생태복원용 식물종 선정을 위한 지표의 중요도·우선순위 = Importance and Priority of Indicators for Selection of Plant Species for Ecological Restoration

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

Ecological restoration is considered a good means to prevent biodiversity loss in terms of the ecosystem’s health and sustainability. However, there are difficulties in putting it into practice as there is no comprehensive and objective standard for the selection of plant species, such as environmental, ecological factors, and restoration goal setting. Therefore, this study developed an evaluation index necessary for selecting plant species for restoration using the Delphi method that synthesizes the opinions of the expert group. A survey with 38 questionnaires was conducted twice for experts in ecological restoration, etc., and the importance and priority of evaluation indicators were analyzed by dividing the restoration targets into inland and island regions. The result of the importance analysis showed that “native plants” had the highest average of 4.9 among the evaluation indices in both inland and island regions, followed by “seed security”, “propagation”, and “root growth rate”. In the inland region, the index priority was analyzed in the order of “native plants”, “appearance frequency”, “root growth rate”, “distribution range”, and “seed security” in the island region, it was analyzed in the order of “native plants”, “root growth rate”, “appearance frequency”, “distribution range”, and “tolerance”, showing slight differences between the two indicators. As a result of the importance and priority indicator analysis, we set the mean importance and priority of 4.1 and 2.9, respectively, in the inland region and 4.2 and 2.9, respectively, in the island region. As for the criteria of selecting plant species for ecological restoration, the “native plants” had the highest importance and priority. “Seed securing”, 'viability”, “topography”, “proliferation”, “tolerance”, “soil conditions”, “growth characteristics”, “early succession”, “distribution range”, “appearance frequency”, and “germination rate” were classified into subgroups of low importance and priority. The lowest indicators were “final stage of succession”, “transition period”, 'transition stage”, “root”, “reproduction”, “soil”, “appearance”, “technology”, “landscape”, “climate”, and “germination rate”. We expected that the findings through objective verification in this study would be used as evaluation indicators for selecting native plant species for ecological restoration.

국문 초록 (Abstract)

생태복원은 생태계의 건강성과 지속성에 있어 생물다양성의 손실을 막을 수 있는 좋은 수단으로 인식되어 있으나 식물종 선정에 관한 환경, 생리·생태요인, 복원목표 설정 등 종합이고 객관적인 기준점이 없어 실행에 옮기는데 애로사 항이 있다. 이에 전문가 그룹의 의견을 종합하는 델파이 기법을 활용하여 생태복원용 식물종을 선정하는데 필요한 평가지표를 개발하였다. 생태복원 등의 전문가를 대상으로 2회에 걸쳐 38부의 설문조사를 시행하여, 복원 대상지를 내륙과 도서 지역으로 나눠 평가지표의 중요도와 우선순위를 분석했다. 중요도 분석 결과, ‘자생식물’이라는 평가지표 가 내륙과 도서 지역에서 모두 평균 4.9로 가장 높았다. 다음 ‘종자확보’, ‘증식’, 활착률’ 순으로 높았다. 내륙의 지표 우선순위는 ‘자생식물’, ‘출현빈도’, ‘활착율’, ‘분포범위’, ‘종자확보’로 도서 지역은 ‘자생식물’, ‘활착율’, ‘출현빈도’, ‘분포범위’, ‘내성’ 순으로 나타났다. 중요도와 우선순위 분석을 수행한 결과 ‘내륙의 중요도 평균값은 4.1, 우선순위 2.9로 도서지역은 중요도 평균값은 4.2, 우선순위 2.9로 기준을 설정하였다. 생태복원용 식물종 선정의 중요도와 우선순 위는 ‘자생식물’이 중요도와 우선순위가 가장 높은 것으로 나타났다. 다음은 ‘종자확보’, ‘활착율’, ‘지형’, ‘증식’, ‘내 성’, ‘토양조건’, ‘생육특성’, ‘천이초기’, ‘분포범위’, ‘출현빈도’, ‘발아율’이 중요도와 우선순위가 낮은 하위 그룹으로 분류되었다. 가장 낮은 지표는 ‘천이 최종단계’, ‘천이장기’, ‘천이중기’, ‘뿌리’, ‘번식’, ‘토양’, ‘성상’, ‘기술’, ‘경관’, ‘기후’, ‘발아율’로 구분되었다. 이에, 생태복원용 식물종 선정을 위해 객관적 검증을 통한 생태복원용 자생식물 종 선정을 위한 평가지표로 복원사업에 활용되기를 기대한다.

참고문헌 (Reference)

