법치주의의 현대적 변화와 투명성에 대한 헌법적 고찰

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

With the rapid changes of modern society in the area of constitutional issues that require a lot of new debate is emerging. Likewise, with regards to the principle of rule of law new problems are raising and the rule of law is at risk.
First, the development of party politics, legislative and executive powers are consistently integrated. As the realization of the welfare state and overcome of the economic crisis are emphasized, the administration’s authority has been growing relatively. So, the power is concentrated in the executive power, and the classic principle of separation of powers as the governing organization has been questioned it's validity. Next, with fast development of science technology and constant changing international situation, the law is need to respond actively and quickly to this social environment. According to the increasing of the administrative legislation, legal factors that influence the stability of the negative is getting a lot. Finally, complex and rapidly evolving technology is reflected in the law and the law should regulate the highly specialized and segmented society, to meet the needs. So, a request for legal clarity has also shown the possibility of regression.
Today, in the debate on public control of state agencies and many laws on exercise of executive power, transparency is often one of the most mentioned subject. Transparency can be assessed as very important values should be pursued in the information society. Because the start of the rule of law is based on a distrust of the closed executive power, the idea of transparency is inherent itself. Furthermore, essential elements of the rule of law, separation of powers, legal reservation, legal stability, trust protection, the principle of clarity, implicitly reflects the idea of transparency.
The meaning of the rule of law has been determined in the historical development process in response to the social situation. And tansparency can be said that is a key feature for the implementation of the rule of law. As a result, the idea of transparency should be considered and duly weighed in the discussion for the realization of the rule of law to be the constitutional principle appropriate for modern society.

참고문헌 (Reference)

• 1 이부하, "헌법유보와 법률유보" 한국공법학회 36 (36): 201-224, 2008
• 2 김일환, "헌법상 투명성원칙에 관한 試論的 考察" 한국공법학회 39 (39): 369-394, 2010
• 3 백수원, "헌법상 투명성 원칙에 관한 연구" 성균관대학교 2010
• 4 정재황, "헌법개정과 정부형태" 한국공법학회 34 (34): 155-182, 2006
• 5 김일환, "행정정보의 공공이용으로부터 정보자기결정권의 보호에 관한헌법상 고찰" 한국공법학회 32 (32): 113-136, 2004
• 6 임종훈, "한국사회에서의 법치주의에 대한 재조명" 법학연구소 9 (9): 93-115, 2008
• 7 홍준형, "한국 행정법에 있어서의 법치주의의 시련과 과제" 1998
• 8 박흥식, "투명성 가치: 개념적 구조와 의미" 12 (12): 2001
• 9 김일환, "첨단과학기술사회에서 헌법개정의 필요성과 한계에 관한 고찰" 법학연구소 22 (22): 1-24, 2010
• 10 김대환, "참여민주주의, 참여의 철학과 참여민주주의" 창작과 비평사 1997
• 11 윤태범, "정부 투명성 제고를 위한 법・제도적 개혁방안" 2004
• 12 김형남, "정보화시대 법치주의의 의미와 새로운 과제" 법학연구소 14 (14): 125-142, 2002
• 13 문종욱, "정보화사회와 헌법이론의 재구성" 한국법학회 1999
• 14 류시조, "법치주의의 전개와 현대적 과제" 11 : 2000
• 15 하주영, "민주주의와 법의 지배" 후마니타스 2008
• 16 Dahl, Robert A., "민주주의" 동명사 2009
• 17 권영설, "미국헌법상 적법절차의 법리와 그 전개" 1 : 1990
• 18 김명재, "멀티미디어 시대에 있어서의 통치기구의 변화" 28 (28): 2000
• 19 김상겸, "기본권보장과 법치국가" 6 : 1999
• 20 박규환, "기본권 기능의 발전과정 분석을 통한 법치주의 이론의 재구성" 한국비교공법학회 5 (5): 191-212, 2004
• 21 이승우, "국가와 국가권력의 본질과 과제" 7 (7): 2001
• 22 이상해, "憲法上 公開性原則과 인터넷選擧의 可能性" 한국비교공법학회 11 (11): 301-337, 2010
• 23 강승식, "大統領의 全體 國民 代表性에 관한 批判的 考察" 미국헌법학회 21 (21): 53-86, 2010
• 24 Häberle, Peter, "Öffentlichkeitsarbeit der Regierung zwischen Parteien- und Bürgerdemokratie, In ders., Verfassung als öffentlicher Prozeß, Aufl.3" Duncker & Humblot 1998
• 25 Florini, Ann, "he Right to know -Transparency for an Open World" Columbia University Press 2007
• 26 Bröhmer, Jṻrgen, "Transparenz als Verfassungsprinzip: Grundgesetz und Europäische Union" Mohr Siebeck 2004
• 27 Holzner, Burkart, "Transparency in Global Change: The Vanguard of the Open Society" University of Pittsbourgh Press 2006
• 28 OECD, "Transparency and Simplification Approaches to Border Procedures: Reflection on the Implementation of GATT Article X Related Proposals in Selected Countries" OECD 2002
• 29 Vishwanath, T., "Towards Transparency in Finance and Governance" The World Bank 1999
• 30 Brin, David, "The Transparent Society-Will Technology Force Us to Choose Between Privacy and Freedom" A Member of the Perseus Books Group 1998
• 31 Hager, Barry M., "The Rule of Law -A Lexicon for Policy Makers" The Mansfield Center for Pacific Affairs 1999
• 32 Peterson, J., "Playing the Transparency Game: Consultation and Policy-making in the European Commission" 73 : 1995
• 33 Dreier, Horst, "Grundgesetz Kommentar, Aufl.2 Bd.2" Mohr Siebeck 2006
• 34 Coquillette, Daniel R., "Francis Bacon" Stanford University Press 1992
• 35 OECD, "Flagship Report on Regulatory Quality" OECD 2001
• 36 Habermas, Jürgen, "Faktizität und Geltung" Suhrkamp 1994
• 37 Kühling, Jürgen, "Erosion demokratischer Öffentlichkeit" DVBl 2008
• 38 Hood, Chistopher, "David, Heald, Transparency -The Key to Better Governance" Oxford University Press 2008
• 39 Kunig, Philip, "Das Rechtsstaatsprinzip -Überlegungen zu seiner Bedeutung für das Verfassungsrecht der Bundesrepublik Deutschland" Mohr Siebeck 1986
• 40 Council of the European Union -General Secretariat, "Council Guide V. Transparency Guide" Office for Official Publications of the European Communities 2004
• 41 Wimmer, Jeffrey, "(Gegen-)Öffentlichkeit in der Mediengesellschaft" VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften 2007