예비교사들의 사회적 실재론에 근거한 강력한 지식구성 방안: Web GIS를 활용한 지역문제해결 팀프로젝트 활동을 중심으로 = Constructing Powerful Knowledge based on Social Realism of Pre-service Teachers: Focusing on the Utilization of Web GIS

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

In the era of artificial intelligence, knowledge needs to transition from theoretical to practical, becoming powerful knowledge that can be realized. The purpose of this study is to examine the educational background of a new realism as a theoretical basis for powerful knowledge and the social realism within realism, and to explore how theoretical knowledge, based on social realism, can combine with practical knowledge to form powerful knowledge that exists independently of learners' experiences. To achieve this research objective, the study designed a team project class utilizing Web GIS as a GeoCapability for the construction of powerful geographical knowledge through setting current local issues for preservice teachers. According to the research findings, preservice teachers constructed powerful knowledge by combining theoretical knowledge with practical knowledge during the process of using Web GIS, a technology of big data and data-based 4th industrial revolution, to solve local problems. This process led to the expansion of community consciousness, responsibility, and global spatial citizenship, resulting in changes in values and attitudes towards life. Beyond the construction of knowledge related to regional problem solving based on the region concept, changes have occurred in the life values and attitudes of pre-service teachers as they expanded to community spirit, responsibility, and global spatial citizenship. Furthermore, this study demonstrates the project-based teaching and learning process that constructs powerful knowledge by combining knowledge that exists beyond experiences with the utilization of GeoCapability-based knowledge construction such as Web GIS, highlighting the potential for applying this approach to various topics and academic disciplines that reflect learners' everyday lives.

국문 초록 (Abstract)

인공지능 시대 지식은 이론적 지식이 실천적 지식으로 전환되고 그 지식은 실재 할 수 있는 강력한 實在 지식이 되어야 한다 본 연구의 목적은 강력한 지식에 대한 이론적 근거인 새로운 실재론과 실재론 중 사회적 . 실재론에 대한 교육적 배경을 고찰하고 나아가 사회적 실재론에 근거하여 이론적 지식이 어떻게 학습자의 실천적인 , 지식과 결합하여 학습자의 경험밖에도 독립적으로 실재할 수 있는 강력한 지식구성이 될 수 있는가를 검증하는 것이다 이러한 연구목적을 달성하기 위해 예비교사들은 지역의 현안문제를 해결하기 위해 로서 . GeoCapability Web GIS를 활용하여 강력한 지리적 지식 구성을 할 수 있도록 팀 프로젝트 수업을 설계하였다 연구결과에 . 따르면 예비교사들은 빅데이터 내지 데이터 기반의 차 산업의 기술인 를 활용한 지역 문제해결 과정에 , 4 Web GIS 서 이론적 지식을 기반으로 실천적 지식과 결합하여 강력한 지식을 구성하는 과정에서 지역개념에 기반한 지역문제 해결관련 체계적인 지식구성을 너머 공동체의식과 책임감 글로벌 공간시민성으로 확장하면서 예비교사의 삶의 , , 가치 태도에 이르기까지 변화가 나타났다 본 연구는 또한 와 같은 기반 지식구성의 , . Web GIS GeoCapability 도구를 통해 학습자 삶에서 실질적인 문제를 해결하고 학습자의 경험 밖에 존재하는 지식과 결합을 통해 강력한 , 지식을 구성하는 프로젝트 교수 학습 과정을 보여 주는 것에 의의가 있다 아울러 를 활용한 강력한 ⋅ . Web GIS 지식 구성은 학습자의 일상생활을 반영한 다양한 주제와 학문 분야로의 활용 가능성을 시사하고 있다.

참고문헌 (Reference)

