헌법상 교육과정 결정의 참여ㆍ협의(약)권-교사와 교사 집단을 중심으로-

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

According to article 31.6 of the Constitution that details of the educational system shall be provided for by laws and regulations, the standard and the contents of curriculums are dependent upon the subordinate laws and regulations. Among them, it is required by law that school subjects shall be selected by a Presidential decree
and the others by a notice issued by the Ministry of Educational & Human Resources Development Judging from the present system,
therefore, all the rights related to the decision of curriculums seem to belong to the Government.
Despite some limitations, the teachers' right of teaching can be considered as a Constitutional right of liberty. The liberty, in
essence, means the rejection of the nation's Interference, but it may Include the demand for the nation's active participation in order to ensure its full realization. This shows that the liberty has some aspects as a social right. From this point of view, we know that teachers not only have the right to reject the nation's wrong interference in order to teach students well but also can demand the establishment of organizations for consulting about the inner parts of education such as educational aims, contents, teaching-learning
methods, and evaluation methods, in the nation's deciding the curriculums. And these can be derived from the liberty's aspects as
a social right.
On the other hand, among the 3 basic rights to labor, the two are
guaranteed by the Law On the Foundation and Operation of Teacher's Labor Union Therefore, whether the union can negotiate
the curriculums and make a collective agreement with nation can emerge as a problem. Because the aim of a collective bargaining is
Just to maintain and improve working conditions, it is reasonable that curriculums unrelated with working conditions are excluded
from the scope of collective bargaining.
Among the curriculum, the subjects in school and the standards
of orgamzation and time allotment, which are the fundamental parts of education policies, cannot be targets of collective bargaining. This
can be justified by the article 12 provisos of the Special Law for the Improvement of Teachers' Status requiring that matters related
to the control and operation of educational administrations and the curriculums
shall not be negotiable But in case where a newly-announced curriculum makes changes to the organization, time allotment, and school subjects and thereby leaves extra teachers out of office or makes working conditions worse such as
an increase in teaching time, the teacher's union has the right to request the nation to have obligatory negotiations

참고문헌 (Reference)

• 1 홍성방, "현대사회에서의 기본권 이론" 30 (30): 2001
• 2 송요원, "미국 교사의 학문의 자유에 대한 분석" 대한교육법학회 (13) : 2001
• 3 김유성, "노동법Ⅱ," 법문사 2002
• 4 교육학 사전 편찬위원회, "교육학대사전" 대한교육연합회 1967
• 5 송요원, "교육을 받을 권리의 무상성" 한국토지공법학회 19 : 29-784, 2003
• 6 허경철, "교육과정교과서 관리 및 운영 체제 국제비교 연구 연구보고 CRC 2002-14" 한국교육과정평가원 2002
• 7 노기호, "교원의 교육권에 관한 연구" 1998
• 8 송요원, "교실에서의 언론(학문)의 자유" 한국헌법학회 9 (9): 2003
• 9 허종렬, "공법상 특별권력관계이론과 헌법 제31조 제4항" 大韓敎育法學會 (7) : 1995
• 10 "現代資本主義と基本的 人權 基本的 人權Ⅰ" 東大出版會 1968
• 11 "基本的 人權 硏究" 1991
• 12 "人權體系における自由權社會權の區分論の意義と限界" 1986
• 13 이상윤, "“교원노조의 노동법 및 교육법상의 법적 지위”" 2003
• 14 2nd ed, "The school in the Legal Structure" 1973
• 15 Goldstein, "The Asserted Constitutional Right of Public School Teachers to Determine What They Teach" 1976
• 16 Gregory A, "Public School Teachers and the First Amendment; Protecting the Right to Teach" 65-, 1990
• 17 Martha M. McCarthy, "Public School Law" Allyn & Bacon 1998
• 18 "Constitutional law - First amendment - Fourth Circuit rules that a teacher's selection of school curriculum is not protected speech - Boring v. Buncombe county Board of Education," 136 (136): 364-, 1999