상권 : 국가배상에 관한 주요 판례분석 -“법령위반(위법성)”을 중심으로- = Volume1 : Case study on the Government Liability -emphasis on the illegality of the administrative activities-

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

According to the constitutional state principle, all administrative activities are expected to be legal. However, in reality, causing damages to the people by illegal administrative activities are inevitable. Therefore, in order to implement the constitutional state principle, devices that regulate illegal activities are required. Moreover, systems to relieve the damages caused by the illegal administrative activities are necessary, which can be represented by the government liability system. Article 2 of the Government Liability Act provides the conditions of government liability for governmental employee`s tort. Given that the government liability has the character of ‘tort liability’, illegality and intention/negligence are the key factors among the conditions. In particular, there are various opinions on the definition of illegality or the standard of judgment, which is described by a Japanese scholar an ‘extremely confusing situation’. This paper lays emphasis on the illegality problem among the conditions of government liability caused by government employee`s tort. First of all, the text of the law about the illegality of the administrative activities in Germany, Japan and Korea is considered, as well as its meanings. Then, following problems are considered: problem whether the essence of illegality in the government liability lies on the activity or the result; problem whether illegality in complaint lawsuit and illegality in lawsuit for government liability is the same; problem whether the protection of private interest of the law that imposes the obligations to government employees is related to illegality or the causality in the government liability. These problems will be considered mainly through the judicial precedents in Japan and Korea.

참고문헌 (Reference)

• 1 홍정선, "행정법특강" 박영사 2013
• 2 박종수, "행정법신론 제14판" 박영사 2010
• 3 김연태, "행정법사례연습" 홍문사 2012
• 4 정하중, "행정법개론" 법문사 2013
• 5 박균성, "행정법강의 제10판" 박영사 2013
• 6 김남진, "행정법 I" 법문사 2013
• 7 김동희, "행정법 I" 박영사 2013
• 8 김중권, "행정법" 법문사 2013
• 9 김남진, "취소소송의 기판력과 국가배상소송과의 관계" 2000
• 10 석종현, "일반행정법(상), 제14판" 삼영사 2013
• 11 정승윤, "국가배상법상 위법과 고의․과실에 관한 대법원 판례 분석․비평" 법학연구원 19 (19): 189-224, 2012
• 12 大浜啓吉, "行政裁判法" 岩波書店 2011
• 13 宇賀克也, "行政法槪說 II" 有斐閣 2011
• 14 磯部力/小早川光郞, "行政法の新構想 Ⅲ,　" 有斐閣 2008
• 15 芝池義一, "行政法の争点(第３版)" 有斐閣 2004
• 16 藤田宙靖, "行政法Ⅰ" 靑林書院 2005
• 17 塩野宏, "行政法 II" 有斐閣 2011
• 18 芝池義一, "行政救濟法講義" 有斐閣 2006
• 19 室井力, "行政事件訴訟法ㆍ國家賠償法" 日本評論社 2006
• 20 西埜章, "明治大學法科大學院開設記念論文集" 2005
• 21 村重慶一, "國家賠償硏究ノート" 判例タイムズ社 1996
• 22 신봉기, "國家賠償法上 違法性의 槪念에 관한 分析 - 日本의 學說 및 判例의 動向을 中心으로 -" 한국토지공법학회 57 : 269-298, 2012
• 23 武田眞一郞, "國家賠償における違法性と過失について" (64) : 2007
• 24 阿部泰隆, "國家補償法" 有斐閣 1988
• 25 西埜章, "国家賠償法コンメンタール" 勁草書房 2012
• 26 宇賀克也, "国家賠償の課題" (1000) : 1992
• 27 稲葉, "国家補償法上の違法性について" 73 (73): 2010
• 28 宇賀克也, "国家補償法" 有斐閣 1997
• 29 山本隆司, "判例から研究する行政法―国家賠償(4)" (356) : 2010
• 30 高木, "公権力発動要件欠如説" 50 (50): 2011
• 31 後藤光男, "人権保障と行政救済法" 成文堂 2010
• 32 Ossenbühl, "Staatshaftungsrecht, 4 Aufl." 1991
• 33 Hofmann, "Allgemeines Verwaltunsrecht, 9 Aufl." 2005
• 34 Maurer, "Allgemeines Verwaltungsrecht., 16 Aufl." 2006
• 35 Ipsen, "Allgemeines Verwaltungsrecht, 8 Aufl." 2012
• 36 Detterbeck, "Allgemeines Verwaltungsrecht mit Verwaltungsprozessrecht, 6 Aufl." 2008