중국 문자의 기원에 관한 생각들과 문해력 = Ideas on the Origins of Chinese writing and Literacy

국문 초록 (Abstract)

이 논문은 중국 문자의 출현에 대하여, 중국의 전통적 설명부터 현대의 이론에 이르기까지 다양한 접근들을 비판적으로 검토한다. 전통적 접근은 안양 문자 이전의 토기와 기물에 나타나는 부호들을 대상으로 형태적 유사성을 근거로 문자의 기원을 추적하지만, 그 부호들의 기능과 문자로의 전환에 대하여 여전히 설명하지 못한다. 현대의 접근은 중국의 문자 출현을 단기간의 발명으로 보는 이론과 점진적으로 축적된 문화적 진화의 결과로 보는 견해가 대표적이다. 이 두 가지 가설 역시 우리가 확보한 고고학적 정보 안에서 설명할 수 있는 한계를 넘어선 측면이 있다. 대안적 접근으로 필자는 안양 문자 이전의 자료를 동원하지 않고, 안양 문자 그 자체만으로 문자의 형성과 발전에 대한 진화론적 설명이 가능하다는 것을 제시하였다.

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

This study critically examines various approaches to the emergence of Chinese writing, from traditional accounts to modern theories. The traditional approach traces the origin of Chinese characters back to signs on pottery and artifacts that predate the oracle bone inscriptions excavated in Anyang, based on morphological similarities. However, this approach fails to clarify the functions of those signs and their transition into characters. Modern theories include, on the one hand, the idea that the emergence of Chinese writing was a short-term invention, and on the other, the view that it resulted from gradual cultural evolution. Both hypotheses contain elements that go beyond what our current archaeological evidence can explain. As an alternative, I propose an evolutionary explanation for the formation and development of characters, relying solely on the oracle bone inscriptions from Anyang, without resorting to earlier archaeological materials.

참고문헌 (Reference)

• 1 黃天樹, "黃天樹甲骨金文論集" 學苑出版社 2014
• 2 許慎, "說文解字" 中華書局 1963
• 3 于省吾, "甲骨文字詁林" 中華書局 1996
• 4 郭沫若, "甲骨文合集" 中華書局 1982
• 5 黃亞平, "漢字起源和漢字體系形成問題的探索與思考—兼談漢字起源‘漸變說’與‘突變說’的融通" (9) : 2020
• 6 裘錫圭, "漢字形成問題的初步探索" 1978
• 7 裘錫圭, "文字學概要 修訂本" 商務印書館 2013
• 8 Adam Smith, "Writing at Anyang: The Role of the Divination Record in the Emergence of Chinese Literacy" University of California 2008
• 9 Wang Haicheng, "Writing and the Ancient State: Early China in Comparative Perspective" Cambridge University Press 2014
• 10 William G. Boltz, "Writing and Literacy in Early China" Washington University Press 2011
• 11 Mark Edward Lewis, "Writing and Authority in Early China" State University of New York Press 1999
• 12 Adam Smith, "Writing &Literacy in Early China" University of Washington Press 2011
• 13 Marvin A. Powell, "Three Problems in the History of Cuneiform Writing:Origins, Direction of Script, Literacy" 15 (15): 1981
• 14 Paola Demattè, "The Origins of Chinese Writing" Oxford University Press 2022
• 15 William G. Boltz, "The Origin and Early Development of the Chinese Writing System" American Oriental Society 1994
• 16 Jerrold S. Cooper, "The First Writing:Script Invention as History and Process" Cambridge University Press 2004
• 17 John Baines, "The First Writing: Script Invention as History and Process" Cambridge University Press 2004
• 18 Robert W. Bagley, "The First Writing: Script Invention as History and Process" Cambridge University Press 2004
• 19 Postgate, Nicholas, "The Evidence for Early Writing: Utilitarian or Ceremonial?" 69 (69): 1995
• 20 Cohen, Laurent, "Specialization within the Ventral Stream: The Case for the Visual Word Form Area" 22 : 2004
• 21 K. C. Chang, "Shang Civilization" Yale University Press 1980
• 22 Stanislas Dehaene, "Reading in the Brain: The New Science of How We Read" Penguin 2009
• 23 David N. Keightley, "Public Work in Ancient China: A Study of Foced Labor in the Shang and Western Zhou" Columbia University 1969
• 24 Lorthar von Falkenhausen, "Issues in Western Zhou Studies: A Review Article" 18 : 1993
• 25 Li Feng, "Early China: A Social and Cultural History" Cambridge University Press 2013
• 26 Constance A. Cook, "Death in Ancient China: The Tale of One Man’s Journey" Brill 2006
• 27 Qiu Xigui, "Chinese Writing" Society for the Study of Early China and Institute of East Asian Studies, University of California 2000
• 28 Adam Smith, "Agency in Ancient Writing" University Press of Colorado 2013
• 29 I. J. Gelb, "A Study of Writing" The University of Chicago Press 1963