한반도의 특수성을 고려한 한국의 군사전략 발전방안 = The study of Development for Korean military strategy considering the specialities of Korean peninsula

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

Considering the changes of Security environment such as the change of re cent war trend, modern warfare and ROK-Military Reform etc, these days a re debating for the developing of ROK-Milirarys strategy. The core of Requ irements according to following like these ; Firstly, Korea must establishes on the military strategy with playing a leading role, considering the changes of recent war tendency and ROK-Military Reform(reducing the scale of milit ary, reforming a technique forces), and the wartime OPCON Transition. Secondly, The new strategy must be made considering that a deceive war has purposes and objectives, How long the executing period is. where a dec eive war takes place, What is the way(means and ways=Art of war), What are the available assets for the deceive war. And according to the Art of war on the base of these military strategy must be developed and ROK Military m ust be trained. But Investigating the our statues, there are a lot of problems on linking with Military strategic concepts - Doctrines - Construction of Mil itary power - Education & Training. The ways of New ROK-Military Strategy insisting on this study have to i nclude the components( those are Purposes and Objectives, Means and Ways (Art of war), operating Military assets) of planning Military Strategy reflecting the Korean peninsula special environment and the changes of recent war tre nd. and I described as ; Firstly, Establishing new strategic purpose and obje ctive are similar the former one. the different focus is that this study is addi ng Defence of the border with other nations on the former concepts, such as the Occupation on north Korean area & Reunification and removing the nort h korean government. Campaign on the concepts of this study will be separa ted with several one, not one campaign. and Each campaign must define each purpose & objectives. Secondly, On the level of Art of war, When we consider the tendency of recent war, modern warfare, Available military assets, Reform of ROK-Milit ary, Environment of time and space, etc, this study insists that the campaign of Korean peninsula have to change several campaigns, improving that now Korean peninsula be defined as one campaign and separated with Main opera tions in the one. there are some reasons that After turning over the wartime OPCON, Korean military must carry out some decisive operations as a statu s of main operator with the wartime OPCON on the war, so have to fight wit h substantial available military assets. and the Art of war must be made con sidering those. For that reason, this study suggested that It is desirable that the campaign for Defense when north korea attack to the south korea have to be divided over 2 campaigns, and the campaign for seizing north-korea ar ea and reunification when we counter attack to the north-korea. have to be divided over 3 campaigns. On the focus of Military assets, The way of head for building new Military strategy have to meet next two demands ; First, Military assets have to be constructed on the bases of the Art of War of each campaigns. Because Art of war is quite different with Time and Space, and at this time Military asset s to be operated are different. Thus, The military assets operated at Now co ntacting area with enemy(the area of DMZ and FEBA), Deep area of north k orea, and The border with other nations have to be fixed and constructed ac cording to each Art of war concepts. Second, Our neighboring countries are Strong nations that can be heading for world hegemony. Our nation which is small nation can not build all of the military power requested for winning aga inst Our neighboring countries. Thus, we have to fix the appropriate constru ctive goal of the military power. and Those are linked with nation policy, nat ion strategy, military strategy. For overcoming the shortage of military asset s, those have to be reflected on the building plans of military power conside ring those possibility, and those can be arranged at the level of national stra tegy. At this time, we have to develop the plan that the shortage of military power make up with ally-nation``s military powers.

참고문헌 (Reference)

• 1 국방부, "한국적 군사혁신의 비전과 방책" 국방부 2002
• 2 국가안전보장회의, "한국국가안전보장논총" 국가안전보장회의 23 : 1997
• 3 이규열, "중장기 위협평가 및 국가안보전력" 한국국방연구원 2000
• 4 노 훈, "정보･지식시대의 국방기획 및 육군전력시스템 구상" 한국전략문제연구소 2001
• 5 국방정보본부, "점혈전쟁" 국방정보본부 2002
• 6 김석용, "전환기의 국내안보" 국방대학교 안보문제연구소 2001
• 7 국방과학연구소, "일본의 군사과학기술 발전추세" 국방과학연구소 1998
• 8 합동참모본부, "아프간 전쟁 종합분석" 합동참모본부 2002
• 9 김동성, "신국가안보전략의 모색" 한국전략문제연구소 1993
• 10 박경일 편저, "동북아 안보의 도화선은 어디에 있는가?" 한국해양전략연구소 2003
• 11 서정해, "군사력의 비대칭성에 대한 소고" (771) : 1999
• 12 국방부, "국방백서 2000" 국방부 2000
• 13 국방부, "국방백서 1997~1998" 국방부 1997
• 14 국방부, "국방백서 1992~1993" 국방부 1992
• 15 국방부, "국방기획관리 기본규정" 국방부 2002
• 16 Luttwak, Edward N, "The Logic of War and Peace" Harvard University Press 1987
• 17 Gorge, Alexander, "The Limits of Coercive Diplomacy" Little. Brown and Company 1971
• 18 Fedyszyn, Thomas R., "Resource Allocation : The Formal Process" Naval War College 2002
• 19 "Rand Report, Chinese Military Modernization and Its Implication for the United States Air Force" 1999
• 20 Gray, Colin S., "Modern Strategy" Oxford University Press 1999
• 21 Colin S. Gray, "Modern Strategy" Oxford University Press 1999
• 22 Collins, John M, "Military Strategy : Principles, Practices, and Histori -cal Perspectives" Brassey's INC 2002
• 23 U.S. Joint Chiefs of Staff, "Joint Doctrine Encyclopedia"
• 24 Scales, Jr., "Future Warfare Anthology" U. S. Army War College 1999
• 25 U.S. Defense Department, "Annual Report on the Military Power of the People's Republic of China"
• 26 Warden, John A., "Air Theory for Twenty-first Century"
• 27 Pollack, Jonathan, "A New Alliance for the Next Century" RAND 1995
• 28 박창권, "21세기통일대비 육군전투 발전의 과업과 추진전략" 2002
• 29 세종연구소, "21세기 한국의 국가전략" 세종연구소 2000
• 30 한국개발연구원, "2011 비전과 과제" 한국개발연구원 2002
• 31 국방부, "2010 국방백서" 국방부 2010
• 32 국방정보본부, "2002년 일본 방위백서" 국방정보본부 2002
• 33 통일부, "2002 통일백서" 통일부 2002
• 34 국방부, "1998~2002 국방정책" 국방부 2002