성경에 있어서의 담보

국문 초록 (Abstract)

민법상 채권 내지 계약을 담보하는 데에는 물적 담보, 인적 담보, 손해담보계약 등이 있다. 성경에서도 여러 가지 경우에 채권을 담보하는 내용이 존재하고 있는데, 현행민법상의 물적담보와 인적 담보와 손해담보계약에 해당한다고 볼 수 있는 사례가 여러 곳에서 발견된다. 성경에서의 담보는 현행민법과 어떠한 경우는 유사한 반면 어떠한 경우는 그 내용이 다르다. 본 논문은 이러한 점들을 사례별로 고찰하여 현행민법의 시각에서 관련된 부분의 성경을 해석함으로써 법학적인 차원에서의 성경해석의 길을 열어 신학적으로 성경을 해석하는 범위를 확대할 수 있도록 할 뿐만 아니라 민법 형성기에 영향을 미친 성경구절의 해석을 통해 민법해석의 새로운 길을 모색하고자 한다.

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

There is physical security and personal security in the security system under Civil law. The former is to guarantee the debt of a debtor or a third party owns certain things, personal security is to guarantee the bonds to third party property, in addition to the usual general property of the debtor. The status of creditors in the physical security is safe because of preferential payment right to other creditors of secured party, but physical security has the disadvantage that the procedure is complicated and that those who do not have the object of physical collateral can not use. But personal security has the advantage of this spread the risk of liability payable by the increase in property total inability to be, since it has the disadvantage still uncertain that the feasibility of the bond depends on the state of the debtor and third parties general property. In addition to these there are damage collateral agreements under which one party for the purpose of this reparation to the detriment of the future arise from certain requirements with respect to the other. There is a section on mortgage bonds in many cases exist in the Bible, in the case can be seen as the personal and physical collateral damage and the contract of the current Civil law is found in many places.
This article aims to study to find out what is the same and the differences between in the Bible and the present Civil Law concerning the security system. In the Bible there are several kinds of security. Israelites established the right of pledge in many cases, which A pledgee of movables is entitled to hold possession of the movables which he has received from the debtor or a third person as security for his claim, and to obtain satisfaction of his claim out of the movables in preference to other creditors. This is very similar to Civil law. But in the Bible clock of widow could not be the object of pledge, Civil law regulates “A thing which cannot be assigned shall not be the object of pledge”. And Bible says “If you take your neighbors cloak as a pledge, return it to him by sunset”, but according to Civil law there is no need for pledgee to return the object of pledge to debtor until he obtains satisfaction of his claim. Bible protects destitute orphans and widows, Civil law does not deal especially with them. A surety is liable to perform the obligation upon which the principal obligor has defaulted. On this Two have the same meaning. So Bible says “Do not be a man who strikes hands in pledge or puts up security for debts”, but Civil law has not such a regulation. And Bible says “Ensure your servants well-being; let not the arrogant oppress me”. Damage security contract in mordern times plays the same role.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• 국문요약
• Ⅰ. 들어가며
• Ⅱ. 물적담보
• Ⅲ. 인적담보
• Ⅳ. 기타담보
• Ⅴ. 맺으며
• 참고문헌
• Abstract

참고문헌 (Reference)

• 1 이영준, "한국민법론, 물권편" 박영사 2004
• 2 곽윤직, "채권총론" 박영사 1994
• 3 장재옥, "징벌적 손해배상 개념의 수용가능성" 법학연구원 39 (39): 81-115, 2015
• 4 김형배, "민법학강의(제15판)" 신조사 2016
• 5 김준호, "민법강의" 법문사 2016
• 6 지원림, "민법강의" 홍문사 2016
• 7 곽윤직, "물권법" 박영사 2002