우리나라 중소제조기업의 영업비밀 사용 요인에 관한 연구: 인력을 중심으로 = A Study on the Factors Affecting South Korean Small and Medium-sized Manufacturing Enterprises’ Use of Trade Secrecy: A Manpower Perspective

국문 초록 (Abstract)

영업비밀과 특허는 가장 보편적으로 사용되는 기술 보호 방식이지만, 영업비밀은 그 정의 상 관측이 어려워 영업비밀 연구는 특허 연구에 비해 매우 부족한 편이다. 본 연구는 우리나라 중소제조기업의 영업비밀 사용을 R&D 인력과 판매 인력을 중심으로 연구한다. 연구결과는 기업의 비밀유지협약(non-disclosure agreement) 체결 여부가 R&D 인력과는 정(+)의 관계를, 판매 인력과는 부(-)의 관계를 가짐을 보여준다. 본 연구는 기술의 가치사슬(value chain) 상･하류에 위치한 인력이 지식재산 보호 방식의 결정에 정반대의 영향을 줄 수 있음을 조명하였다. 이는 선행연구의 상･하류 역량 구분이 중소제조기업의 지식재산 보호 방식의 결정과 관련해서도 유효하다는 것을 시사한다. 본 연구는 인력이 각 보호 방식의 종합적 사용에 잠재적 변동을 초래할 수 있음을 보여주었다는 점에서 인적자본(human capital) 문헌과 가치 전유 메커니즘(value capture mechanism) 문헌의 교차점에 기여하는 바가 크다.

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

Trade secrecy and patents are the two most widely used intellectual property (IP) protection mechanisms. Despite the plethora of research on patents, relatively few studies have examined firms’ decisions on trade secrecy, largely because these are not suited for empirical observation. This study examines the factors affecting South Korean small and medium-sized manufacturing enterprises’ use of trade secrecy, focusing on R&D (upstream) and marketing (downstream) manpower. The findings suggest that the choice to use a non-disclosure agreement was positively related to R&D manpower, but negatively to marketing manpower. This study highlights that upstream and downstream manpower can have opposite influences on IP protection mechanism choices. This finding suggests that prior work’s demarcation of upstream and downstream capabilities provides a useful insight on the choices of IP protection mechanisms. This study shows that a firm’s manpower can potentially alter the bundled use of IP protection mechanisms, contributing to the intersection of human capital and value capture mechanism literature.

참고문헌 (Reference)

