1950년대 전시납북자 귀환 교섭과 한국정부의 대응

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

With the result of the Korean War, many people were lost their lives and their living foundation were demolished. Moreover, a lot of families were separated by the Korean war. During the war period, many people, who lived in the South Korea, were abducted to the North Korea and mobilized for war.
After recapture of Seoul in september 1950, the Korean government and the UN forces had come to perceive the importance of the abduction by North Korea. Since then, the Korean government went to investigate damage of abductee as doing examination war damage with military and civic groups. The Korean government went pushed release of volunteer army prisoners by the North Korea and repatriation of abductees, who interned in the North Korea. Moreover, the Korean government requested cooperation about this issue to the U.S. Eighth Army. On this issue, the U.S. Eighth Army deferred answer because they claimed that this issue is "International problem", which is needed to authorize UN headquarters. In the end, the discussions of a release of volunteer army prisoners and repatriation of abductees could be officially started after start of an armistice talks in a July 1951.
In the armistice talks, a repatriation of abductees negotiation of between the UN forces and the Red army smashed into principle and realistic aspect. The U.N. Forces claimed principle of 1 on 1 exchange by free will. However, the North Korean government argued compulsory repatriation of all prisoner. Meanwhile The difference in the number of prisoners of war became obstacle in the negotiations. In consequence, negotiation of abductees’s repatriation fell into a baffled.
During the process of armistice talks, negotiation of abductees"s return ended in failure. Instead, foundation of returning abductees was laid by ‘Armistice Agreement No.59 displaced civilians provision’. However, in the middle of February, North Korean government broken mutual agreement again, with arguing that “There is no person, who apply to return back to South”. After all, there are no one abductees, who returned their home officially, during the war and after war.
Korean society was enveloped in shock and rage, because of repeated broken mutual agreement by the North Korean government. It come to real and it come to mecharism that worsen relationship between South Korea and North Korea. The issue of abduction by North Korea is sealed a long time, but this issue lifted from the 2,000 in the Korean society, And this issue works as an another barometer that can look back the Korean war in Korean society.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• 1. 머리말
• 2. 서울수복 후 납북문제 인식과 정부의 초기 대응
• 3. 휴전협상시 전쟁포로 교환 논의와 납북자 귀환 교섭
• 4. 1952년초 납북자 귀환 교섭의 결렬과 ‘의용군’ 출신 억류자 석방
• 5. 휴전협정 후 ‘실향사민’ 상호귀환 협상과 북한의 파기
• 6. 맺음말
• 〈ABSTRAC〉

참고문헌 (Reference)

• 1 김미영, "휴전협정 체제에서의 납북 민간인 송환 실패의 원인과 과정, in 납북자문제의 기원·확산·해결" 2010
• 2 김보영, "휴전협정 제59조 ‘실향사민(失鄕私民, displaced civilians)’ 조항을 통해 본 전시 민간인 납치문제의 쟁점과 귀결" 한국역사연구회 (87) : 577-607, 2013
• 3 조성훈, "휴전협상시 남한출신 의용군 문제 누락 배경과 그 영향" 2010
• 4 허만호, "휴전체제의 전환과 전시(戰時)민간인 납북자" 한국전쟁납북사건자료원 2010
• 5 휴전대책연구회, "한국전쟁사료 99" 1991
• 6 "한국전쟁납북사건자료집 1권" 793-803,
• 7 외무부 특수지역과, "한국전쟁납북사건자료집 1권" 830-841,
• 8 "한국전쟁납북사건자료집 1권"
• 9 "한국전쟁납북사건사료집 1·2권" 2006
• 10 조성훈, "한국전쟁 중 민간인억류자의 처리에 관한 연구" 32 : 1996
• 11 조성훈, "한국전쟁 중 공산측의 유엔군 포로정책에 대한 연구" 6 : 1997
• 12 "조선일보"
• 13 김보영, "연구동향 : 한국전쟁 휴전협정과 전쟁의 유산" 한국역사연구회 (80) : 345-359, 2011
• 14 공보처 통계국, "서울특별시 피해자명부"
• 15 "서울신문"
• 16 서주석, "미국의 대북한 포로 및 유해 송환 정책" 35 : 1997
• 17 "동아일보"
• 18 "납치인사 귀환촉진에 관한 건"
• 19 "납치 민간인사 송환촉진에 관한 건의안"
• 20 윤여상, "납북자 실태와 해결방안" 평화문제연구소 37 (37): 283-313, 2002
• 21 제성호, "국군포로 및 납북자문제 해결방안" 7 (7): 2001
• 22 서주석, "국군포로 및 납북자 송환문제 연구" 통일정책연구소 21 : 1998
• 23 "경향신문"
• 24 조성훈, "6·25전쟁 휴전협상 중 남한출신 의용군 문제 누락 배경과 해결 방안" 평화문제연구소 23 (23): 107-142, 2011
• 25 허만호, "6·25전쟁 민간인 납북:통계로 본 북한정부의 의도성" 18 : 2013
• 26 김명호, "6·25전쟁 납북자 실태분석과 정책적 대응방안 모색" 4 (4): 2004
• 27 윤여상, "6.25 전쟁 납북자 문제의 성격과 해결 방안" 한국정치학회 38 (38): 217-236, 2004