• 1 김민성, "힘있는 지식의 의미와 지리학습전략" 한국지리학회 10 (10): 1-17, 2021
• 2 조철기, "영국 국가지리교육과정 개정과 지식 논쟁" 대한지리학회 49 (49): 456-471, 2014
• 3 岩內章太郞, "새로운 철학 교과서: 현대 실재론 입문" 도서출판b 2020
• 4 이성회, "사회적 실재론(social realism)의 지식관이 역량기반 교육과정 정책에 주는 시사점" 한국교육개발원 48 (48): 137-166, 2021
• 5 황홍섭, "빅데이터를 활용한 초등사회과 강력한 지식 구성방안 : 여행지도 만들기를 통한 지역관광 현안문제해결 프로젝트를 사례로" 한국사회과교육연구학회 61 (61): 97-122, 2022
• 6 황홍섭, "빅데이터를 활용한 단일 및 다중 스케일의 네트워크적 영역성 규명과 교육적 활용방안 -부산시 해운대를 사례로-" 한국사진지리학회 29 (29): 1-17, 2019
• 7 소경희, "교육과정 지식 논쟁: Michael Young의 ‘강력한 지식’ 논의에 대한 비판적 검토" 한국교육과정학회 39 (39): 35-60, 2021
• 8 Wrigley, T., "‘Knowledge’, curriculum and social justice" 29 (29): 4-24, 2018
• 9 Maude, A., "What might powerful geographical knowledge look like?" 101 (101): 70-76, 2016
• 10 Fargher, M., "WebGIS for geography education : Towards a GeoCapabilities approach" 7 (7): 111-, 2018
• 11 Gabriel, M., "Warum es die Welt nicht gibt" Ullstein Taschenbuch 2017
• 12 Young, M., "Three educational scenarios for the future: Lessons form the sociology of knowledge" 45 (45): 11-27, 2010
• 13 Lambert, D., "The sage handbook of curriculum, pedagogy and assessment" Sage 391-407, 2015
• 14 Young, M., "The return to subjects : A sociological perspective on the UK Coalition government's approach to the 14-19 curriculum" 22 (22): 265-278, 2011
• 15 Nussbaum, M., "The quality of life" Oxford University Press 1993
• 16 Moore, R., "The discourse of ‘voice’ and the problem of knowledge and identity in the sociology of education" 20 (20): 189-206, 1999
• 17 Bustin, R., "The development of GeoCapabilities : Reflections, and he spread of an idea" 29 (29): 201-205, 2020
• 18 Boehm, R. G., "The Rise of powerful geography" 109 (109): 125-135, 2018
• 19 Moore, R., "Social realism and the problem of the problem of knowledge in the sociology of education" 34 (34): 333-353, 2013
• 20 Rouse, J., "Social Practices and Normativity" 37 (37): 46-56, 2007
• 21 Lambert, D., "Rediscovering the teaching of geography with the focus on quality" 30 : 8-15, 2017
• 22 Carlgren, I., "Powerful knowns and powerful knowings" 52 (52): 323-336, 2020
• 23 Stoltman, J., "Powerful knowledge in geography : RGEE editors interview Professor David Lambert, London Institute of Education, October 2014" 24 : 1-5, 2015
• 24 Hordern, J., "Powerful knowledge and knowledgeable practice" 54 (54): 196-209, 2022
• 25 Balarin, M., "Post-structuralism, realism and the question of knowledge in educational sociology : A derridian critique of social realism in education" 6 (6): 507-527, 2008
• 26 Bernstein, B., "Pedagogy, symbolic control and identity: theory, research, critique" Oxford University Press 2000
• 27 Young, M., "Overcoming the crisis in curriculum theory : A knowledge-based approach" 45 (45): 101-118, 2013
• 28 Daston, L., "Objectivity" Zone Books 2007
• 29 Firth, R., "Making geography visible as an object of study in the secondary school curriculum" 22 (22): 289-316, 2011
• 30 Muller, J., "Knowledge, power and powerful knowledge re-visited" 30 (30): 196-214, 2019
• 31 Young, M., "Knowledge and control: New directions for the sociology of Education" Collier-Macmillan 1971
• 32 Donert, K., "Innovative pedagogies series:GeoCapabilities" Higher Education Academy 2015
• 33 Beneker, T., "Inaugural lecture: Powerful konwldege in geography education" Utrecht University 2018
• 34 AAG (Association of American Geographers), "Guidelines for geographic education, elementary, and secondary schools"
• 35 Firth, R., "Geography, education and the future" Continuum 141-164, 2011
• 36 GESP(Geography Education Standards Project), "Geography for life: National Geography Standards 1994"
• 37 Maude, A., "Geography and powerful knowledge : A contribution to the debate" 27 (27): 179-190, 2018
• 38 Slater, F., "Geography and powerful knowledge" 25 : 189-192, 2016
• 39 Lambert, D., "Geographical knowledge, understanding and skills for life beyond school" 19 (19): 39-50, 2010
• 40 Uhlenwinkel, A., "GeoCapabilities and curriculum leadership : Balancing the priorities of aim-based and knowledge-led curriculum thinking in schools" 26 (26): 327-341, 2017
• 41 Solem, M., "GeoCapabilities : Toward an international framework for researching the purposes and values of geography education" 3 (3): 214-229, 2013
• 42 Moore, R., "Education and society: Issues and explanations in the sociology of education" Polity Press 2004
• 43 Walkington, H., "Developing and assessing the impact of a primary school geocapability framework" 46 (46): 61-73, 2018
• 44 Young, M., "Curriculum and the specialization of knowledge. Studies in the sociology of education" Routledge 2016
• 45 Archer, M., "Critical reaslim:essential readings" Routledge 1998
• 46 Bhaskar, R., "Critical realism:essential readings" Routledge 1998
• 47 Collier, A, "Critical realism: An introduction to Roy Bhaskar’philosophy" Verso 1994
• 48 오동주 ; 황홍섭, "COVID-19가 교육에 미친 인식, 행동, 가치 및 태도의 변화 양상" 한국사회과교육연구학회 59 (59): 223-250, 2020
• 49 Young, M., "Bringing knowledge back in:From social constructivism to social realism in the sociology of education" Routledge 2008
• 50 Strauss, A., "Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques" Sage 1998
• 51 Hofstadter, R., "Anti-intellectualism in American life" Vintage Books 1973
• 52 Strong, T., "A review of Lorraine Daston and Peter Galison’s objectivity" 13 (13): 62-66, 2008
• 53 Lambert, D., "A response to Graves and Slater" 25 : 192-193, 2016