• 1 정찬식 ; 고유흠 ; 김혜정 ; 강경남, "지식재산 경영인력이 기업 특허성과에 미치는 영향" 17 (17): 199-215, 2022
• 2 곽기호 ; 김경민, "중소기업의 기술사업화 성과 : 기술 역량과 실증 역량 간 상호작용을 중심으로" 18 (18): 225-256, 2023
• 3 중소벤처기업부, "중소기업실태조사" 2019
• 4 홍장표 ; 남종석, "대･중소기업간 거래관계가 협력 중소기업의 연구개발 투자에 미치는 영향" 38 (38): 87-107, 2016
• 5 주시형, "기술혁신 보호전략에 대한 연구-한국기업의 제품혁신을 중심으로-" 7 (7): 3-28, 2012
• 6 Hayter, C. S., "Why do knowledge-intensive entrepreneurial firms publish their innovative ideas?" 32 : 141-155, 2018
• 7 Gerhart, B., "The resource-based view of the firm, human resources, and human capital : Progress and prospects" 47 (47): 1796-1819, 2021
• 8 Granstrand, O., "The economics and management of intellectual property: Towards intellectual capitalism" Edward Elgar 1999
• 9 Schwartz, A. A., "The corporate preference for trade secret" 74 (74): 623-668, 2013
• 10 Mazzoleni, R., "The benefits and costs of strong patent protection : A contribution to the current debate" 27 (27): 273-284, 1998
• 11 Williamson, O. E., "The Economic Institutions of Capitalism" The Free Press 1985
• 12 Williamson, O. E., "Strategizing, economizing, and economic organization" 12 : 75-94, 1991
• 13 Png, I. P. L., "Secrecy and patents : Theory and evidence from the Uniform Trade Secrets Act" 2 (2): 176-193, 2017
• 14 Cozzolino A., "Responding to complementary-asset discontinuities : A multilevel adaptation framework of resources, demand, and ecosystems" 33 (33): 1990-2017, 2022
• 15 Faems, D., "R&D manpower and technological performance : The impact of demographic and task-related diversity" 42 (42): 1624-1633, 2013
• 16 Cohen, W. M., "Protecting their intellectual assets: Appropriability conditions and why US manufacturing firms patent (or not)" National Bureau of Economic Research 2000
• 17 Lemley, M. A., "Property, intellectual property, and free riding" 83 (83): 1031-1076, 2005
• 18 Teece, D. J., "Profiting from technological innovation : Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy" 15 (15): 285-305, 1986
• 19 Ceccagnoli, M., "Productivity and the role of complementary assets in firms’ demand for technology innovations" 19 (19): 839-869, 2010
• 20 Galasso, A., "Patents and cumulative innovation : Causal evidence from the courts" 130 (130): 317-369, 2015
• 21 Sichelman, T., "Patenting by entrepreneurs : An empirical study" 17 (17): 111-180, 2010
• 22 Spithoven, A., "Open innovation practices in SMEs and large enterprises" 41 : 537-562, 2013
• 23 Chesbrough, H., "Open Business Models: How to Thrive in the New Innovation Landscape" Harvard Business School Publishing 2006
• 24 Fosfuri A., "Masters of war : Rivals' product innovation and new advertising in mature product markets" 55 (55): 181-191, 2009
• 25 Anton, J. J., "Little patents and big secrets : Managing intellectual property" 35 (35): 1-22, 2004
• 26 Dushnitsky, G., "Limitations to interorganizational knowledge acquisition : The paradox of corporate venture capital" 30 (30): 1045-1064, 2009
• 27 Colombo, M. G., "Knowledge misappropriation risks and contractual complexity in entrepreneurial ventures’ non-equity alliances" 53 : 107-127, 2019
• 28 Colombo, M. G., "In search of complementary assets : The determinants of alliance formation of high-tech start-ups" 35 (35): 1166-1199, 2006
• 29 James, S. D., "How firms capture value from their innovations" 39 (39): 1123-1155, 2013
• 30 Spithoven, A., "Heterogeneous firm-level effects of knowledge exchanges on product innovation : Differences between dynamic and lagging product innovators" 27 : 362-381, 2010
• 31 Lieberman, M. B., "Handbook of Business Strategy" Gorham and Lamont 1991
• 32 Lieberman, M. B., "First-mover advantages" 9 : 41-58, 1988
• 33 Hawk, A., "Fast-mover advantages : Speed capabilities and entry into the emerging submarket of atlantic basin LNG" 34 : 1531-1550, 2013
• 34 Lemley, M. A., "Exit strategy" 101 (101): 1-102, 2021
• 35 Greene, W. H., "Econometric analysis" Pearson Education 2012
• 36 Ehrlich, C. P., "Do secrets stop progress? optimizing the law of non-disclosure agreements to promote innovation" 16 (16): 279-316, 2020
• 37 Cozzolino, A., "Discontinuities, competition, and cooperation : Coopetitive dynamics between incumbents and entrants" 39 : 3053-3085, 2018
• 38 Fanimokun, A. O., "Developing high-tech ventures : Entrepreneurs, advisors, and the use of non-disclosure agreements(NDAs)" 25 (25): 103-119, 2012
• 39 Henkel, J., "Defensive Publishing - An Empirical Study"
• 40 Schumpeter J. A., "Creative destruction. Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy" Harper and Row 1942
• 41 Stanko, M. A., "Controversy in innovation outsourcing research : review, synthesis and future directions" 41 : 8-20, 2011
• 42 Teece, D. J., "Competition, cooperation, and innovation : Organizational arrangements for regimes of rapid technological progress" 18 (18): 1-25, 1992
• 43 Somaya, D., "Combining patent law expertise with R&D for patenting performance" 6 (6): 922-937, 2007
• 44 Lampert, C. M., "Branching and anchoring : Complementary asset configurations in conditions of Knightian uncertainty" 45 : 847-868, 2020
• 45 Diestre, L., "Are all ‘sharks’ dangerous? New biotechnology ventures and partner selection in R&D alliances" 33 (33): 1115-1134, 2012