동성혼의 합법화 여부와 입법모델에 관한 연구

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

Modern family relations are proceeding with personalization, equalization, pluralization and de-institutionalization, and the notion of traditional marriage system is also changing. One of the problems of this modern family system is the issue of same-sex marriage.
Marriage can be defined in many ways in general, but when it is defined as a contract in which a man and a woman live together, one man and one woman are not married. Currently in Korea, same-sex unions can not form any legal relationship, so we are not allowed to exercise civil rights. Currently in our country, same-sex unions can not form any legal relationship, so we are not allowed to exercise civil rights. In addition, recent global trends are pushing for legislation on same-sex unions.
We looked at the contents of the European Union agreement that influenced European countries to legalize eastern marriage, as well as the United Kingdom, France, Germany and the United States. Among Asian countries, Taiwan has legalized same-sex marriage. And we examined Japan, which does not recognize same-sex marriage but protects ordinances of local government. There is a similarity in the process of nationalization in Britain, France and Germany. These countries begin with social discussions, are carried out as civil unions or living partnerships, and then the differences between the person in the partnership and the person in the marriage are determined by the legal institution. In the United States, the system of same-sex unions, which was otherwise stipulated in federal and state laws, was recognized throughout the United States by the Supreme Court. Taiwan was allowed to marry the same man in accordance with the Supreme Court ruling while some local governments introduced the system as an ordinance. In Japan, some local governments receive some protection in the form of ordinances and orders, but this is considered the basis for further institutionalization rather than legal effect.
At present, discussions in Korea on the marriage issue show that first, the Supreme Court`s perception of marriage is based on the traditional marriage system. In other words, one man and one woman are said to be the subjects of marriage and apply to specific cases accordingly. Nor has legislation been made. At present, it is doubtful whether marriage can be allowed in Korea. First of all, because of the nature of family law, it is thought that marriage of the same sex is not possible anytime soon. Family law is thought to be formed by various factors such as history, culture, awareness of social members, economic environment, and so on. In particular, there is a question of whether we can live in the traditional family system and win sympathy from the majority of society members or make social arrangements.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• Ⅰ. 서언
• Ⅱ. 동성혼에 관한 외국의 입법례
• Ⅲ. 동성혼에 관한 한국에서의 논의
• Ⅳ. 결어
• 참고문헌
• Abstract

참고문헌 (Reference)

• 1 조홍석, "새로운 형태의 가족: 헌법적 가능성과 한계" 한국비교공법학회 8 (8): 221-242, 2007
• 2 조은희, "사실혼·동거 가족의 법률문제와 해결방안" 법학연구소 12 (12): 103-146, 2009
• 3 김선화, "동성혼의 법제화에 관한 고찰" 젠더법학연구소 7 (7): 31-63, 2015
• 4 이정훈, "동성혼과 생활동반자법에 관한 연구 - 동성생활동반자의 혼인신고 불수리처분에 대한 불복신청 사건 (서울서부지방법원 2014호파 1842)을 중심으로 -" 법학연구소 32 (32): 71-98, 2016
• 5 성중탁, "동성(同性)혼에 관한 최신 미연방대법원 OBERGEFELLETAL. v. HODGES 사건 판례와 그 시사점" 법학연구원 (53) : 1-29, 2016
• 6 김민중, "동성(同性) 간의 결합에 대한 법적 보호" 동북아법연구소 10 (10): 191-240, 2016
• 7 鳥澤孝之, "諸外国の同性パートナーシップ制度" 国立国会図書館調査及び立法考査局 (711) : 2010
• 8 独立行政法人, "諸外国のLGBTの就労をめぐる状況" 独立行政法人　労働政策研究・研修機構 2016
• 9 松信ひろみ, "結婚の社会的承認としての同性パートナーシップ" 駒澤大学文学部社会学科 (48) : 2016
• 10 Cheryl Wetzstein, "米国における同性婚―その経緯と展望―" 平和政策研究所 (5) : 2015
• 11 渡邉泰彦, "生活パートナーシップに関する2002年7月17日連邦憲法裁判所判決について" 徳島文理大学 (65) : 2003
• 12 大島梨沙, "渋谷区同性パートナーシップ条例の意義と課題" 日本評論社 (727) : 2015
• 13 渋谷区, "渋谷区パートナーシップ証明実態調査報告書, 渋谷男⼥平等・ダイバーシティセンター<アイリス>" 渋谷区 2017
• 14 小畑郁, "婚姻のポリティクス(一)―アメリカの同性婚訴訟を中心に―" 有斐閣 137 (137): 2007
• 15 服部有希, "同性婚法の成立" 国立国会図書館調査及び立法考査局 256 (256): 2013
• 16 村山美樹, "同性婚をめぐる憲法上の議論―ドイツとの比較を通じて―" 大学院研究年報　法学研究科 (46) : 2017
• 17 根本猛, "同性婚とアメリカ合衆国憲法(中村和夫先生・古口章先生退職記念号)" 静岡大学 (8) : 2016
• 18 渡邉泰彦, "同性の生活パートナーシップとは?―ドイツ生活パートナーシップ法成立をめぐる議論" 徳島文理大学 (62) : 2001
• 19 小畑郁, "ヨーロッパ人権条約における国内的実施の進展と補完性原理―知のヘゲモニーと埋め込まれた不平等" 日本評論社 80 (80): 2008
• 20 山口龍之, "フランスの新家族制度・民事連帯協約(PACS)について" 沖縄大学法学会 (21) : 1999
• 21 佐藤雄一郎, "フランスの憲法判例 II" 信山社 2013
• 22 大島梨沙, "フランスにおける非婚カップルの法的保護(2・完)―パックスとコンキュビナージュの研究―" 北海道大学大学院法学研究科 58 (58): 2007
• 23 大島梨沙, "フランスにおける非婚カップルの法的保護(1)―パックスとコンキュビナージュの研究―" 北海道大学大学院法学研究科 57 (57): 2007
• 24 北原零未, "フランスにおける同性婚法の成立と保守的家族主義への回帰" 中央大学経済研究所 (45) : 2014
• 25 内閣府経済社会総合研究所, "フランスとドイツの家庭生活調査" 内閣府経済社会総合研究所 2005
• 26 渡邉泰彦, "ドイツ生活パートナーシップ法の概観(1)" 東北学院大学学術研究会 (65) : 2006
• 27 捧剛, "イギリスにおける同性愛者差別の撤廃とシヴィル・パートナーシップ" 国学院大学法学会 48 (48): 2010
• 28 정영화, "‘동성혼’ 도입을 위한 헌법개정의 위헌성 -미국 연방대법원 ‘동성혼’ 판례의 ‘인간존엄’ 해석의 분석-" 법학연구소 18 (18): 121-150, 2017
• 29 Sir John Wolfenden, "Report of the Departmental Committee on Homosexual Offences and Prostitution" Greenwood Press 1957
• 30 Catherine Fairbaim, "Marriage (Same Sex Couples) Bill" House of Commons Library 2013
• 31 François Hollande, "Le Changement c＇est maintenant, mes 60 engagements pour la France mes 60 engagements pour la france" Sciences Po 2012
• 32 Kate Standley, "Family Law" Palgrave 2013
• 33 Andrew Burrows, "English Private Law" Oxford Univ. Press 2007
• 34 Gillian Douglas, "21世紀の家族と法: 小野幸二教授古稀記念論集" 法学書院 2007