• 1 손희정 ; 김도희 ; 김나영 ; 홍진표 ; 송영근, "훼손된 도시생태계 생태복원 평가지표 제시 및 복원성과 분석" 한국환경복원기술학회 22 (22): 97-114, 2019
• 2 윤종학 ; 김중현 ; 오경희 ; 이병윤, "한반도 난온대 상록활엽수의 분포변화 및 기후조건" 한국환경생태학회 25 (25): 47-56, 2011
• 3 이정 ; 김사랑, "중요도-만족도(ISA) 분석을 활용한 생태도시 매력요인에 관한 연구 - 전남 순천시를 대상으로 -" 한국조경학회 42 (42): 52-64, 2014
• 4 김보미 ; 이동근, "전통적 IPA(Importance-Performance Analysis)와수정된 IPA의 비교연구; 순천만 습지를 대상으로" 한국조경학회 45 (45): 40-50, 2017
• 5 김도균, "순천만 해안방풍림 조성을 위한 생태학적 식재모델 개발" 한국환경복원기술학회 14 (14): 89-104, 2011
• 6 조동길, "생태복원 식물종 사용 실태에 관한 연구 - 생태계보전협력금 반환사업을 중심으로 -" 한국환경생태학회 35 (35): 525-547, 2021
• 7 Park, S. C., "Understanding of futurology" Chongmok Publisher 248-, 2013
• 8 Matthews, J. W., "Trajectories of vegetation-based indicators used to assess wetland restoration progress" 19 (19): 2093-2107, 2009
• 9 Global Futures Studies Association, "The strategic methodology for futures studies" Dunam 560-, 2014
• 10 Society for Ecological Restoration, "The SER Primer on Ecological Restoration"
• 11 National Institute of Forest Science, "The Container Tree Nursery Manual-Harvesting, Storage, Handing and Shipping"
• 12 Pimm, S., "The Balance of Nature? Ecological Issues in the Conservation of Species and Communities" University of Chicago Press 448-, 1991
• 13 Andres, P., "Soil mesofaunal responses to post-mining restoration treatments" 33 (33): 67-78, 2006
• 14 Brown, R. W., "Selecting Plant Species for Ecological Restoration : A Perspective for Land Managers" 8 : 1-16, 1999
• 15 Oh, K. K., "Restoration model of evergreen broad-leaved forests in warm temperate region(Ⅰ)-Vegetational structure-" 10 (10): 87-102, 1996
• 16 Ruiz-Jaen, M.C., "Restoration Success:How Is It Being Measured?" 13 (13): 569-577, 2005
• 17 Kim Y. S., "Restoration Model of Evergreen Broad-leaved forests in Warm Temperate Region(V)-Restoration Strategies of the Case Study Areas-" 11 (11): 61-83, 1997
• 18 Piqueray, J. B., "Rapid restoration of a species-rich ecosystem assessed from soil and vegetation indicators : The case of calcareous grasslands restored from forest stands" 11 (11): 724-733, 2011
• 19 Clements, F. E., "Plant succession: An analysis of the Development of Vegetation" Garnegie Inst. Washington Pub 512-, 1916
• 20 Korea Ministry of Government Legislation, "Instructions for carrying out the seedling business"
• 21 Suganuma, M. S., "Indicators of restoration success in riparian tropical forests using multiple reference ecosystems" 23 (23): 238-251, 2015
• 22 Martilla, J. A., "Importance-performance analyses" 41 : 77-79, 1977
• 23 Siddig, A. A. H., "How do ecologists select and use indicator species to monitor ecological change? Insights from 14 years of publication in Ecological Indicators" 60 : 223-230, 2016
• 24 Clewell, A., "Guidelines for Developing and Managing Ecological Restoration Projects" Society for Ecological Restoration International
• 25 Velasquez, E., "GISQ, a multifunctional indicator of soil quality" 39 (39): 3066-3080, 2007
• 26 Cui, B. S., "Evaluating the ecological performance of wetland restoration in the Yellow River Delta, China" 35 (35): 1090-1103, 2009
• 27 Lim, C. Y., "Evaluating the Vegetation Characteristics and Restoration Performance of Restored Deciduous Broad-Leaved Forests-Focusing on the Temperate Central Region of South Korea-" Department of Biological and Environmental Science Graduate School of Dongguk University 2017
• 28 Jung, W. O., "Effects of environmental factors on the stability and vegetation survival in cutting slope of forest roads" 4 (4): 74-83, 2001
• 29 Oh, K. K., "Ecological revegetation engineering" Gwangil Munhwasa 370-, 2009
• 30 Clewell, A. F., "Ecological restoration:Principles, values, and structure of an emerging profession" Island Press 303-, 2013
• 31 Waltz, A. E. M., "Ecological restoration treatments increase butterfly richness and abundance : Mechanisms of response" 12 (12): 85-96, 2004
• 32 Crouzeilles, R., "Ecological restoration success is higher for natural regeneration than for active restoration in tropical forests" 3 : e1701345-, 2017
• 33 Allison, S. K., "Ecological restoration and environmental change" Routledge 21-22, 2012
• 34 Clewell, A. F., "Ecological RestorationPrinciples, Values, and Structure of an Emerging Profession" SER 27-, 2015
• 35 Cho, D. G., "Ecological Restoration Planning Design Volume 2, Ecological Restoration Process Techniques and Practices" Nexus Environmental Design Research Institute Press 578-, 2017
• 36 Waller, P. A., "Developing a species selection index for seed-based ecological restoration in Peninsula Shale Renosterveld, Cape Town" 99 : 62-68, 2015
• 37 Noh, S. Y., "Delphi technique : Forecasting Futures with Professional Insight" 299 : 53-62, 2006
• 38 이상훈 ; 이상혁 ; 이솔애 ; 최재용, "DMZ 주변 훼손지의 생태복원 평가지표 개발" 한국환경복원기술학회 18 (18): 135-151, 2015
• 39 Miyawaki, A., "Creative ecology restoration of native forestry native trees" 16 : 15-25, 1999
• 40 Korea National Arboretum, "Checklist of Vascular Plants in Korea Native Plants"
• 41 Gibson, A. L., "Can local adaptation research in plants inform selection of native plant materials An analysis of experimental methodologies" 9 (9): 1219-1228, 2016
• 42 배윤지, "A Study on the Future Clothing Trend in Korea - Based on the Future Research by 2040 -" The Korean Society of Fashion Design 16 (16): 151-162, 2016
• 43 Kang, H. M., "A Study for Restoration Effects Through Monitoring of Forest Ecosystem Restoration Types" Department of Landscape Architecture The Graduate School Pusan National University 2014
• 44 박석곤 ; 최송현 ; 이상철, "A Review of Vegetation Succession in Warm‐Temperate Evergreen Broad‐Leaved Forests" Korea Society of Environment and Ecology 32 (32): 77-96, 2018