KCI등재
The Impact of Collective Guilt on the Preference for Japanese Products
저자
Maher, Amro A. ; Singhapakdi, Anusorn ; Park, Hyun-Soo ; Auh, Sei-Gyoung
발행기관
학술지명
권호사항
발행연도
2010
작성언어
English
주제어
등재정보
KCI등재
자료형태
학술저널
발행기관 URL
수록면
135-148(14쪽)
제공처
Arab boycotts of Danish products, Australian boycotts of French products and Chinese consumer aversion toward Japanese products are all examples of how adverse actions at the country level might impact consumers' behavior. The animosity literature has examined how consumers react to the adverse actions of other countries, and how such animosity impacts consumers' attitudes and preferences for products from the transgressing country. For example, Chinese consumers are less likely to buy Japanese products because of Japanese atrocities during World War II and the unjust economic dealings of the Japanese (Klein, Ettenson and Morris 1998). The marketing literature, however, has not examined how consumers react to adverse actions committed by their own country against other countries, and whether such actions affect their attitudes towards purchasing products that originated from the adversely affected country. The social psychology literature argues that consumers will experience a feeling called collective guilt, in response to such adverse actions. Collective guilt stems from the distress experienced by group members when they accept that their group is responsible for actions that have harmed another group (Branscombe, Slugoski, and Kappenn 2004). Examples include Americans feeling guilty about the atrocities committed by the U.S. military at Abu Ghraib prison (Iyer, Schamder and Lickel 2007), and the Dutch about their occupation of Indonesia in the past (Doosje et al. 1998). The primary aim of this study is to examine consumers' perceptions of adverse actions by members of one's own country against another country and whether such perceptions affected their attitudes towards products originating from the country transgressed against. More specifically, one objective of this study is to examine the perceptual antecedents of collective guilt, an emotional reaction to adverse actions performed by members of one's country against another country. Another objective is to examine the impact of collective guilt on consumers' perceptions of, and preference for, products originating from the country transgressed against by the consumers' own country. If collective guilt emerges as a significant predictor, companies originating from countries that have been transgressed against might be able to capitalize on such unfortunate events. This research utilizes the animosity model introduced by Klein, Ettenson and Morris (1998) and later expanded on by Klein (2002). Klein finds that U.S. consumers harbor animosity toward the Japanese. This animosity is experienced in response to events that occurred during World War II (i.e., the bombing of Pearl Harbor) and more recently the perceived economic threat from Japan. Thus this study argues that the events of Word War II (i.e., bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki) might lead U.S. consumers to experience collective guilt. A series of three hypotheses were introduced. The first hypothesis deals with the antecedents of collective guilt. Previous research argues that collective guilt is experienced when consumers perceive that the harm following a transgression is illegitimate and that the country from which the transgressors originate should be responsible for the adverse actions. (Wohl, Branscombe, and Klar 2006). Therefore the following hypothesis was offered: H1a. Higher levels of perceived illegitimacy for the