경찰기관 정보공개 처분의 실태와 시사점 - 중앙행정심판위원회의 재결 분석을 중심으로 - = Current Status and Dispositions of Official Information Disclosure by Police Agencies - Focusing on the analysis of the ruling of the Administrative Appeals Commission -

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

The purpose of this study is to guarantee the citizen's right to request information disclosure by illuminating the actual situation of illegal or unreasonable disclosure of information by police agencies that perform the duties of maintaining public peace and order. This study examines the information disclosure procedures of public institutions and administrative judgment, which is a means of dissatisfaction with police dispositions, and examines the actual status of illegal or unjust information disclosure dispositions by police agencies through the analysis of 22 rulings of the Administrative Appeals Commission. Policy suggestions were made after reviewing the implications.
When a citizen who is guaranteed the right to know requests information disclosure to the police agency, the police agency and the person in charge of information disclosure must comply with the information disclosure procedures and methods in accordance with the law and decide whether or not to disclose information. If a person requesting information disclosure is dissatisfied with the disposition of information disclosure by the police agency, he/she may request an administrative adjudication to the Administrative Appeals Commission. The Administrative Appeals Commission, which received the request for administrative adjudication, reviews and decides on the illegality or injustice of the information disclosure disposition of the police agency.
In 2021, the Central Administrative Appeals Commission ruled citing or partially citing 22 cases regarding illegal or unreasonable police agency information disclosure dispositions. The implications derived from this analysis are as follows. First, there is a misunderstanding in the application of legal principles of information disclosure laws as some police agencies are refusing to disclose information by ‘without revealing specific reasons for non-disclosure’ or ‘misjudging information subject to disclosure or disclosure’. In addition, some information disclosure managers of police agencies did not comply with the procedures set forth in the Information Disclosure Act and violated them. In addition, some insufficient matters were confirmed in the management of re-disposal according to the purpose of the administrative ruling adjudication of the police agency.
Based on the matters reviewed above, the proposals for the disposition of information disclosure by police agencies can be summarized as follows. First, it is necessary to collect and analyze cases of illegal and unfair rulings by police agencies every year, to produce a casebook of administrative judgment rulings on police information disclosure, and to prepare a system for regular education. Second, it is necessary to examine whether disciplinary responsibility exists for those who have violated the duty of good faith or the duty to comply with the law, which was revealed through the ruling by the Administrative Appeals Commission citing the disposition of illegal or unreasonable information disclosure by the police agency. Third, it is necessary to establish a management and supervision system that can fulfill the duty of redistribution stipulated by law according to the purpose of the ruling specified in the disposition of illegal or unreasonable information disclosure by the police agency.

참고문헌 (Reference)

• 1 김광수, "행정심판제도의 현황과 발전방향" 행정법이론실무학회 (43) : 111-137, 2015
• 2 최선웅, "행정심판의 헌법상 근거— 헌법 제107조 제3항의 해석을 중심으로 —" 행정법이론실무학회 (44) : 43-69, 2016
• 3 국민권익위원회, "행정심판의 이론과 실무" 2022
• 4 정하중, "행정법개론" 법문사 2022
• 5 박균성, "행정법강의" 박영사 2022
• 6 경찰청, "처리기관 접수번호 2AA-2208-0792248"
• 7 경찰청, "처리기관 접수번호 2AA-2208-0792169"
• 8 김현정 ; 김수정, "지방경찰청의 정보공개제도 운영 현황 및 개선 방안 연구 : 부산지방경찰청을 중심으로" 한국기록학회 (68) : 73-105, 2021
• 9 박한호, "정부 3.0시대의 경찰정보공유 논의 - 정보공개 및 공유 체계를 중심으로 -" 한국민간경비학회 15 (15): 77-98, 2016
• 10 경건, "정보공개에서 정보 부존재의 법적 쟁점" 법학연구소 34 (34): 149-190, 2022
• 11 행정안전부, "정보공개 운영 매뉴얼"
• 12 박민정, "자치경찰제 시행 이후 가정폭력 피해자 보호 및 지원 방안 - 전국 지자체 내 가정보호전문센터 신설 -" 사단법인 한국안전문화학회 (13) : 299-310, 2021
• 13 박정훈, "일본의 환경정보공개제도, 그리고 그 평가와 시사" 한국비교공법학회 18 (18): 461-502, 2017
• 14 홍정선, "신행정법특강" 박영사 2022
• 15 "국민권익위원회 2021-9930"
• 16 "국민권익위원회 2021-9417"
• 17 "국민권익위원회 2021-9191"
• 18 "국민권익위원회 2021-7527"
• 19 "국민권익위원회 2021-71"
• 20 "국민권익위원회 2021-6869"
• 21 "국민권익위원회 2021-6639"
• 22 "국민권익위원회 2021-4375"
• 23 "국민권익위원회 2021-35"
• 24 "국민권익위원회 2021-3405"
• 25 "국민권익위원회 2021-2303"
• 26 "국민권익위원회 2021-229"
• 27 "국민권익위원회 2021-12328"
• 28 "국민권익위원회 2021-10612"
• 29 "국민권익위원회 2021-10191"
• 30 "국민권익위원회 2020-6802"
• 31 "국민권익위원회 2020-6424"
• 32 "국민권익위원회 2020-5478"
• 33 "국민권익위원회 2020-5160"
• 34 "국민권익위원회 2020-21158"
• 35 "국민권익위원회 2020-21157"
• 36 "국민권익위원회 2020-18855"
• 37 박호현, "국가수사본부의 합리적 역할방안에 관한 논의 - 국가경찰과 자치경찰의 조직 및 운영에 관한 법률 개정(안)을 중심으로 -" 사단법인 한국안전문화학회 (19) : 31-44, 2022
• 38 홍정화 ; 이광원 ; 조용현, "공공기관의 정보 비공개 행태에 관한 연구: 행정심판례 쟁점분석을 중심으로" 서울행정학회 25 (25): 241-266, 2014
• 39 박종승, "경찰의 정부 3.0 현황 및 개선방안에 관한 연구 : 정보공개제도를 중심으로" 한국경찰학회 18 (18): 79-107, 2016
• 40 손재영, "경찰수사와 정보공개 - 수사서류 비공개의 요건과 한계 -" 법학연구원 (49) : 63-88, 2015
• 41 신관우, "경찰기관의 행정심판 현황과 시사점" 한국공안행정학회 31 (31): 115-142, 2022
• 42 벤자민 ; 정제용, "경찰 신고사건에 대한 사각지대지표 적용을 통한 안전 확보 연구" 사단법인 한국안전문화학회 (12) : 47-58, 2021
• 43 "경찰 부당 법집행 지난해 966건" 내일신문
• 44 김용섭, "검사의 불기소사건기록에 대한 정보공개를 둘러싼 법적 쟁점 ― 대법원 2012. 6. 18. 선고 2011두2361 전원합의체 판결 ―" 행정법이론실무학회 (35) : 1-28, 2013
• 45 김민섭, "「행정심판법」 상 취소심판의 쟁송물" 한양법학회 29 (29): 113-133, 2018
• 46 행정안전부, "2022 정보공개 연차보고서" 2022