KCI등재후보
Building the Judging and Scoring Standard for Olympic Games; Study on Yang Tae Young case
저자
발행기관
학술지명
권호사항
발행연도
2008
작성언어
English
주제어
등재정보
KCI등재후보
자료형태
학술저널
수록면
101-114(14쪽)
KCI 피인용횟수
1
DOI식별코드
제공처
The scandals and disputes of the recent Olympic Games is attributable to the IOC's unwillingness to intervene. The Bottom line is that international federations for each sport lack adequate judging and scoring standards that would preempt the eruption of dispute between athletes and nations. There comes the need for the IOC to aggressively reform judging and scoring standards for the Olympic Games. The IOC needs to develop standard guidelines for judging procedures and qualifications for judges to be enforced on the international federations for each sport.
In Yang Tae Young case in 2004 Athens Games, the controversy surrounding the Gold Medal for the Men's All-Around Gymnastic competition created a heated dispute between the USOC, various US Senators, and the Korean NOC. Members of the U.S. House Judiciary Committee have legislative and oversight responsibility over the USOC. TUSOC and the Korean Olympic Committee met several times to discuss the dispute before its eventual resolution in the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS). This dispute took on a clearly political character. Both the USOC and the Korean Olympic Committee argued their claims in front of the CAS with an army of attorneys and at great expense, and it created a hazardous environment where nations became engaged in political disputes with each other over Olympic events. It is believed that there is an extremely dangerous potential in the Games if these types of judging and scoring disputes are not resolved.
For that regard, the IOC also must rein in and eliminate the corruption of the international federations in order to resurrect the original spirit of fairness and competition. The IOC should establish its own judicial body over all Olympic-related disputes to review disputes that arise throughout the course of the Games. The IOC should use its own overarching judging and scoring standards and also the approved international federation rules to judge disputes. The immediately enforceable and final decisions of IOC would provide for a more immediate method of dispute resolution, which would eliminate the lag time experienced by appeals to the CAS. This might help alleviate the tensions between countries that are defending their athletes by eliminating the waiting period when political posturing has time to heat up the argument.
These suggestions should be implemented immediately. The IOC can use its authority of patronage over the international federations to pass the judging and scoring standards. Within the Olympic Charter, international federations are bound to work to aid in the Olympic Movement. In this spirit, the international federations should work to make the IOC's transition into an active role as smooth as possible. It is in the best interest of the IOC, international federations, national Olympic committees, nations, athletes, and the audience for the judging and scoring of the Games to be reformed.
The scandals and disputes of the recent Olympic Games is attributable to the IOC's unwillingness to intervene. The Bottom line is that international federations for each sport lack adequate judging and scoring standards that would preempt the eruption of dispute between athletes and nations. There comes the need for the IOC to aggressively reform judging and scoring standards for the Olympic Games. The IOC needs to develop standard guidelines for judging procedures and qualifications for judges to be enforced on the international federations for each sport.
In Yang Tae Young case in 2004 Athens Games, the controversy surrounding the Gold Medal for the Men's All-Around Gymnastic competition created a heated dispute between the USOC, various US Senators, and the Korean NOC. Members of the U.S. House Judiciary Committee have legislative and oversight responsibility over the USOC. TUSOC and the Korean Olympic Committee met several times to discuss the dispute before its eventual resolution in the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS). This dispute took on a clearly political character. Both the USOC and the Korean Olympic Committee argued their claims in front of the CAS with an army of attorneys and at great expense, and it created a hazardous environment where nations became engaged in political disputes with each other over Olympic events. It is believed that there is an extremely dangerous potential in the Games if these types of judging and scoring disputes are not resolved.
For that regard, the IOC also must rein in and eliminate the corruption of the international federations in order to resurrect the original spirit of fairness and competition. The IOC should establish its own judicial body over all Olympic-related disputes to review disputes that arise throughout the course of the Games. The IOC should use its own overarching judging and scoring standards and also the approved international federation rules to judge disputes. The immediately enforceable and final decisions of IOC would provide for a more immediate method of dispute resolution, which would eliminate the lag time experienced by appeals to the CAS. This might help alleviate the tensions between countries that are defending their athletes by eliminating the waiting period when political posturing has time to heat up the argument.
These suggestions should be implemented immediately. The IOC can use its authority of patronage over the international federations to pass the judging and scoring standards. Within the Olympic Charter, international federations are bound to work to aid in the Olympic Movement. In this spirit, the international federations should work to make the IOC's transition into an active role as smooth as possible. It is in the best interest of the IOC, international federations, national Olympic committees, nations, athletes, and the audience for the judging and scoring of the Games to be reformed.
