신라 흥덕왕대 손순에 대한 포상과 그 의미 = The Reward for Sonsun in <Sonsun-Maea> and its Meaning

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

This study attempted a more detailed analysis of Sonsun-Maea, who was mainly analyzed in history of thought and history, noting the differences from other stories in the Hyosun issue of “The History of the Three Kingdoms.” It was intended to reveal King Heungdeok's intention by analyzing the meaning of Moryangri and Segeub (歲給).
More than 100 years ago from the reign of King Heungdeok, Moryangri was punished for the corruption of Ikseon (益宣) Agan (阿干) of the enzyme kingdom. As people in Moryangri, the measure prohibits them from entering government offices and leaving the country. The advancement and exit of government offices are the exclusive property of influential people. However, if these activities were banned as Moryangri people, the local influential people who were able to enter and leave government offices would have tried to use their power in other ways. It was believed that this burden may have been passed on to the ordinary people of Moryangri. Therefore, King Heungdeok gave Sonsun a gift rather than a one-time reward, which is more helpful to his livelihood than a large-scale commendation for filial piety. Given that the names of the places where the stone bell came from were misrepresented or that Honghyo Temple was looted, it does not appear to have been strongly managed since then. King Heungdeok apparently tried to show through Sonsun's example that realizing the value of filial piety to the Moryangri people can actually get out of the difficulty of living.
In addition, two things can be inferred from the unknown commercialization of when the punishment for Moryangri was collected. One is when punishment was collected before King Heungdeok or after King Heungdeok. However, I would like to think of it as the latter because it is not clear whether the punishment for Moryangri has been collected. If the punishment has not been collected for more than 100 years, it may have been embedded in people's perception that the punishment for the people of Moryangri was perceived as punishment for the area called Moryangri. Unlike the cases of Hyangdeok and Jieun, a kind of taboo about Moryangri was regarded as a reason for the lack of geographical names that showed Sonsun's filial behavior.

참고문헌 (Reference)

• 1 김기섭, "한국중세사회의 제문제" 2001
• 2 이홍직, "한국고대사의 연구" 신구문화사 1971
• 3 이기백, "신라정치사회사연구" 일조각 1974
• 4 김재경, "신라의 밀교 수용과 그 성격" 대구사학회 14 : 1978
• 5 김두진, "신라 의상계 화엄종의 ‘효선쌍미’ 신앙" 국민대학교 한국학연구소 15 : 1992
• 6 "신당서"
• 7 고소진, "손순매아조와 빈녀양모조를 통해 본 신라 하대 孝" 대구사학회 115 : 37-70, 2014
• 8 김영하, "삼국유사 효선편의 이해" 동국대학교 신라문화연구소 30 : 2009
• 9 강진옥, "삼국유사 효선편 설화연구 1: 손순매아의 의미" 국어국문학회 93 : 1985
• 10 김상현, "삼국유사 효선편 검토" 단국대학교 동양학연구원 30 : 2000
• 11 "삼국유사"
• 12 "삼국사기"
• 13 이병도, "국역 삼국사기" 을유문화사 1966
• 14 "고려사"
• 15 강진철, "개정 고려토지제도사연구" 일조각 1997
• 16 김태식, "『삼국유사』 죽지랑조 탈구축을 통한 신라 화랑과 그 화주" 충북대학교 사학회 21 : 2008
• 17 김수태, "『삼국유사』 ‘향득사지’조로 본 신라인의 효행" 동국대학교 신라문화연구소 30 : 2009