住宅政策의 改善方向에 관한 硏究 = A Study On The Improving Directions Of the Housing Policy

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

This study will compare our country's housing policy with that of foreign countries by referring to documentary records and analyzing related systems and preceding statistical data.
Through the housing problem which was found by analyzing the present housing system, this finding suggested the directional housing policy and important problems which the government confronts.
The following points sum up the present housing problem:
First, An increase in Quantity. Even though our government provides a good quantity of housing, according to the house-providing policy, The housing problem is still serious, especially in a metropolis.
Second, Quality Level and Imbalance of Housing. Because of increasing income, the general housing service level has increased. However, the gap between people of every walk of life is deepening, and the supply of housing doesn't satisfy the demand.
Third, Lack of Stability, Inequality of Housing. There are low and high housing expenses in every income level. The housing shortage poses a big social problem. The cost of housing has gone up more rapidly than consumer prices, the people are given much weight in society to rent.
Fourth, Deepening in the Lack of Stability and Inequality in Housing. The house shortage exists in highly developed cities. This is unbecoming to a society. It seriously threatens the right of residence(a basic human right) which is prescribed in the UN. The Korean people achieved local autonomy after a long fight and faced internationalization and the policy of free trading.
Therefore, the direction of housing policy should be like this:
First, The housing market must be liberalized. That is the way to improve democracy, efficiency and equality.
Second, A rental house policy should be developed and supported. It is necessary to develop rental houses and empower that culture to take root. The government should support not only individual ownership, but also the rental of dwellings.
Third, The roles between the central government and local government should be redistributed and tuned. The central government should strengthen motivation, cooperation, guidance, control, technology and financial support for the local government to establish and to execute a locally-supported housing policy. Also, the central government should prepare a concrete plan to expand local finances for asolid local autonomy.
Fourth, Strengthen a certain device for the protection of the consumer. The function that provides protection for the consumer should strengthen. For example, readjusting the housing management system, such as quality guranteed, maintenance of housing, the proper housing supplies of demand.
Fifth, housing policy as an aspect of social welfare should stand firmly. The right of residence should work well for the poor and for the distribution of wealth and social security. We should try to avoid clearing slums for the purpose of development without considering a counterplan to relocate residents of the slum.
Sixth, the government must set up a policy to prepare an open market of housing. Also, it must try to find a solution against foreign capital and technology. A certain program which improves competitive power must show up.
Finally, we must prepare the housing policy in case of the future reunification of Korea. Political research and investigation which minimizes the expected problem should precede the reunification of Korea.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• 1.硏究의 背景 및 目的
• 2.住居實態와 政策의 變化過程
• 1)住居實態
• 2)住宅政策의 變化課程
• 3)外國의 住宅政策
• 3.住宅政策 및 關聯制度의 問題點
• 1)住宅政策의 問題點
• 2)住宅關聯制度의 問題點
• 3)地方自治와 住宅政策
• 4.住宅需要의 展望
• 1)住宅需要
• 2)住宅選好
• 5.住宅政策의 改善方向
• 1)役割分擔 및 民間建設業의 育成
• 2)住宅市場의 自律化
• 3)賃貸住宅의 育成
• 4)消費자 保護의 强化
• 6.結論 및 今後의 課題