KCI등재후보
『東人詩話』로 살펴본 徐居正의 格律論的 漢詩批評 = Seo Geo Jung’s Gyeokyulron-tic Critic on Chinese poems seen through [Dongin-siwha]
저자
윤인현 (인하대학교)
발행기관
학술지명
권호사항
발행연도
2008
작성언어
Korean
주제어
등재정보
KCI등재후보
자료형태
학술저널
수록면
311-348(38쪽)
KCI 피인용횟수
5
제공처
소장기관
This paper aims to conduct an overall review of the Gyeokyul-tic critic of Saga Seo Geo Jung shown in [Dongin-siwha]. Gyoekyul theory is a concept of writing that emphasizes the meaning and organization of sentences and is a combination of gisang(spirit), yeuigyeok(meaning), sa-eo(word), sungryul, etc. It is an integrated concept of meaning and description(called yeui-gyung).
In a poem, gyeok refers to the character of a poem that is formed with an atmosphere and has achieved yeui-gyung. In China, Koryeo, or Chusn period, the moon-giron was more valued than gi-cheon ron. Likewise, in the period of Seo Geo Jung, the atmosphere was more valued than the meaning.
Seo Geo Jung, in his work of Dongin-siwha, mentioned that a poetry work’s quality becomes better or worse according to the level of gisang(spirit). As the people’s character was initially set by the heaven but is also altered later in life, he argued that according to the environment and one’s effort, the character could be changed at later time. Both for a single word and for a long writing, they all essentially exist to represent a meaning.
In the poetic words, he also said that the authors must be able to state and express their meanings clearly, and he must argue that they must pay much care in writing as if they are carving each word in their poem.
His poetry theory about Sungryul was considered to be hard by many poem writers and readers in Korea, and few data are left available. The critical standard set on Sungryul by Seo Geo Jung in his Dongin-siwhat includes yoche and joongab(writing once more with the same word to create sharp rhythm). In Dongin-siwha, there are many critics regarding the usage of yong-sa and jum-wha. In the method of yong-sa, there was the direct method of usage(jik-yong method) which directly uses the go-sa(old words), and there is a bun-ahn method which quotes the words by completely reversing their meaning. He introduced the whal-gol method as a method of jum-wha, and in case of jum-wha that is wrongly conducted, he called it do-seub and cautioned the readers not to make such mistakes.
Seo Geo Jung had many cases in which he used the theory of Gyeokyul in setting critical standards on poems mentioned in Dongin-siwha. Especially, he valued gi-sang very much and he liked those poems that had a very high gi-sang. Also, he especially recommended the clear yong-sa technique of quoting old words referring to the old events in the past and showing a new meaning, and he praised those poems having great jum-wha as a pupil excelling his master. However, in case the poems had very bad jumwha, he harshly criticized them as an oak-ha-ka-ok(an image of a house inside a house).
This paper aims to conduct an overall review of the Gyeokyul-tic critic of Saga Seo Geo Jung shown in [Dongin-siwha]. Gyoekyul theory is a concept of writing that emphasizes the meaning and organization of sentences and is a combination of gisang(spirit), yeuigyeok(meaning), sa-eo(word), sungryul, etc. It is an integrated concept of meaning and description(called yeui-gyung).
In a poem, gyeok refers to the character of a poem that is formed with an atmosphere and has achieved yeui-gyung. In China, Koryeo, or Chusn period, the moon-giron was more valued than gi-cheon ron. Likewise, in the period of Seo Geo Jung, the atmosphere was more valued than the meaning.
Seo Geo Jung, in his work of Dongin-siwha, mentioned that a poetry work’s quality becomes better or worse according to the level of gisang(spirit). As the people’s character was initially set by the heaven but is also altered later in life, he argued that according to the environment and one’s effort, the character could be changed at later time. Both for a single word and for a long writing, they all essentially exist to represent a meaning.
In the poetic words, he also said that the authors must be able to state and express their meanings clearly, and he must argue that they must pay much care in writing as if they are carving each word in their poem.
His poetry theory about Sungryul was considered to be hard by many poem writers and readers in Korea, and few data are left available. The critical standard set on Sungryul by Seo Geo Jung in his Dongin-siwhat includes yoche and joongab(writing once more with the same word to create sharp rhythm). In Dongin-siwha, there are many critics regarding the usage of yong-sa and jum-wha. In the method of yong-sa, there was the direct method of usage(jik-yong method) which directly uses the go-sa(old words), and there is a bun-ahn method which quotes the words by completely reversing their meaning. He introduced the whal-gol method as a method of jum-wha, and in case of jum-wha that is wrongly conducted, he called it do-seub and cautioned the readers not to make such mistakes.
