英語리듬의 音韻論的 特質 : 口頭傳達能力의 向上을 위한 한 考察 = A Study of the Comparison between Harris's and Chomsky's Grammer

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

This study is to compare between grammars of Haris and Chomsky which have different conceptual bases. And the study can be concluded as follows.
In the first place, though Harris and Chomsky have similar views in that they formulate questions about language structure in terms of descriptive tools, e. g. transformations, which are algebraically formalizable, both of them differ in defining linguistic explanation. The differences can be summarized as follows.
ⅰ) Harris' transformations are not used to generate sentences, but they are used to factor generalizations about the distributional similarities of strings, co-occurrence and paraphrase from a given finite corpus of surface structure strings. But Chomsky's transformations play a role in generating an infinite number of sentences from abstract underlying structures.
ⅱ) Harris' transformations relate one surface structure string with another surface structure string. They are not ordered nor are there any abstract underlying forms. Ideally all transformations should be biconditional. On the other hand, Chomsky's transformations derive surface structures from abstract underlying structures which in no direct way correspond to surface structure strings. And Chomsky's transformational rules are ordered and require the existence of abstract underlying forms.
ⅲ) In Harris' system, the fact that certain relations of co-occurrence and paraphrase obtain between two surface structure strings is a necessary and sufficient condition to postulate a transformational relation between them. But in Chomsky's grammar, a transformation relates an abstract structure with another abstract structure instead of relating co-occurrence and paraphrase between two surface structures.
ⅳ) In Harris' system, two sentences before and after a transformation are related as synonymous. If it is correct, generative semantics corresponds to Harris' transformation system. In Chomsky's grammar, however, meaning interpretation can be formed not only in deep structure but also either in the process of a transformation or in the surface structue after a transformation. Consequently, the question 'Does a transformation change meaning?' makes sense in Harris' transformations, where as it makes no sense in Chomsky's transformational generative grammar.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• Ⅰ. 序 言
• Ⅱ. 英語 리듬의 音韻論的 特質
• 1. 强 勢
• 1) 强勢의 定義
• 2) 强勢의 段階
• 3) 文强勢
• 2. 英語 리듬과 文强勢
• 3. 縮的音節
• 1) 縮的되는 單語
• 2) 蒻形의 同音化
• Ⅲ. 傳達能力과 理論의 適用
• 1. 强 勢
• 1) 語群의 强勢
• 2) 文强勢와 리듬
• 3) 意思段落과 音調를 包含한 리듬의 聽取와 口頭練習
• Ⅳ. 結 言
• 參考文獻
• Summary