harm committed will result in higher levels of collective guilt. H1b. Higher levels of responsibility will be positively associated with higher levels of collective guilt. The second and third hypotheses deal with the impact of collective guilt on the preferences for Japanese products. Klein (2002) found that higher levels of animosity toward Japan resulted in a lower preference for a Japanese product relative to a South Korean product but not a lower preference for a Japanese product relative to a U.S. product. These results therefore indicate that the experience of collective guilt will lea
더보기阿拉伯人?合抵制丹??品, 澳大利?人?合抵制法??品, 而中?人??日本?品, ?些是?家?的??行?影?消?行?的案例. ?意文?中已考??消?者?其他?家??行?的反?, 以及???意如何影?消?者????家?品的?度和?向. 例如, 中?消?者不愿??日本?品, 是由于日本人在第二次世界大?中的暴行, 以及不平等的??往?(Klein, Ettenson and Morris 1998). 然而在市???文?中, 却?有考??那些?他??施??行?的?家消?者的反?, ?些??行?是否?影?他???受害??品的?度. 社?心理?文???, 消?者面???的??行??, ??生一?集?犯罪感. 集?犯罪感源于???成?????要??害其他??的行????所?生的痛苦感(Branscombe, Slugoski, and Kappenn 2004). 案例包括美?人由于美?在Abu Ghraib??的暴行而?生犯罪感(Iyer, Schamder and Lickel 2007), 荷?由于?去?印度尼西?的占?而?生犯罪感(Doosje et al. 1998). 本?究的主要目的是考???家成??他?有??行??消?者的感知, ??感知是否?影?他?????家?品的?度. 更准?的?, 本?究的目?之一是考?集?犯罪感的感知前提, 以及??家成??他?有??行??, 人?的情?反?. ?一?目?是考?集?犯罪感如何影?消?者?????品的感知和?向. 如果集?犯罪感能起到明?的?言作用, ????方的公司可能????不幸的事件中受益. 本?究利用了由Klein, Ettenson and Morris (1998)提出??Klein (2002)?展的?意模式. Klein??美?消?者?日本人?有?意, 起因是二?期?的事件(如日???珍珠港)和近年?日本的??威?. 因此本?究??, 二??的事件(如???崎的原子?爆炸)可能?致美?消?者的集?犯罪感. 曾有?一系列的三?假?, 第一?假??于集?犯罪感的前提. 之前有?究???消?者感知到侵害造成的非法?害, ?且??侵犯者?自的?家??此??, 集?犯罪感就?生了(Wohl, Branscombe, and Klar 2006). 因此提出下列假?: 假?1a: 感知到的?害非法性越高, 集?犯罪感越强烈. 假?1b: ?任越大, 集?犯罪感也肯定越强烈. 第二?和第三?假??于集?犯罪感??向日本?品的影?. Klein (2002)???日本的?意越强, 相比????品?日本?品的?向越小, 但相比?美??品?日本?品的?向?未?小. ?些?果?明集?犯罪感存在?, 消?者在??日本?品和???品??更?向于前者, 但在??日本?品和美??品??未受影?. 假?2: 集?犯罪感???日本?品的?向大于???品有?, 但???日本?品的?向大于美??品无?. 假?3: 集?犯罪感???日本?品的?向大于???品有?, ?且??品的判?和?意保持不?. 有?一???????假?. 使被??者面??生在二?中的??事件, ?而?生非法?害和?任. ???由一家美?的消?者??小?收集?据, ????象?机分配到低等??任和?法情?(n=259)或高等??任和?法情?(n=268). ??假??系?, ?用到?在?量??方程模式(LVSEM). 第一?假?得到了支持, 美?人因二?中?日本人的?害而?生的?害非法性和?任都?集?犯罪感有??影?. 第二?假?也得到了支持, 集?犯罪感???日本?品的?向大于???品有?, 但???日本?品的?向大于美??品无?. 最后, 第三?假?也得到了支持, 集?犯罪感???日本?品的?向大于???品有?, 同??影?人??日本?品的判?和?意. 由?些
더보기분석정보
서지정보 내보내기(Export)
닫기소장기관 정보
닫기권호소장정보
닫기오류접수
닫기오류 접수 확인
닫기음성서비스 신청
닫기음성서비스 신청 확인
닫기이용약관
닫기학술연구정보서비스 이용약관 (2017년 1월 1일 ~ 현재 적용)
학술연구정보서비스(이하 RISS)는 정보주체의 자유와 권리 보호를 위해 「개인정보 보호법」 및 관계 법령이 정한 바를 준수하여, 적법하게 개인정보를 처리하고 안전하게 관리하고 있습니다. 이에 「개인정보 보호법」 제30조에 따라 정보주체에게 개인정보 처리에 관한 절차 및 기준을 안내하고, 이와 관련한 고충을 신속하고 원활하게 처리할 수 있도록 하기 위하여 다음과 같이 개인정보 처리방침을 수립·공개합니다.
주요 개인정보 처리 표시(라벨링)
목 차
3년
또는 회원탈퇴시까지5년
(「전자상거래 등에서의 소비자보호에 관한3년
(「전자상거래 등에서의 소비자보호에 관한2년
이상(개인정보보호위원회 : 개인정보의 안전성 확보조치 기준)개인정보파일의 명칭 | 운영근거 / 처리목적 | 개인정보파일에 기록되는 개인정보의 항목 | 보유기간 | |
---|---|---|---|---|
학술연구정보서비스 이용자 가입정보 파일 | 한국교육학술정보원법 | 필수 | ID, 비밀번호, 성명, 생년월일, 신분(직업구분), 이메일, 소속분야, 웹진메일 수신동의 여부 | 3년 또는 탈퇴시 |
선택 | 소속기관명, 소속도서관명, 학과/부서명, 학번/직원번호, 휴대전화, 주소 |
구분 | 담당자 | 연락처 |
---|---|---|
KERIS 개인정보 보호책임자 | 정보보호본부 김태우 | - 이메일 : lsy@keris.or.kr - 전화번호 : 053-714-0439 - 팩스번호 : 053-714-0195 |
KERIS 개인정보 보호담당자 | 개인정보보호부 이상엽 | |
RISS 개인정보 보호책임자 | 대학학술본부 장금연 | - 이메일 : giltizen@keris.or.kr - 전화번호 : 053-714-0149 - 팩스번호 : 053-714-0194 |
RISS 개인정보 보호담당자 | 학술진흥부 길원진 |
자동로그아웃 안내
닫기인증오류 안내
닫기귀하께서는 휴면계정 전환 후 1년동안 회원정보 수집 및 이용에 대한
재동의를 하지 않으신 관계로 개인정보가 삭제되었습니다.
(참조 : RISS 이용약관 및 개인정보처리방침)
신규회원으로 가입하여 이용 부탁 드리며, 추가 문의는 고객센터로 연락 바랍니다.
- 기존 아이디 재사용 불가
휴면계정 안내
RISS는 [표준개인정보 보호지침]에 따라 2년을 주기로 개인정보 수집·이용에 관하여 (재)동의를 받고 있으며, (재)동의를 하지 않을 경우, 휴면계정으로 전환됩니다.
(※ 휴면계정은 원문이용 및 복사/대출 서비스를 이용할 수 없습니다.)
휴면계정으로 전환된 후 1년간 회원정보 수집·이용에 대한 재동의를 하지 않을 경우, RISS에서 자동탈퇴 및 개인정보가 삭제처리 됩니다.
고객센터 1599-3122
ARS번호+1번(회원가입 및 정보수정)