서울시 도시재생 2.0을 위한 중간지원조직 역할의 재검토 = Reconsiderations of the Intermediary Organization for Urban Regeneration 2.0 in Seoul

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

Since the announcement of Urban Regeneration 2.0 in Seoul, the Seoul urban regeneration project is taking a new turn. This study aims to make suggestions regarding directional moves for Seoul’s intermediary organization. The interview data limited to the answers involving the problems and limitations of the intermediary organization of the Seoul Package Lab proceeded by the Seoul Metropolitan Council were reanalyzed. Based on this database, five factors that influenced securing sustainability of the intermediary organization were identified; Suwon Sustainable City Foundation was suggested as an alternative case for finding an adaptable counterplan to the actual regeneration project. The analysis results of these five factors revealed it was necessary to find alternatives for securing stable employment to increase the efficiency and the quality of this project. Therefore, a potential alternative was proposed for a new form of an intermediary organization that comprehensively looks at urban problems in various dimensions. For a smooth urban regeneration project operation, it was suggested to ensure a certain legal status for domestic urban regeneration intermediary organizations. Efforts for securing autonomy from the administration should be prepared with complementary attempts and efforts by both the administration and these organizations. Lastly, a clear division of roles between city-local-community level intermediary organizations should be supplemented in the guidelines for urban regeneration New Deal projects.

국문 초록 (Abstract)

본 연구는 새롭게 발표된 서울시 도시재생 2.0을 맞이하여 서울시 중간지원조직이 추후 어떠한 방향으로 나아갈 것인가에 대한 시사점을 제시하는데 연구의 목적이 있다. 이 연구는 서울특별시의회 주관으로 수행한 연구자료에서 서울을 포함한 도시재생사업 관련 다양한 이해관계자들의 심층 인터뷰를 재분석하여, 중간지원조직의 지속성 담보에 영향을 미치는 5가지 요인들을 도출하였다. 전문가 조언을 바탕으로 고용의 안정성, 자생기반의 확보를 내부요인으로 분류하였고, 법적 지위, 제도적 유연성, 행정으로부터의 독립성 확보를 외부요인으로 분류하였다. 5가지 요인이 중간지원조직의 지속성 담보에 영향을 미치는 요인들이라고 가정하고, 각각의 요인들을 자문단이 제안한 수원도시재단과 대응하여 비교·분석하였다. 결론적으로 수원시도시재단은 고용의 안정성, 자생기반 확보, 제도적 유연성 등의 대내외적 요인에 관하여서 모두 모범사례로 나타났다. 다만, 서울과 수원 모두 불안정한 법적지위에 관한 이슈는 여전히 개선이 필요함이 드러나 중간지원조직의 법적 지위 보장이 중요한 요소이자 개선이 시급한 것으로 분석되었다.

참고문헌 (Reference)

• 1 김영환, "중간지원조직으로서 도시재생지원센터의 역할과 운영 방안 - 충청북도 사례를 중심으로 -" 한국산학기술학회 21 (21): 448-459, 2020
• 2 한연오 ; 정은진, "심층인터뷰 기법을 활용한 도시재생지원센터 역할 개선방안 연구 - 광역도시재생지원센터를 중심으로 -" 한국도시부동산학회 12 (12): 155-178, 2021
• 3 이기태 ; 하현상, "마을공동체 활성화를 위한 중간지원조직의 역할 - 거래비용이론 관점에서 -" 한국정책학회 25 (25): 455-490, 2016
• 4 박성남 ; 서수정 ; 임강륜, "도시재생지원기구의 역할 및 지원방향에 관한 연구 - 전문가 그룹별 인식 비교를 토대로" 한국도시설계학회 16 (16): 29-46, 2015
• 5 전수빈 ; 이지혜 ; 김정빈, "도시재생 거점시설 운영 방법으로서 민간위탁 제도에 관한 연구: ‘잘생겼다 서울’의 민간위탁 운영 사례를 중심으로" 한국도시부동산학회 10 (10): 5-23, 2019
• 6 Park, J.D., "Suwon City wins best local government award for ‘Urban Regeneration New Deal’ achievement"
• 7 In, S.M., "Suwon City Sustainable City Foundation and Suwon Urban Development Corporation signed the "Business Agreement for sustainable development"" Goodtimes
• 8 "Suwon City Framework Ordinance on Promotion of And Support for Urban Regeneration"
• 9 "Special Act on Promotion of And Support for Urban Regeneration"
• 10 Lee, Y.C., "Seoul Metropolitan Government’s budget cut and residents’ projects are likely to drift" TBS News
• 11 "Seoul Metropolitan City Framework Ordinance On Social Economy"
• 12 Jo, S. J., "Role Reestablishment of The Urban Regeneration Support Center : Focused on Three Case Study in Ansan" Hanyang University 2022
• 13 Park, S. H., "Rebuilding intermediary organizations for urban regeneration in Korea: A government-civil society relation perspective" KRIHS 17-103, 2014
• 14 Seoul Metropolitan Government, "Inducement of private development in Seoul and link to redevelopment: Great transformation to 「Urban Regeneration 2.0」" Seoul Metropolitan Government
• 15 Lim, S. Y., "Implications of intermediary organization for urban regeneration new deal’s successful driving" 1-8, 2018
• 16 Seoul Metropolitan Government, "Current Status of ‘Seoul-style Urban Regeneration’" Seoul Metropolitan Government
• 17 An, S. W., "Consolidating the role of intermediary organization for local-driven urban regeneration" 433 : 36-45, 2017
• 18 Kim, K., "Between the state and citizens: Changing governance of intermediary organisations for inclusive and sustainable urban regeneration in Seoul" 105 : 105433-, 2021
• 19 강한나, "Analysing Capacity Factors for Urban Sustainability Transformations - The ‘Eco-capital Suwon’ in South Korea -" 한국생태환경건축학회 21 (21): 5-16, 2021
• 20 Ryoo, S. L., "A study on the introduction of “Package Lab” to revitalize urban regeneration projects in Seoul" Seoul Metropolitan Council 61-85, 2021
• 21 Choe, J. K., "A study on the current status and revitalization of social economy support organization in local government" Gyeonggi Research Institute 13-34, 2018
• 22 Kim, H. J., "A study on growth plan of urban regeneration intermediary organization" LHI Land & Housing Institute 13-170, 2016
• 23 Choi, I. S., "A research on possibility of improvement for sustainability of local governments’ intermediary organizations" Korea Research Institute For Local Administration 13-239, 2020
• 24 Jeoun, B. S., "A development strategy of intermediary organizations leading governance in seoul, The Seoul Institute" The Seoul Institute 3-190, 2018