primary breast augmentation" 142 (142): 133e-144e, 2018
• 27 Cano SJ, "A closer look at the BREAST-Q(©)" 40 (40): 287-296, 2013