분석정보
연월일 | 이력구분 | 이력상세 | 등재구분 |
---|---|---|---|
2027 | 평가예정 | 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증) | |
2021-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) | KCI등재 |
2018-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 선정 (계속평가) | KCI등재 |
2017-12-01 | 평가 | 등재후보로 하락 (계속평가) | KCI후보 |
2015-06-12 | 학술지명변경 | 한글명 : 스포츠와 법 -> 스포츠엔터테인먼트와 법 | KCI등재 |
2013-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) | KCI등재 |
2010-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) | KCI등재 |
2009-01-01 | 평가 | 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) | KCI후보 |
2008-01-01 | 평가 | 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) | KCI후보 |
2007-09-03 | 학회명변경 | 한글명 : 한국스포츠법학회 -> 한국스포츠엔터테인먼트법학회영문명 : The Korean Association Of Sports Law -> The Korean Association of Sports & Entertainment Law | KCI후보 |
2007-09-03 | 학술지명변경 | 외국어명 : The Journal of Sports and Law -> The Journal of Sports and Entertainment Law | KCI후보 |
2006-01-01 | 평가 | 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) | KCI후보 |
기준연도 | WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) | KCIF(2년) | KCIF(3년) |
---|---|---|---|
2016 | 0.74 | 0.74 | 0.7 |
KCIF(4년) | KCIF(5년) | 중심성지수(3년) | 즉시성지수 |
0.73 | 0.78 | 0.741 | 0.27 |
서지정보 내보내기(Export)
닫기소장기관 정보
닫기권호소장정보
닫기오류접수
닫기오류 접수 확인
닫기음성서비스 신청
닫기음성서비스 신청 확인
닫기이용약관
닫기학술연구정보서비스 이용약관 (2017년 1월 1일 ~ 현재 적용)
학술연구정보서비스(이하 RISS)는 정보주체의 자유와 권리 보호를 위해 「개인정보 보호법」 및 관계 법령이 정한 바를 준수하여, 적법하게 개인정보를 처리하고 안전하게 관리하고 있습니다. 이에 「개인정보 보호법」 제30조에 따라 정보주체에게 개인정보 처리에 관한 절차 및 기준을 안내하고, 이와 관련한 고충을 신속하고 원활하게 처리할 수 있도록 하기 위하여 다음과 같이 개인정보 처리방침을 수립·공개합니다.
주요 개인정보 처리 표시(라벨링)
목 차
3년
또는 회원탈퇴시까지5년
(「전자상거래 등에서의 소비자보호에 관한3년
(「전자상거래 등에서의 소비자보호에 관한2년
이상(개인정보보호위원회 : 개인정보의 안전성 확보조치 기준)개인정보파일의 명칭 | 운영근거 / 처리목적 | 개인정보파일에 기록되는 개인정보의 항목 | 보유기간 | |
---|---|---|---|---|
학술연구정보서비스 이용자 가입정보 파일 | 한국교육학술정보원법 | 필수 | ID, 비밀번호, 성명, 생년월일, 신분(직업구분), 이메일, 소속분야, 웹진메일 수신동의 여부 | 3년 또는 탈퇴시 |
선택 | 소속기관명, 소속도서관명, 학과/부서명, 학번/직원번호, 휴대전화, 주소 |
구분 | 담당자 | 연락처 |
---|---|---|
KERIS 개인정보 보호책임자 | 정보보호본부 김태우 | - 이메일 : lsy@keris.or.kr - 전화번호 : 053-714-0439 - 팩스번호 : 053-714-0195 |
KERIS 개인정보 보호담당자 | 개인정보보호부 이상엽 | |
RISS 개인정보 보호책임자 | 대학학술본부 장금연 | - 이메일 : giltizen@keris.or.kr - 전화번호 : 053-714-0149 - 팩스번호 : 053-714-0194 |
RISS 개인정보 보호담당자 | 학술진흥부 길원진 |
자동로그아웃 안내
닫기인증오류 안내
닫기귀하께서는 휴면계정 전환 후 1년동안 회원정보 수집 및 이용에 대한
재동의를 하지 않으신 관계로 개인정보가 삭제되었습니다.
(참조 : RISS 이용약관 및 개인정보처리방침)
신규회원으로 가입하여 이용 부탁 드리며, 추가 문의는 고객센터로 연락 바랍니다.
- 기존 아이디 재사용 불가
휴면계정 안내
RISS는 [표준개인정보 보호지침]에 따라 2년을 주기로 개인정보 수집·이용에 관하여 (재)동의를 받고 있으며, (재)동의를 하지 않을 경우, 휴면계정으로 전환됩니다.
(※ 휴면계정은 원문이용 및 복사/대출 서비스를 이용할 수 없습니다.)
휴면계정으로 전환된 후 1년간 회원정보 수집·이용에 대한 재동의를 하지 않을 경우, RISS에서 자동탈퇴 및 개인정보가 삭제처리 됩니다.
고객센터 1599-3122
ARS번호+1번(회원가입 및 정보수정)