入傳 인물을 통해 본 「東賢事略」의 성격 = Characteristics of 「Donghyeon Saryak(東賢事略)」 in View of the People Included in 「Donghyeon Saryak(東賢事略)」

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

As above, it examined that Kwon Geun tried to enhance the status of his family through his book, 「Donghyeon Saryak」, which selected the characters connected with the relations of his families, relatives and Jwajumunseng as sages [Donghyeon] of our country. It is going to summarize this writing to replace the closing remarks.
The composition of the contents of 「Donghyeon Saryak」 that includes the lives and whereabouts of 24 persons is made of the basic structure that introduces the basic information (Ja, Ho, Family Clan, Family Line), whereabouts (Gwageo Geupje, Gwageo supervision, other activities) and official histories, and it evaluates nature or additionally describe writing activities. While 「Donghyeon Saryak」 is an abbreviated type compared to 『Goryeosa』 biography or memorial inscription, the composition of the contents are not quite different.
What is noticeable is some aspects that are difficult to be considered Donghyeon in other records are confirmed. As for examples of unfair description, first Kwon Geun omitted the contents or Buddhism related aspects that are disadvantageous to evaluate the characters as Donghyeon. Kwon Geun intentionally omitted the fact that impeachment for the characters in 「Donghyeon Saryak」 was not excellent, or not upright man of power was found such as giving some favor to requests after receiving a bribe. Second, different from the negative evaluation by other recorders for the selection as Donghyeon and its description by Kwon Geun, 「Donghyeon Saryak」 gives positive evaluation that is contrary to each other.
Like this, the contents of 「Donghyeon Saryak」 is lack of objectivity. However, in the results of preceding studies, 「Donghyeon Saryak」 is considered to be part of the order of year 1935 (Taejo 3), and furthermore, this is regarded as the supplement of the sufficient contents in the descriptions related to the characters of 『Goryeoguksa』. Since 「Donghyeon Saryak」 recorded in 『Yangchonjip』 has not a preface or epilogue but the contents of 24 characters, it is not easy to clarify when and why Kwon Geun wrote it. However, the consideration of the preceding studies that the publication of 「Donghyeon Saryak」 is related to the order of Taejo Year 3 should be rethought. It is needed to review what ‘the secret memoir of many sages of our country’ was.
First of all, in the point that the term of ‘history’ means ‘being hand down for generations, the secret memoir can be considered to be a secret record that had been handed down for generations rather than a biography of a specific period like 「Donghyeon Saryak」. Moreover, when it is considered that this is related to the situation in the process of transfer of the capital, it is the summary of a geographic secret memoir rather than a summary of a ‘secret memoir’ of a character. In addition, in case of a common writing made by king‘s command, mostly it discloses the fact of king’s command, but there is no comment in the book about king‘s command. Accordingly, it may be some unreasonable to consider it to be a publication by the order of Taejo Year 3. Furthermore, when it comes to the purpose of the book to contribute to the king by king‘s command, as the description of 「Donghyeon Saryak」 by Kwon Geun includes many characters connected to the families of Kwon Geun, it can not ignore the unfair description. Therefore, it should be considered that 「Donghyeon Saryak」 was not made by king‘s order but a separate work from the summary of the secret memoir of the past sages of our country. Even though it is not easy to compare and decide the accurate preparatory period due to no preface or epilogue, the preparatory period can be guessed as the Goryeo Dynasty through the birth and death dates of the characters in 「Donghyeon Saryak」.
「Donghyeon Saryak」 contains characters connecting Kwon Geun and his families. In particular, as the Jwajumunseng relation beco...

참고문헌 (Reference)

• 1 류주희, "조선초 遷都논의와 정국 동향" 21 : 2005
• 2 "안동권씨 대종회"
• 3 강문식, "권근의 경학사상 연구" 일지사 2008
• 4 허흥식, "고려의 과거제도" 일조각 2005
• 5 김남일, "고려말 조선초기의 세계관과 역사의식" 경인문화사 2005
• 6 장지연, "麗末鮮初遷都論議에 대하여" 23 : 2000
• 7 "高麗史節要"
• 8 "高麗史"
• 9 "陽村集"
• 10 "補閑集"
• 11 "牧隱集"
• 12 "櫟翁稗說"
• 13 박한남, "崔瀣의 『東人之文五七』편찬과 사료적 가치" 한국사학회 (67) : 57-101, 2002
• 14 "太祖實錄"
• 15 "世宗實錄"
• 16 채웅석, "『목은시고(牧隱詩藁)』를 통해서 본 이색의 인간관계망 － 우왕 3년(1377) ~ 우왕 9년(1383)을 중심으로 －" 한국역사연구회 (62) : 75-110, 2006
• 17 許成準, "『東賢事略』에 나타난 權近의 歷史와 社會 認識 : 傳作品을 中心으로" 東國大學校 敎育大學院 1998
• 18 박종기, "「동현사략(東賢事略)」의 자료 가치와 특성" 한국역사연구회 (84) : 95-127, 2012