미국의 Pro-patent정책과 특허법 개혁안 = Pro-patent Policy and Patent Reform Act of United States

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

Progress of economic globalization in the 21st century, knowledge-based
economy, intellectual property recognized as an important economic infrastructure
of the system. The global environment under WTO. WIPO and intellectual
property protection around IP5 for the establishment of international norms and
international coordination(harmonization) has been in progress for a lively
discussion.
For the protection of U. S. intellectual property rights, and events focused on
Pro-patent policy to pursue. Because the proportion of patents in the U. S.
economy is large and important industries such as drugs and biotechnology drugs
and new content or software from the leading-edge technologies to protect U. S.
economic policy is very beneficial.
The goal of patent law reforms to improve the quality of patents, U. S. patent
system for the modernization of the global environment at will. In the Senate of the
United States to facilitate innovation and competition and patent law and policy to
maintain a proper balance in the direction of the reform is expected to review it.
Since 1990, the U. S. domestic patent applications increased from 2006 to
overtake Japan as the world’s No.1. As the application of the best country in the
world, PTO has been facing the challenge of piling up of patent applications and
recruiting patent examiner recruitment and training is a problem. As Patent Troll
appeared to abuse the patent system, a global company has cooperated mutually
to combat it. The ultimate goal of the patent system through the technology
innovation is to obtain economic benefits. To continue to promote technological
innovation, intellectual property protection and competition policy is desirable to
maintain the balance. Our Korean companies should strengthen patent
management in order to exercise technical competence in the international stage.
For preparation for coming into effect of U. S. Pro-patent policy and patent reform
bill, Korean government should research the Patent Law Reform Bill and Pro-patent
policy of the U. S. in depth and is expected to respond it

참고문헌 (Reference)

• 1 김정중, "특허분쟁의 적극적 대응을 위한 Power Patenting 전략" 한국전자산업진흥회 2008
• 2 김원준, "특허법원론" 박영사 2009
• 3 최승재, "특허법상 가처분에 대한 연구 - 미국 법원의 eBay 사건 이후의 태도와 한국 법원의 태도를 비교하여" 대한변리사회 (1) : 2008
• 4 조채영, "특허대상 - 특허 대상 확대 여부에 관한 논의를 중심으로" 4 (4): 2009
• 5 배진용, "특허권 관리회사(Patent Troll)의 현황과 적법성에 관한 연구" 한국산업재산권법학회 (25) : 29-84, 2008
• 6 특허청, "지식재산권 용어 사전"
• 7 특허청, "주요국 특허법 개정 및 판례동향"
• 8 Ronald J. Kubovclk, "일본과 미국에 있어서 Pro-patent정책" 57 (57): 2004
• 9 小野 新次郞, "유럽을 중심으로 한 知財의 세계사정의 현상 및 향후" 61 (61): 22008
• 10 이해영, "미국특허법" 한빛지적소유권센터 2001
• 11 김민희, "미국의 Pro-patent 정책" 특허청 2000
• 12 김민희, "미국에서의 Patent Troll 관련 최근 쟁점과 판결 : Pro-innovation 위협 or Invention Capitalism 촉진" 특허청 2009
• 13 박준국, "미국 특허실무" 한빛지적소유권센터 1995
• 14 Ben Ikenson, "PATENTS" 미래사 2005
• 15 김태만, "2007년 미국 특허법 개정 동향 및 전망" 특허청 2007