팔레스타인의 세계화와 경제발전 = Economic Globalization & Development in Palestine

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

Since occupied by Israel in 1967, Palestinian area has compulsorily been integrated in unilateral political, military, and economic interests of Israel. Israel adopted the policies allowing to move freely labors and goods between Palestine and Israel to mitigate continuous conflicts for early times under occupation, a fact that seemed to expand the Palestinian economy but in fact deepened the distortion of its economic structure. Such a distortion of the economic structure in this region cropped up the excessive dependency of palestinian trade and labor force for Israel, the low-level of industrialization, and the poor infrastructure.
Palestine National Authority adopted the Neo-liberalism development strategy designed by Israel, Palestine National Authority, IMF, and World Bank after DoP-Declaration of Principle-in Oslo, a strategy that intended to pursue sustaining economic growth of Palestine and improve the distorted economic structure of Palestine that was derived from the occupation by Israel in 1967. This Development Strategy by signing DoP gave shape to the Aid programs of international society, Economic Protocol signed between Israel and PLO, and the establishment of the legal and systemic conditions fostering to develop private sectors of Palestine.
It was expected that the future of Palestinian economy that adopted this strategy would be optimistic. Especially, World Bank predicted that Palestinian economy would show its potentiality of economic growth with the low cost, high-educated labor supplies, easy access into the international market, investment from palestinian immigrants, and aids of international society.
In contrast to the rosy prospects in those time, this strategy resulted in disappointed things such as a reduction of productivity, a decrease in national income per capita, an increase in unemployment rate and the poor, a stagnation of the amount of export of Palestine, and inactivity of domestic and foreign investments. These results came from the greatest reason that Israel blocked up or restricted the movement of labors and commodities for the security of Israel. Besides, they were attributed to a weak systemic condition in the autonomous region of Palestine. Connecting with the second Intifada, Sep. 2000, such disappointed results have a bad influence to establish peace in this area.
To establish the permanent peace of the Arab world, it is thought that the development of Palestinian economy is very important. Therefore, in the short term, labors and goods among Israel, Palestine, Gaza, West Bank, and other countries must be freely moved to recover the decrease of productivity and income deriving from the disturbance in this region through an appeasement policy by which Israel has blocked up.
In the long term, Palestine needs to expand the open-door principle of trade by reinforcing the friendly relationship with Israel and to build its economic fundamental by strengthening the cooperation with aid countries. Domestically, Palestine National Authority has to set insufficient systemic devices in good condition so that the private sector lead to the growth of Palestinian economy, thus building up the foundation of its continuous economic development. If the bankrupted economy of Palestine meets the conditions above, Palestine will achieve recovery of economy, a recovery that will contribute to restoring the eternal peace in Middle East region.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• Ⅰ. 서론
• Ⅱ. 경제환경과 산업구조
• Ⅲ. 오슬로 협정 이후의 신자유주의 발전전략의 채택
• (1) 점령기(1967-1994)의 경제구조의 왜곡
• (2) 오슬로 협정 이후의 신자유주의 발전전략의 채택
• 1) 국제원조프로그램
• 2) 경제관계에 관한 의정서(Economic Protocol)
• 3) 법적/제도적 환경조성
• Ⅳ. 신자유주의 발전전략의 경제적 성과
• Ⅴ. 결론