Seo Geo Jung had many cases in which he used the theory of Gyeokyul in setting critical standards on poems mentioned in Dongin-siwha. Especially, he valued gi-sang very much and he liked those poems that had a very high gi-sang. Also, he especially recommended the clear yong-sa technique of quoting old words referring to the old events in the past and showing a new meaning, and he praised those poems having great jum-wha as a pupil excelling his master. However, in case the poems had very bad jumwha, he harshly criticized them as an oak-ha-ka-ok(an image of a house inside a house).
분석정보
연월일 | 이력구분 | 이력상세 | 등재구분 |
---|---|---|---|
2023 | 평가예정 | 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증) | |
2020-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 선정 (재인증) | KCI등재 |
2019-12-01 | 평가 | 등재후보로 하락 (계속평가) | KCI후보 |
2016-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) | KCI등재 |
2012-01-01 | 평가 | 등재 1차 FAIL (등재유지) | KCI등재 |
2009-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) | KCI등재 |
2008-01-01 | 평가 | 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) | KCI후보 |
2007-01-01 | 평가 | 등재후보 1차 FAIL (등재후보1차) | KCI후보 |
2005-01-01 | 평가 | 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) | KCI후보 |
기준연도 | WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) | KCIF(2년) | KCIF(3년) |
---|---|---|---|
2016 | 0.55 | 0.55 | 0.49 |
KCIF(4년) | KCIF(5년) | 중심성지수(3년) | 즉시성지수 |
0.48 | 0.47 | 0.972 | 0.08 |
서지정보 내보내기(Export)
닫기소장기관 정보
닫기권호소장정보
닫기오류접수
닫기오류 접수 확인
닫기음성서비스 신청
닫기음성서비스 신청 확인
닫기이용약관
닫기학술연구정보서비스 이용약관 (2017년 1월 1일 ~ 현재 적용)
학술연구정보서비스(이하 RISS)는 정보주체의 자유와 권리 보호를 위해 「개인정보 보호법」 및 관계 법령이 정한 바를 준수하여, 적법하게 개인정보를 처리하고 안전하게 관리하고 있습니다. 이에 「개인정보 보호법」 제30조에 따라 정보주체에게 개인정보 처리에 관한 절차 및 기준을 안내하고, 이와 관련한 고충을 신속하고 원활하게 처리할 수 있도록 하기 위하여 다음과 같이 개인정보 처리방침을 수립·공개합니다.
주요 개인정보 처리 표시(라벨링)
목 차
3년
또는 회원탈퇴시까지5년
(「전자상거래 등에서의 소비자보호에 관한3년
(「전자상거래 등에서의 소비자보호에 관한2년
이상(개인정보보호위원회 : 개인정보의 안전성 확보조치 기준)개인정보파일의 명칭 | 운영근거 / 처리목적 | 개인정보파일에 기록되는 개인정보의 항목 | 보유기간 | |
---|---|---|---|---|
학술연구정보서비스 이용자 가입정보 파일 | 한국교육학술정보원법 | 필수 | ID, 비밀번호, 성명, 생년월일, 신분(직업구분), 이메일, 소속분야, 웹진메일 수신동의 여부 | 3년 또는 탈퇴시 |
선택 | 소속기관명, 소속도서관명, 학과/부서명, 학번/직원번호, 휴대전화, 주소 |
구분 | 담당자 | 연락처 |
---|---|---|
KERIS 개인정보 보호책임자 | 정보보호본부 김태우 | - 이메일 : lsy@keris.or.kr - 전화번호 : 053-714-0439 - 팩스번호 : 053-714-0195 |
KERIS 개인정보 보호담당자 | 개인정보보호부 이상엽 | |
RISS 개인정보 보호책임자 | 대학학술본부 장금연 | - 이메일 : giltizen@keris.or.kr - 전화번호 : 053-714-0149 - 팩스번호 : 053-714-0194 |
RISS 개인정보 보호담당자 | 학술진흥부 길원진 |
자동로그아웃 안내
닫기인증오류 안내
닫기귀하께서는 휴면계정 전환 후 1년동안 회원정보 수집 및 이용에 대한
재동의를 하지 않으신 관계로 개인정보가 삭제되었습니다.
(참조 : RISS 이용약관 및 개인정보처리방침)
신규회원으로 가입하여 이용 부탁 드리며, 추가 문의는 고객센터로 연락 바랍니다.
- 기존 아이디 재사용 불가
휴면계정 안내
RISS는 [표준개인정보 보호지침]에 따라 2년을 주기로 개인정보 수집·이용에 관하여 (재)동의를 받고 있으며, (재)동의를 하지 않을 경우, 휴면계정으로 전환됩니다.
(※ 휴면계정은 원문이용 및 복사/대출 서비스를 이용할 수 없습니다.)
휴면계정으로 전환된 후 1년간 회원정보 수집·이용에 대한 재동의를 하지 않을 경우, RISS에서 자동탈퇴 및 개인정보가 삭제처리 됩니다.
고객센터 1599-3122
ARS번호+1번(회원가입 및 정보수정)