법률복지와 법률구조 서비스의 발전과제 ; 법률복지개념의 헌법적 정당화와 발전방안: 법률구조의 패러다임 전환을 위한 시론 = A Constitutional Justification for A New Paradigm of Legal Welfare: Beyond a Supplementary Concept of Legal Aid

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

This essay aims to search for a new paradigm for comprehensive legal welfare overcoming the traditional selective understanding of legal aid which has so far been understood as a supplementary scheme for the rule of law by way of guaranteeing the poor the right to access to justice. Its main argument is that the traditional concept of legal aid constructed mainly upon a liberal ideal of rule of law reveals its inherent problem by focusing mainly upon a retrospective support of the poor in the litigation process; it fails to address the necessity for legal welfare to enhance civic autonomy of a democratic republic. In a democratic republic based upon voluntary participation of the citizens, not only retrospective legal aid but also sufficient preventive legal service together with legal education helping the citizen have an effective access to justice and the social welfare system are necessary to enhance civic autonomy of the citizen. As the Korean Constitution clearly endorses, the human dignity and worth cannot be accomplished without social justice and public welfare. Sufficient and sustainable social welfare in turn requires a scheme of universal legal welfare covering not only litigation aid but also a variety of aids for alternative dispute resolution, public interest law activities and legal education service. In sum, social welfare and a democratic republic cannot be conceived without legal welfare. One of key national tasks of Korean society in the coming future is how to strategically manage to implement this new concept of legal welfare to reinforce a democratic welfare republic. A desirable option proposed in this essay is a phased approach: the first stage concentrates upon perception change among key actors having a role in legal welfare system; the second stage focuses upon the institutionalization of the new paradigm such as reforms of legal welfare delivery system, legal welfare funding and legal service market; and the final stage quests for the proliferation of service beneficiary and the nationalization of legal welfare center.

참고문헌 (Reference)

• 1 김종철, "현행 법학전문대학원 도입법안의 문제점과 대안" (138) : 45-50, 2005
• 2 "헌재 1994. 2. 24 선고 93헌마192 결정"
• 3 한수웅, "헌법학" 법문사 2011
• 4 "헌법 제34조 제2항 내지 제4항"
• 5 허영, "한국헌법론" 162-163, 2011
• 6 전광석, "한국사회보장법론" 법문사 2010
• 7 이국운, "정원제 사법시험제도의 위헌성" (18) : 299-338, 2000
• 8 권오승, "삶의 질 향상과 법률서비스" (18) : 9-11,
• 9 남찬섭, "사회복지정책론" 나눔의집 2007
• 10 김종철, "법학교육과 법률가양성제도 개혁의 방향：개혁의 하드웨어적 측면" 법과사회이론학회 24 : 55-82, 2003
• 11 정종섭, "법률복지서비스의 미래 전망 및 정책 방향 고찰" 2012
• 12 성낙인, "법률복지국가 실현을 위한 정부와 법률구조공단의 역할과 과제" 한국공법학회 38 (38): 75-100, 2010
• 13 민경식, "법률구조제도의 세계적 흐름과 동향-법률구조서비스의 개선을 위한 정책방향모색의 관점에서-" 중앙대학교 법학연구소 22 : 1997
• 14 김대환, "법률구조제도에 관한 연구" 전남대학교 대학원 2008
• 15 전광석, "법률구조제도 개선을 위한 연구" 대법원(법원행정처) 4-5, 2012
• 16 민경식, "법률구조의 이론적 전망과 실제" 중앙대학교 법학연구소 23 (23): 1999
• 17 최광선, "법률구조와 ADR의 관계 : 대한법률구조공단의 소송전구조를 중심으로" 고려대학교 대학원 2010
• 18 황승흠, "법률구조 서비스의 전달체계의 재구성" 2012
• 19 "대한법률구조공단 홈페이지 통계자료"
• 20 "대한법률구조공단 홈페이지 통계자료"
• 21 김도훈, "法律救助法上 法律救助에 관한 小考" 법학연구원 22 (22): 93-128, 2012
• 22 전광석, "憲法裁判所가 바라 본 福祉國家原理" 한국공법학회 34 (34): 222-252, 2006
• 23 Hilary Somerlad, "Some Reflections on the Relationship between Citizenship, Access to Justice, and the Reform of Legal Aid" 31 (31): 351-355, 2004
• 24 Christine Parker, "Just Lawyers – Regulation and Access to Justice" Oxford University Press 1999
• 25 헌재, "5. 30 선고 2001헌바28 결정"
• 26 헌재, "5. 28 선고 96헌가4등 결정"
• 27 헌재, "4. 26 선고 2000헌마390 결정"
• 28 헌재, "12.22 선고 88헌가13결정"
• 29 헌재, "12. 22 선고 88헌가13 결정"
• 30 헌재, "12. 18 선고 2002헌마52 결정"
• 31 헌재, "10. 28 선고 2002헌마328 결정"